Mathilde Lachia

690 citations
21 papers · 573 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Mathilde Lachia

21 papers receiving 571 citations

Peers

Mathilde Lachia
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
  • Organic Chemistry 291
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 180
  • Plant Science 262
  • Pharmacology 35
  • Inorganic Chemistry 35
Replace Carlton L. Campbell with:
Carlton L. Campbell United States
H. S. Bevinakatti India
Yuanqiong Huang China
Christopher M. Glinkerman United States
Tommaso A. Foderaro United States
Yang Zuo China
William T. Lambert United States
Jonathan D. Sellars United Kingdom
Zili Ren China
Ali Dai China
Mathilde Lachia relative to Carlton L. Campbell United States Carlton L. Campbell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Carlton L. Campbell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mathilde Lachia

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathilde Lachia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathilde Lachia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathilde Lachia more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathilde Lachia

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathilde Lachia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathilde Lachia. The network helps show where Mathilde Lachia may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mathilde Lachia, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mathilde Lachia Line = papers co-authored together Mathilde Lachia links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2008100
2 201252
3 201651
4 201546
5 200541
6 200740
7 201439
8 201629
9 201424
10 201422
11 201420
12 201918
13 201815
14 201914
15 200613
16 201813
17 202113
18 20119
19 20178
20 20234

About Mathilde Lachia

Mathilde Lachia is a scholar working on Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Physiology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 573 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant Parasitism and Resistance (12 papers), Plant and animal studies (10 papers), Allelopathy and phytotoxic interactions (6 papers), Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis (4 papers), Synthetic Organic Chemistry Methods (3 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers), Oxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions (3 papers) and Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (291 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (180 citations), Plant Science (262 citations), Pharmacology (35 citations) and Inorganic Chemistry (35 citations). Mathilde Lachia has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, United Kingdom and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Alain De Mesmaeker, Christopher J. Moody, Claudio Screpanti, Pierre M. J. Jung, Alexandre Lumbroso, Raymonde Fonné‐Pfister, Stefano Rendine, Cyril Poriel, Philippe Renaud and F. Dénès. Their work appears in journals such as Tetrahedron Letters, Helvetica Chimica Acta, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters, CHIMIA International Journal for Chemistry and Chemical Communications.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact