Matthew R. Farrow

761 total citations
17 papers, 589 citations indexed

About

Matthew R. Farrow is a scholar working on Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew R. Farrow has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 589 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Materials Chemistry, 7 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and 4 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Matthew R. Farrow's work include ZnO doping and properties (6 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (5 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers). Matthew R. Farrow is often cited by papers focused on ZnO doping and properties (6 papers), Catalytic Processes in Materials Science (5 papers) and Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (5 papers). Matthew R. Farrow collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Matthew R. Farrow's co-authors include C. Richard A. Catlow, Scott M. Woodley, Alexey A. Sokol, David Mora‐Fonz, Tomas Lazauskas, Andrew J. Logsdail, Paul Sherwood, David O. Scanlon, Thomas W. Keal and Arunabhiram Chutia and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Chemistry of Materials and Chemical Communications.

In The Last Decade

Matthew R. Farrow

17 papers receiving 582 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Matthew R. Farrow United Kingdom 12 421 145 94 81 71 17 589
Matthew S. Wellons United States 12 366 0.9× 74 0.5× 92 1.0× 108 1.3× 68 1.0× 36 511
W. Hunter Woodward United States 13 534 1.3× 90 0.6× 249 2.6× 98 1.2× 134 1.9× 26 689
Annalisa Del Vitto Italy 15 555 1.3× 135 0.9× 235 2.5× 67 0.8× 124 1.7× 25 698
Ju Chen China 14 211 0.5× 83 0.6× 73 0.8× 92 1.1× 31 0.4× 39 649
Arthur Roussey France 8 563 1.3× 121 0.8× 125 1.3× 191 2.4× 40 0.6× 14 847
Gerd Gantefoer Germany 12 294 0.7× 60 0.4× 164 1.7× 131 1.6× 66 0.9× 29 438
Tianshan Zhao China 16 758 1.8× 295 2.0× 98 1.0× 89 1.1× 38 0.5× 24 1.0k
Lynn V. Koplitz United States 9 359 0.9× 150 1.0× 49 0.5× 54 0.7× 40 0.6× 27 478
V. M. Tapilin Russia 10 260 0.6× 155 1.1× 92 1.0× 24 0.3× 83 1.2× 38 420
Jia Fu United States 13 248 0.6× 67 0.5× 63 0.7× 174 2.1× 66 0.9× 23 527

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew R. Farrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew R. Farrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew R. Farrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew R. Farrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew R. Farrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew R. Farrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew R. Farrow. The network helps show where Matthew R. Farrow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew R. Farrow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew R. Farrow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew R. Farrow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew R. Farrow. Matthew R. Farrow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Lü, You, Matthew R. Farrow, Pierre Fayon, et al.. (2018). Open-Source, Python-Based Redevelopment of the ChemShell Multiscale QM/MM Environment. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation. 15(2). 1317–1328. 67 indexed citations
2.
Lazauskas, Tomas, Alexey A. Sokol, John Buckeridge, et al.. (2018). Thermodynamically accessible titanium clusters TiN, N = 2–32. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 20(20). 13962–13973. 18 indexed citations
3.
Buckeridge, John, C. Richard A. Catlow, Matthew R. Farrow, et al.. (2018). Deep vs shallow nature of oxygen vacancies and consequentn-type carrier concentrations in transparent conducting oxides. Physical Review Materials. 2(5). 91 indexed citations
4.
Chutia, Arunabhiram, Emma K. Gibson, Matthew R. Farrow, et al.. (2017). The adsorption of Cu on the CeO2(110) surface. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 19(40). 27191–27203. 21 indexed citations
5.
Farrow, Matthew R., John Buckeridge, Tomas Lazauskas, et al.. (2017). Heterostructures of GaN with SiC and ZnO enhance carrier stability and separation in framework semiconductors. physica status solidi (a). 214(4). 1600440–1600440. 7 indexed citations
6.
Mora‐Fonz, David, Tomas Lazauskas, Matthew R. Farrow, et al.. (2017). Why Are Polar Surfaces of ZnO Stable?. Chemistry of Materials. 29(12). 5306–5320. 132 indexed citations
7.
Chutia, Arunabhiram, Ian P. Silverwood, Matthew R. Farrow, et al.. (2016). Adsorption of formate species on Cu(h,k,l) low index surfaces. Surface Science. 653. 45–54. 31 indexed citations
8.
O’Malley, Alexander J., Stewart F. Parker, Arunabhiram Chutia, et al.. (2015). Room temperature methoxylation in zeolites: insight into a key step of the methanol-to-hydrocarbons process. Chemical Communications. 52(14). 2897–2900. 59 indexed citations
9.
Farrow, Matthew R., C. Richard A. Catlow, Alexey A. Sokol, & Scott M. Woodley. (2015). Double bubble secondary building units used as a structural motif for enhanced electron–hole separation in solids. Materials Science in Semiconductor Processing. 42. 147–149. 4 indexed citations
10.
Sokol, Alexey A., Matthew R. Farrow, John Buckeridge, et al.. (2014). Double bubbles: a new structural motif for enhanced electron–hole separation in solids. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 16(39). 21098–21105. 9 indexed citations
11.
Farrow, Matthew R., et al.. (2014). Structure prediction of nanoclusters; a direct or a pre-screened search on the DFT energy landscape?. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 16(39). 21119–21134. 36 indexed citations
12.
Farrow, Matthew R., John Buckeridge, C. Richard A. Catlow, et al.. (2014). From Stable ZnO and GaN Clusters to Novel Double Bubbles and Frameworks. Inorganics. 2(2). 248–263. 7 indexed citations
13.
Berger, Daniel, Andrew J. Logsdail, Harald Oberhofer, et al.. (2014). Embedded-cluster calculations in a numeric atomic orbital density-functional theory framework. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 141(2). 24105–24105. 39 indexed citations
14.
Farrow, Matthew R., Philip J. Camp, Peter J. Dowding, & Ken Lewtas. (2013). The effects of surface curvature on the adsorption of surfactants at the solid–liquid interface. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 15(28). 11653–11653. 21 indexed citations
15.
Davidson, Alistair J., Carole A. Morrison, Colin R. Pulham, et al.. (2011). Combined Experimental and Computational Hydrostatic Compression Study of Crystalline Ammonium Perchlorate. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C. 115(38). 18782–18788. 27 indexed citations
16.
Farrow, Matthew R., et al.. (2011). Molecular Simulations of Kinetic-Friction Modification in Nanoscale Fluid Layers. Tribology Letters. 42(3). 325–337. 19 indexed citations
17.
Stirner, T., Matthew R. Farrow, & W. E. Hagston. (2000). Semimagnetic semiconductor quantum wells: magnetic polarons and paramagnetic effects. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter. 12(5). 701–708. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026