Mary Piper

634 total citations
10 papers, 413 citations indexed

About

Mary Piper is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Infectious Diseases. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Piper has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 413 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Clinical Psychology and 1 paper in Infectious Diseases. Recurrent topics in Mary Piper's work include Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). Mary Piper is often cited by papers focused on Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (4 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (4 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (4 papers). Mary Piper collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Jamaica. Mary Piper's co-authors include Jenny Shaw, Louis Appleby, Roger T. Webb, Daniel Pratt, Lisa Marzano, Keith Hawton, Adrienne Rivlin, Seena Fazel, Andrew Forrester and H. M. HODKINSON and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Age and Ageing.

In The Last Decade

Mary Piper

10 papers receiving 391 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary Piper United Kingdom	6	331	254	90	63	38	10	413
John Arianda Owiti United Kingdom	11	263 0.8×	119 0.5×	112 1.2×	75 1.2×	43 1.1×	16	416
Fatos Kaba United States	11	168 0.5×	155 0.6×	103 1.1×	153 2.4×	29 0.8×	15	392
Amanda Butler Canada	12	153 0.5×	192 0.8×	147 1.6×	115 1.8×	37 1.0×	30	403
Alan Felix United States	5	106 0.3×	134 0.5×	395 4.4×	45 0.7×	53 1.4×	8	474
Michele Staton Tindall United States	13	132 0.4×	139 0.5×	198 2.2×	198 3.1×	20 0.5×	19	395
Sofia Kennedy United States	9	133 0.4×	246 1.0×	271 3.0×	155 2.5×	27 0.7×	12	447
Mo Korchinski Canada	9	109 0.3×	124 0.5×	140 1.6×	64 1.0×	20 0.5×	19	312
Joel Rosenthal United States	10	194 0.6×	96 0.4×	118 1.3×	75 1.2×	14 0.4×	23	328
Carolina Vélez‐Grau United States	9	105 0.3×	94 0.4×	127 1.4×	70 1.1×	44 1.2×	22	295
Elizabeth W. Jackson United States	7	306 0.9×	49 0.2×	202 2.2×	130 2.1×	12 0.3×	7	445

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Piper

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Piper's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Piper with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Piper more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Piper

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Piper. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Piper. The network helps show where Mary Piper may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Piper

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Piper. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Piper based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Piper. Mary Piper is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Forrester, Andrew & Mary Piper. (2020). The WPA's prison health position statement and curriculum. World Psychiatry. 19(1). 125–125. 3 indexed citations

2.

Piper, Mary, Andrew Forrester, & Jenny Shaw. (2019). Prison healthcare services: the need for political courage. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 215(4). 579–581. 12 indexed citations

3.

Marzano, Lisa, et al.. (2016). Prevention of Suicidal Behavior in Prisons. Crisis. 37(5). 323–334. 87 indexed citations

4.

King, Carlene, Jane Senior, Roger T. Webb, et al.. (2015). Suicide by people in a community justice pathway: Population-based nested case–control study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 207(2). 175–176. 23 indexed citations

5.

Webb, Roger T., et al.. (2012). A national case–control study of risk factors among prisoners in England and Wales. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology. 48(7). 1177–1185. 53 indexed citations

6.

Pratt, Daniel, Mary Piper, Louis Appleby, Roger T. Webb, & Jenny Shaw. (2006). Suicide in recently released prisoners: a population-based cohort study. The Lancet. 368(9530). 119–123. 205 indexed citations

7.

Piper, Mary, et al.. (1985). DIARRHOEA DUE TO ENTEROTOXIGENIC CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS: CLINICAL FEATURES AND MANAGEMENT OF A CLUSTER OF TEN CASES. Age and Ageing. 14(5). 296–302. 22 indexed citations

8.

HODKINSON, H. M. & Mary Piper. (1981). CLINICAL AND LABORATORY PROFILE INFORMATION IN THE PREDICTION OF DEATH IN ELDERLY PATIENTS. Age and Ageing. 10(1). 10–13. 4 indexed citations

9.

Piper, Mary. (1979). CONFERENCE ON THE AGEING BRAIN. Age and Ageing. 8(4). 299–302. 1 indexed citations

10.

Piper, Mary & H. M. HODKINSON. (1979). PREDICTION OF OUTCOME OF PATIENTS ADMITTED TO A GERIATRIC DEPARTMENT. Age and Ageing. 8(1). 36–40. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact