Matthew S. Stanford
- Clinical Psychology top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Co-authors
- Jim H. PattonErnest S. BarrattCharles W. MathiasSarah L. LakeNathaniel E. AndersonDonald M. DoughertyKevin W. GreveRebecca J. Houston
- Topics
- Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (13 papers)Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPersonality and Individual DifferencesFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Matthew S. Stanford
61 papers receiving 9.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 152
- Clinical Psychology 5.0k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Psychiatry and Mental health 1.9k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.9k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.5k
Countries citing papers authored by Matthew S. Stanford
This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew S. Stanford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew S. Stanford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew S. Stanford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew S. Stanford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew S. Stanford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew S. Stanford. The network helps show where Matthew S. Stanford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew S. Stanford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew S. Stanford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew S. Stanford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew S. Stanford. Matthew S. Stanford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 17 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 22 | |
| 13 | 66 | |
| 14 | 149 | |
| 15 | 49 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 45 | |
| 18 | 45 | |
| 19 | 158 | |
| 20 | 40 |
About Matthew S. Stanford
Matthew S. Stanford is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Health and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 9.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (13 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (11 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (5.0k citations) and General Decision Sciences (331 citations). Matthew S. Stanford has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Jim H. Patton, Ernest S. Barratt, Charles W. Mathias, Sarah L. Lake, Nathaniel E. Anderson, Donald M. Dougherty, Kevin W. Greve, Rebecca J. Houston, Nicole R. Villemarette-Pittman and Andra Teten Tharp. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Personality and Individual Differences and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.