Matthew Sample

784 citations
23 papers · 460 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Sample

22 papers receiving 449 citations

Peers

Matthew Sample
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Health Informatics 50
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 236
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 124
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 60
  • Neurology 64
Replace Nita A. Farahany with:
Nita A. Farahany United States
Robert G. Alexander United States
Xiaohua Li China
Timothy Brown United States
Veronica Johansson Sweden
Itay Asher Israel
J. G. Quinn Canada
Agneta Rydberg Sweden
Albert E. Kim United States
Scott Barb United States
Matthew Sample relative to Nita A. Farahany United States Nita A. Farahany's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Nita A. Farahany · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Sample

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Sample's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Sample with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Sample more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Sample

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Sample. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Sample. The network helps show where Matthew Sample may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Sample, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Sample Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Sample links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2017136
2 201955
3 201548
4 202331
5 202227
6 201924
7 201724
8 201923
9 201817
10 201915
11 202410
12 201810
13 20247
14 20226
15 20236
16 20175
17 20254
18 20224
19 20153
20 20193

About Matthew Sample

Matthew Sample is a scholar working on Health Informatics, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, History and Philosophy of Science and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 23 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (8 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (7 papers), EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers), RNA Interference and Gene Delivery (3 papers) and Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (50 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (236 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (124 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (60 citations) and Neurology (64 citations). Matthew Sample has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Éric Racine, Eran Klein, Sara Goering, Timothy Brown, Anjali R. Truitt, Sebastian Sattler, Stefanie Blain‐Moraes, Michelle Pham, David Rodríguez‐Arias and Petr Šulc. Their work appears in journals such as Synthese, Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Hastings Center Report, Small Methods and Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026