Mary Penry

461 total citations
17 papers, 318 citations indexed

About

Mary Penry is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Penry has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 318 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mary Penry's work include Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Mary Penry is often cited by papers focused on Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (12 papers), Birth, Development, and Health (6 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (5 papers). Mary Penry collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Mary Penry's co-authors include Alexander D. Kofinas, Melissa Swain, Christos G. Hatjis, Lewis H. Nelson, Frank C. Greiss, Mark A. Espeland, Eberhard Mueller‐Heubach, Paul J. Meis, Jean‐Claude Veille and Penny C. Sharp and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics and American Journal of Perinatology.

In The Last Decade

Mary Penry

16 papers receiving 301 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary Penry United States 12 262 252 40 31 31 17 318
C. M. COOK Australia 8 254 1.0× 255 1.0× 94 2.4× 47 1.5× 38 1.2× 13 366
Daniel P. Eller United States 10 94 0.4× 156 0.6× 36 0.9× 49 1.6× 50 1.6× 18 261
Jan Laurin Sweden 8 205 0.8× 200 0.8× 49 1.2× 18 0.6× 35 1.1× 11 297
T. Eikeland Norway 4 197 0.8× 148 0.6× 28 0.7× 26 0.8× 8 0.3× 7 324
Valeria Bezzeccheri Italy 11 233 0.9× 196 0.8× 33 0.8× 33 1.1× 48 1.5× 16 289
Annette Bombrys United States 7 282 1.1× 308 1.2× 20 0.5× 15 0.5× 15 0.5× 11 365
Michelle Kush United States 8 140 0.5× 189 0.8× 85 2.1× 9 0.3× 35 1.1× 15 285
Charles M. McCurdy United States 9 145 0.6× 172 0.7× 26 0.7× 18 0.6× 22 0.7× 12 263
Dana Block‐Abraham United States 10 213 0.8× 233 0.9× 33 0.8× 17 0.5× 33 1.1× 19 304
Timo Ekhart Netherlands 10 335 1.3× 253 1.0× 33 0.8× 119 3.8× 12 0.4× 14 410

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Penry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Penry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Penry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Penry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Penry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Penry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Penry. The network helps show where Mary Penry may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Penry

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Penry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Penry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Penry. Mary Penry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Penry, Mary. (2018). The Letters of Mary Penry. Penn State University Press eBooks.
2.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mary Penry, & Christos G. Hatjis. (1994). Compliance-weight deficit index. Combining umbilical artery resistance and growth deficit for predicting intrauterine growth retardation and poor perinatal outcome.. PubMed. 39(8). 595–600. 3 indexed citations
3.
Penry, Mary, et al.. (1993). Fetal renal pulsed Doppler waveform in prolonged pregnancies. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 169(4). 882–884. 21 indexed citations
4.
Kofinas, Alexander D., et al.. (1992). Interrelationship and clinical significance of increasedresistance in the uterine arteries in patients with hypertension or preeclampsia or both. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 166(2). 601–606. 28 indexed citations
5.
Veille, Jean‐Claude & Mary Penry. (1992). Effects of maternal administration of 3% carbon dioxide on umbilical artery and fetal renal and middle cerebral artery Doppler waveforms. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 167(6). 1668–1671. 12 indexed citations
6.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mark A. Espeland, Mary Penry, Melissa Swain, & Christos G. Hatjis. (1992). Uteroplacental Doppler Flow Velocity Waveform Indices in Normal Pregnancy: A Statistical Exercise and the Development of Appropriate Reference Values. American Journal of Perinatology. 9(2). 94–101. 30 indexed citations
7.
Penry, Mary, et al.. (1992). Interrelationship and clinical significance of increased resistance in the uterine arteries in patients with hypertension or preeclampsia or both. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 39(2). 161–161. 8 indexed citations
8.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mary Penry, & Melissa Swain. (1991). Uteroplacental Doppler Flow Velocity Waveform Analysis Correlates Poorly with Glycemic Control in Diabetic Pregnant Women. American Journal of Perinatology. 8(4). 273–277. 16 indexed citations
9.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mary Penry, & Christos G. Hatjis. (1991). Umbilical vessel flow velocity waveforms in cord entanglement in a monoamnionic multiple gestation. A case report.. PubMed. 36(4). 314–6. 11 indexed citations
10.
Kofinas, Alexander D., et al.. (1990). Uterine and Umbilical Artery Flow Velocity Waveform Analysis in Pregnancies Complicated by Chronic Hypertension or Preeclampsia. Southern Medical Journal. 83(2). 150–155. 15 indexed citations
11.
Penry, Mary, et al.. (1990). Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics. 33(2). 188–188. 16 indexed citations
12.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mark A. Espeland, Melissa Swain, Mary Penry, & Lewis H. Nelson. (1989). Correcting umbilical artery flow velocity waveforms for fetal heart rate is unnecessary. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 160(3). 704–707. 16 indexed citations
13.
Hatjis, Christos G., et al.. (1989). Oxytocin, Vasopressin, and Prolactin Responses Associated With Nipple Stimulation. Southern Medical Journal. 82(2). 193–196. 4 indexed citations
14.
Kofinas, Alexander D., Mary Penry, Melissa Swain, & Christos G. Hatjis. (1989). Effect of placental laterality on uterine artery resistance and development of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth retardation. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 161(6). 1536–1539. 56 indexed citations
15.
Kofinas, Alexander D., et al.. (1988). The effect of placental location on uterine artery flow velocity waveforms. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 159(6). 1504–1508. 62 indexed citations
16.
Meis, Paul J., et al.. (1986). Variable decelerations during nonstress tests are not a sign of fetal compromise. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 154(3). 586–590. 18 indexed citations
17.
Nelson, Lewis H., Stephen G. Anderson, & Mary Penry. (1984). The wavering midline: A diagnostic sign of fetal hydrocephalus. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 149(6). 662–665. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026