Mary Stewart

608 total citations
9 papers, 416 citations indexed

About

Mary Stewart is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Stewart has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 416 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 3 papers in Control and Systems Engineering and 3 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Mary Stewart's work include Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (3 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (3 papers) and Mining Techniques and Economics (3 papers). Mary Stewart is often cited by papers focused on Sustainable Development and Environmental Policy (3 papers), Environmental Impact and Sustainability (3 papers) and Mining Techniques and Economics (3 papers). Mary Stewart collaborates with scholars based in Australia, South Africa and Switzerland. Mary Stewart's co-authors include Bo P. Weidema, Jim Petrie, Olivier Jolliet, Ruedi Müller‐Wenk, Alan C. Brent, José Potting, Gerald Rebitzer, Helias Udo de Haes, Claudia Peña and David Pennington and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Hazardous Materials, Journal of Cleaner Production and The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

In The Last Decade

Mary Stewart

9 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Stewart Australia 7 246 97 96 89 60 9 416
L.F.C.M. van Oers Netherlands 4 294 1.2× 179 1.8× 131 1.4× 82 0.9× 34 0.6× 6 571
Thomas P. Gloria United States 11 273 1.1× 121 1.2× 45 0.5× 124 1.4× 65 1.1× 17 537
Małgorzata Góralczyk Italy 10 180 0.7× 85 0.9× 65 0.7× 40 0.4× 35 0.6× 20 416
Thomas Sonderegger Switzerland 11 215 0.9× 134 1.4× 166 1.7× 77 0.9× 42 0.7× 14 497
Johan Berg Pettersen Norway 10 121 0.5× 86 0.9× 90 0.9× 97 1.1× 81 1.4× 30 484
Claudia Peña Chile 7 224 0.9× 118 1.2× 53 0.6× 88 1.0× 38 0.6× 8 516
Alejandro Pablo Arena Argentina 11 179 0.7× 98 1.0× 71 0.7× 194 2.2× 31 0.5× 41 495
Ruben Huele Netherlands 10 191 0.8× 142 1.5× 123 1.3× 42 0.5× 19 0.3× 17 458
Benoit Othoniel Luxembourg 5 234 1.0× 60 0.6× 40 0.4× 69 0.8× 39 0.7× 7 444
Pennington David Italy 9 144 0.6× 92 0.9× 93 1.0× 59 0.7× 18 0.3× 17 344

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Stewart

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Stewart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Stewart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Stewart more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Stewart

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Stewart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Stewart. The network helps show where Mary Stewart may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Stewart

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Stewart. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Stewart based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Stewart. Mary Stewart is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Merwe, Werner van der, et al.. (2010). Cr(VI) generation during sample preparation of solid samples – A chromite ore case study. Water SA. 36(1). 14 indexed citations
2.
Stewart, Mary, et al.. (2006). Deportment and management of metals produced during combustion of CCA-treated timbers. Journal of Hazardous Materials. 139(3). 500–505. 6 indexed citations
3.
Stewart, Mary & Jim Petrie. (2005). A process systems approach to life cycle inventories for minerals: South African and Australian case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production. 14(12-13). 1042–1056. 37 indexed citations
4.
Weidema, Bo P., Göran Finnveden, & Mary Stewart. (2005). Impacts from Resource Use - A common position paper. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 10(6). 382–382. 19 indexed citations
5.
Stewart, Mary & Bo P. Weidema. (2004). A Consistent Framework for Assessing the Impacts from Resource Use - A focus on resource functionality (8 pp). The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 10(4). 240–247. 101 indexed citations
6.
Jolliet, Olivier, Ruedi Müller‐Wenk, Jane Bare, et al.. (2004). The LCIA midpoint-damage framework of the UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 9(6). 223 indexed citations
7.
Stewart, Mary & Olivier Jolliet. (2004). User needs analysis and development of priorities for life cycle impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 9(3). 153–160. 7 indexed citations
8.
Stewart, Mary & Jim Petrie. (1999). Planning for waste management and disposal in minerals processing using life cycle assessment. Raw materials report/Minerals & energy./Minerals & energy. 14(4). 14–36. 8 indexed citations
9.
Petersen, Jochen, Mary Stewart, & Jim Petrie. (1999). Management of Ferro‐alloy wastes. Raw materials report/Minerals & energy./Minerals & energy. 14(3). 27–35. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026