Matthew Borgia

1.7k citations
61 papers · 1.2k · h-index 19

Impact in

Papers in

Matthew Borgia

59 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Matthew Borgia
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Rehabilitation 338
  • Biomedical Engineering 711
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 185
  • General Health Professions 235
  • Occupational Therapy 38
Replace Todd E. Davenport with:
Todd E. Davenport United States
Elizabeth Domholdt United States
Nerrolyn Ramstrand Sweden
Lydia Abdul Latif Malaysia
Martha Visintin Canada
Nazirah Hasnan Malaysia
Marghuretta D. Bland United States
Susan Barreca Canada
Dennis R. Louie Canada
Andrew Packel United States
Matthew Borgia relative to Todd E. Davenport United States Todd E. Davenport's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.7×
Todd E. Davenport · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Matthew Borgia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Matthew Borgia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Matthew Borgia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Matthew Borgia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Matthew Borgia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Matthew Borgia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Matthew Borgia. The network helps show where Matthew Borgia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Matthew Borgia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Matthew Borgia Line = papers co-authored together Matthew Borgia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011197
2 201299
3 201980
4 201552
5 201243
6 201542
7 201339
8 201534
9 201133
10 202032
11 201131
12 201428
13 201827
14 201525
15 202024
16 201422
17 201522
18 202022
19 201621
20 201417

About Matthew Borgia

Matthew Borgia is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Rehabilitation, General Health Professions, Pharmacology and Surgery, having authored 61 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Muscle activation and electromyography studies (37 papers), Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics (35 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (30 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Homelessness and Social Issues (7 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (6 papers), Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (5 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (338 citations), Biomedical Engineering (711 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (185 citations), General Health Professions (235 citations) and Occupational Therapy (38 citations). Matthew Borgia has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Nepal and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Linda Resnik, Melissa A. Clark, Erin Johnson, Thomas O’Toole, Jennifer Rose, Lisa Smurr Walters, Laurel M. Adams, Noah J. Sasson, Paul A. Pirraglia and Allen W. Heinemann. Their work appears in journals such as Prosthetics and Orthotics International, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, PM&R, PLoS ONE and JPO Journal of Prosthetics and Orthotics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact