Matthew Field

1.1k citations
43 papers · 756 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Field

42 papers receiving 735 citations

Peers

Matthew Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 117
  • Health Informatics 61
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 310
  • Radiation 68
  • Human-Computer Interaction 42
  • Otorhinolaryngology 31
Replace Michael Friebe with:
Michael Friebe Germany
Yongwon Cho South Korea
Shan Yang Switzerland
Ester Bonmati United Kingdom
Wenjun Tan China
G. Elisabeta Marai United States
Matthias Wilms Canada
Christina Gsaxner Austria
Lauren Kim United States
Phillip Chlap Australia
Matthew Field relative to Michael Friebe Germany Michael Friebe's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Michael Friebe · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Field. The network helps show where Matthew Field may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Field Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018121
2 200967
3 202157
4 202155
5 202052
6 201137
7 201536
8 201736
9 197835
10 201527
11 202226
12 200021
13 202117
14 202116
15 202213
16 201713
17 202110
18 20239
19 20118
20 20227

About Matthew Field

Matthew Field is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Artificial Intelligence, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Otorhinolaryngology and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, having authored 43 papers that have together received 756 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging (21 papers), Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment (15 papers), AI in cancer detection (11 papers), Head and Neck Cancer Studies (6 papers), Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques (4 papers), Time Series Analysis and Forecasting (4 papers) and Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (61 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (310 citations), Radiation (68 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (42 citations) and Otorhinolaryngology (31 citations). Matthew Field has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David Stirling, Lois Holloway, Fazel Naghdy, Zengxi Pan, Montserrat Ros, Martin Carolan, Michael Jameson, Andrew Miller, Shalini Vinod and Christian Ritz. Their work appears in journals such as Cancers, Journal of Solid State Chemistry, Radiotherapy and Oncology, Medical Physics and Robotica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact