Massimo D’Amato

36 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Massimo D’Amato
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 414
  • Gastroenterology 342
  • Rheumatology 122
  • Hepatology 50
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 68
Replace Jorge E. Valenzuela with:
Jorge E. Valenzuela United States
Rune E. Kuhre Denmark
R.D.E. Rumsey United Kingdom
Bernhard Kreymann Germany
H. H. DITSCHUNEIT Germany
Debra A. Stephens United States
Richard F. Harty United States
Armelle Penhoat France
Pietro Antonuccio Italy
Brittany A. Rasmussen Canada
Massimo D’Amato relative to Jorge E. Valenzuela United States Jorge E. Valenzuela's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×8.4×
Jorge E. Valenzuela · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Massimo D’Amato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Massimo D’Amato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Massimo D’Amato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Massimo D’Amato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Massimo D’Amato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Massimo D’Amato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Massimo D’Amato. The network helps show where Massimo D’Amato may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Massimo D’Amato, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Massimo D’Amato Line = papers co-authored together Massimo D’Amato links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1999236
2 2001171
3 2009120
4 2012120
5 1998104
6 1999103
7 2019101
8 200475
9 200675
10 200268
11 200464
12 199860
13 201059
14 201253
15 198840
16 201439
17 201538
18 201430
19 201428
20 199526

About Massimo D’Amato

Massimo D’Amato is a scholar working on Gastroenterology, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Hepatology and Rheumatology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (7 papers), Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology (6 papers), Regulation of Appetite and Obesity (5 papers), Hepatitis C virus research (4 papers), Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (2 papers), Gastroesophageal reflux and treatments (2 papers), Silymarin and Mushroom Poisoning (2 papers) and Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (414 citations), Gastroenterology (342 citations), Rheumatology (122 citations), Hepatology (50 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (68 citations). Massimo D’Amato has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christoph Beglinger, Jürgen Drewe, David G. Thompson, Lucio Claudio Rovati, Graham J. Dockray, John T. McLaughlin, Daniel Matzinger, Giampaolo Giacovelli, Lukas P. Degen and Malcolm N. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as Gastroenterology, American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, European Journal of Pharmacology, British Journal of Pharmacology and American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact