Matthew R. Angle

774 total citations
8 papers, 460 citations indexed

About

Matthew R. Angle is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew R. Angle has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 460 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 3 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Matthew R. Angle's work include Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers). Matthew R. Angle is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (6 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (4 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (3 papers). Matthew R. Angle collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Germany. Matthew R. Angle's co-authors include Nicholas A. Melosh, Andreas T. Schaefer, Piyush Verma, Alexander M. Xu, Noureddine Tayebi, Xi Xie, Bianxiao Cui, Andreas Hierlemann, Abdulmalik Obaid and Jan Müller and has published in prestigious journals such as Nano Letters, PLoS ONE and Biophysical Journal.

In The Last Decade

Matthew R. Angle

8 papers receiving 458 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Matthew R. Angle United States	7	297	185	146	133	88	8	460
Ximiao Wen United States	9	224 0.8×	251 1.4×	111 0.8×	105 0.8×	105 1.2×	14	524
Günter Wrobel Germany	11	283 1.0×	234 1.3×	160 1.1×	59 0.4×	85 1.0×	15	485
Giovanni Melle Italy	13	339 1.1×	306 1.7×	108 0.7×	46 0.3×	106 1.2×	19	526
Tianyang Ye United States	8	444 1.5×	258 1.4×	243 1.7×	103 0.8×	81 0.9×	14	642
A. Mohr United States	7	420 1.4×	336 1.8×	145 1.0×	97 0.7×	90 1.0×	9	790
Lars Wallman Sweden	19	297 1.0×	482 2.6×	178 1.2×	87 0.7×	122 1.4×	28	866
Kyounghwan Na United States	12	502 1.7×	253 1.4×	222 1.5×	242 1.8×	40 0.5×	18	658
Frank Sommerhage United States	11	267 0.9×	268 1.4×	71 0.5×	35 0.3×	135 1.5×	22	479
Jan Schnitker Germany	11	313 1.1×	288 1.6×	180 1.2×	46 0.3×	99 1.1×	15	603
Rodrigo Gómez Spain	14	167 0.6×	259 1.4×	211 1.4×	36 0.3×	129 1.5×	31	533

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew R. Angle

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew R. Angle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew R. Angle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew R. Angle more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew R. Angle

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew R. Angle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew R. Angle. The network helps show where Matthew R. Angle may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew R. Angle

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew R. Angle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew R. Angle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew R. Angle. Matthew R. Angle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Wellman, Steven M., Lehong Li, James R. Eles, et al.. (2024). Electrode sharpness and insertion speed reduce tissue damage near high-density penetrating arrays. Journal of Neural Engineering. 21(2). 26030–26030. 11 indexed citations

2.

Boergens, Kevin M., et al.. (2021). Laser ablation of the pia mater for insertion of high-density microelectrode arrays in a translational sheep model. Journal of Neural Engineering. 18(4). 45008–45008. 6 indexed citations

3.

Obaid, Abdulmalik, Mina-Elraheb Hanna, Yu‐Wei Wu, et al.. (2020). Massively parallel microwire arrays integrated with CMOS chips for neural recording. Science Advances. 6(12). eaay2789–eaay2789. 133 indexed citations

4.

Köllő, Mihály, Mina-Elraheb Hanna, Abdulmalik Obaid, et al.. (2020). CHIME: CMOS-Hosted in vivo Microelectrodes for Massively Scalable Neuronal Recordings. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 14. 834–834. 22 indexed citations

5.

Angle, Matthew R., Bianxiao Cui, & Nicholas A. Melosh. (2015). Nanotechnology and neurophysiology. Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 32. 132–140. 54 indexed citations

6.

Angle, Matthew R., et al.. (2014). Penetration of Cell Membranes and Synthetic Lipid Bilayers by Nanoprobes. Biophysical Journal. 107(9). 2091–2100. 42 indexed citations

7.

Xie, Xi, Alexander M. Xu, Matthew R. Angle, et al.. (2013). Mechanical Model of Vertical Nanowire Cell Penetration. Nano Letters. 13(12). 6002–6008. 162 indexed citations

8.

Angle, Matthew R. & Andreas T. Schaefer. (2012). Neuronal Recordings with Solid-Conductor Intracellular Nanoelectrodes (SCINEs). PLoS ONE. 7(8). e43194–e43194. 30 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact