Matthew Denton‐Giles

21 total papers · 705 total citations
15 papers, 474 citations indexed

About

Matthew Denton‐Giles is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Matthew Denton‐Giles has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 474 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Cell Biology and 2 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Matthew Denton‐Giles's work include Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (14 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (7 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Matthew Denton‐Giles is often cited by papers focused on Plant pathogens and resistance mechanisms (14 papers), Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (7 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). Matthew Denton‐Giles collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and Canada. Matthew Denton‐Giles's co-authors include Mark C. Derbyshire, Lars G. Kamphuis, Sylvain Raffaele, Malick Mbengué, Jeffrey A. Rollins, Olivier Navaud, J.A.L. van Kan, Michael Seidl, Richard P. Oliver and Luigi Faino and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Frontiers in Microbiology.

In The Last Decade

Matthew Denton‐Giles

15 papers receiving 473 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Matthew Denton‐Giles 458 107 88 70 63 15 474
J.F. Kollmorgen 500 1.1× 119 1.1× 63 0.7× 44 0.6× 68 1.1× 21 542
T. G. Atkinson 407 0.9× 79 0.7× 63 0.7× 15 0.2× 47 0.7× 20 445
Richard D. Schein 445 1.0× 140 1.3× 66 0.8× 64 0.9× 51 0.8× 12 509
Romina Polley 400 0.9× 173 1.6× 32 0.4× 47 0.7× 34 0.5× 18 422
Alan T. Dyer 386 0.8× 233 2.2× 34 0.4× 25 0.4× 28 0.4× 24 424
NT Flentje 419 0.9× 180 1.7× 71 0.8× 46 0.7× 18 0.3× 27 473
R. Michael Davis 362 0.8× 159 1.5× 58 0.7× 67 1.0× 33 0.5× 13 412
P. Marciano 506 1.1× 113 1.1× 115 1.3× 42 0.6× 98 1.6× 20 538
W. C. James 469 1.0× 98 0.9× 37 0.4× 33 0.5× 71 1.1× 16 511
William S. Cuddy 385 0.8× 64 0.6× 143 1.6× 62 0.9× 32 0.5× 11 457

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Denton‐Giles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Denton‐Giles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Denton‐Giles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Denton‐Giles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Denton‐Giles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Denton‐Giles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Denton‐Giles. The network helps show where Matthew Denton‐Giles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Matthew Denton‐Giles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Matthew Denton‐Giles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Matthew Denton‐Giles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Matthew Denton‐Giles. Matthew Denton‐Giles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026