Mathew H. Chung

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
74 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Mathew H. Chung is a scholar working on Oncology, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mathew H. Chung has authored 74 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 39 papers in Oncology, 38 papers in Surgery and 22 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mathew H. Chung's work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (20 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (8 papers). Mathew H. Chung is often cited by papers focused on Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (20 papers), Breast Cancer Treatment Studies (9 papers) and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis (8 papers). Mathew H. Chung collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. Mathew H. Chung's co-authors include G. Paul Wright, Anton J. Bilchik, David M. Rose, Leland J. Foshag, Thomas F. Wood, David P. Allegra, Hordur M. Kolbeinsson, Sreenivasa R Chandana, Armando E. Giuliano and Ye Wei and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Gastroenterology.

In The Last Decade

Mathew H. Chung

72 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Hit Papers

Pancreatic Cancer: A Revi... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mathew H. Chung United States 23 883 751 466 414 300 74 1.8k
Eran Sadot Israel 25 1.2k 1.4× 1.8k 2.4× 547 1.2× 833 2.0× 516 1.7× 70 2.8k
Ryan S. Turley United States 24 719 0.8× 652 0.9× 289 0.6× 601 1.5× 185 0.6× 61 1.8k
Matthieu Faron France 20 830 0.9× 521 0.7× 241 0.5× 362 0.9× 152 0.5× 96 1.4k
Fabrizio Romano Italy 22 840 1.0× 542 0.7× 382 0.8× 545 1.3× 234 0.8× 89 1.5k
Marcovalerio Melis United States 27 1.4k 1.5× 874 1.2× 123 0.3× 796 1.9× 240 0.8× 70 2.1k
Marloes A.G. Elferink Netherlands 23 665 0.8× 1.3k 1.7× 214 0.5× 419 1.0× 139 0.5× 66 1.7k
M Huguier France 27 1.5k 1.7× 1.3k 1.8× 446 1.0× 1.1k 2.7× 318 1.1× 167 2.6k
Ludger Staib Germany 24 581 0.7× 1.2k 1.6× 129 0.3× 430 1.0× 177 0.6× 73 1.8k
Edward C.S. Lai Hong Kong 23 1.3k 1.5× 580 0.8× 713 1.5× 1.1k 2.8× 337 1.1× 33 2.1k
Sharon M. Weber United States 23 1.5k 1.7× 1.2k 1.7× 305 0.7× 768 1.9× 338 1.1× 47 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Mathew H. Chung

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mathew H. Chung's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mathew H. Chung with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mathew H. Chung more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mathew H. Chung

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mathew H. Chung. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mathew H. Chung. The network helps show where Mathew H. Chung may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mathew H. Chung

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mathew H. Chung. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mathew H. Chung based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mathew H. Chung. Mathew H. Chung is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, Nicole, et al.. (2023). Surgeon Burnout and Usage of Personal Communication Devices: Examining the Technology “Empowerment/Enslavement Paradox”. Journal of Surgical Research. 285. 205–210. 3 indexed citations
2.
Kolbeinsson, Hordur M., et al.. (2023). Can we let our patients sleep in the hospital? A randomized controlled trial of a pragmatic sleep protocol in surgical oncology patients. Journal of Surgical Oncology. 129(4). 827–834. 1 indexed citations
3.
Levine, Anna, et al.. (2023). Timing of mastectomy and the effect on the likelihood of outpatient surgery and cost savings in breast cancer patients. Surgery. 175(3). 671–676. 1 indexed citations
4.
Truong, Thao, et al.. (2022). Timing and necessity of staging imaging in clinical stage II cutaneous melanoma: Cost-effectiveness and clinical decision analysis. The American Journal of Surgery. 225(1). 93–98. 2 indexed citations
6.
7.
Melnik, Marianne K., et al.. (2018). The impact of obesity on treatment choices and outcomes in operable breast cancer. The American Journal of Surgery. 217(3). 474–477. 9 indexed citations
9.
Wright, G. Paul, et al.. (2016). Utility of feeding jejunostomy tubes in pancreaticoduodenectomy. The American Journal of Surgery. 213(3). 530–533. 19 indexed citations
10.
Healy, Mark A., Laurence E. McCahill, Mathew H. Chung, et al.. (2016). Intraoperative Fluid Resuscitation Strategies in Pancreatectomy: Results from 38 Hospitals in Michigan. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(9). 3047–3055. 9 indexed citations
11.
Wright, G. Paul, David Chesla, & Mathew H. Chung. (2015). Using next-generation sequencing to determine potential molecularly guided therapy options for patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The American Journal of Surgery. 211(3). 506–511. 8 indexed citations
12.
Krell, Robert, Bradley N. Reames, Samantha Hendren, et al.. (2015). Surgical Referral for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Survey. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 22(7). 2179–2194. 39 indexed citations
13.
Wright, G. Paul, et al.. (2015). Surgeon specialization impacts the management but not outcomes of acute complicated diverticulitis. The American Journal of Surgery. 211(6). 1035–1040. 14 indexed citations
14.
Wright, G. Paul, et al.. (2015). Left-Sided Breast Irradiation does not Result in Increased Long-Term Cardiac-Related Mortality Among Women Treated with Breast-Conserving Surgery. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 23(4). 1117–1122. 12 indexed citations
15.
Wright, G. Paul, Alan T. Davis, Tracy J. Koehler, Marianne K. Melnik, & Mathew H. Chung. (2014). Hormone Receptor Status Does Not Affect Prognosis in Metaplastic Breast Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis with Comparison to Infiltrating Ductal and Lobular Carcinomas. Annals of Surgical Oncology. 21(11). 3497–3503. 44 indexed citations
16.
Chung, Mathew H., et al.. (2013). Selective Laparoscopic Approach in Suspected Gallbladder Malignancy. JSLS Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. 17(4). 596–601. 2 indexed citations
17.
Zagorski, Stanley, et al.. (2005). The effect of weight loss after gastric bypass on C-reactive protein levels. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 1(2). 81–85. 31 indexed citations
18.
Chung, Mathew H., T. F. Wood, George J. Tsioulias, David M. Rose, & Anton J. Bilchik. (2001). Laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation of unresectable hepatic malignancies. Surgical Endoscopy. 15(9). 1020–1026. 49 indexed citations
19.
Wood, Thomas F., et al.. (2001). Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography are essential for staging intraabdominal neoplasms. Gastroenterology. 120(5). A482–A482. 3 indexed citations
20.
Tsioulias, George J., T. F. Wood, Mathew H. Chung, Donald L. Morton, & Anton J. Bilchik. (2001). Diagnostic laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasonography optimize the staging and resectability of intraabdominal neoplasms. Surgical Endoscopy. 15(9). 1016–1019. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026