Mary M. Rodgers

7.9k total citations · 2 hit papers
77 papers, 5.4k citations indexed

About

Mary M. Rodgers is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Pathology and Forensic Medicine and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary M. Rodgers has authored 77 papers receiving a total of 5.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 28 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine and 20 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Mary M. Rodgers's work include Spinal Cord Injury Research (24 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (19 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (15 papers). Mary M. Rodgers is often cited by papers focused on Spinal Cord Injury Research (24 papers), Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (19 papers) and Muscle activation and electromyography studies (15 papers). Mary M. Rodgers collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Canada. Mary M. Rodgers's co-authors include Peter R. Cavanagh, Leighton Chan, Paolo Bonato, Hyung Park, Shyamal Patel, R. M. Glaser, Margaret Finley, Richard Conroy, Vinay Pai and Randall E. Keyser and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Mary M. Rodgers

72 papers receiving 5.0k citations

Hit Papers

A review of wearable sens... 1987 2026 2000 2013 2012 1987 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary M. Rodgers United States 32 2.7k 1.1k 1.0k 969 845 77 5.4k
Fong‐Chin Su Taiwan 40 1.8k 0.7× 428 0.4× 1.2k 1.2× 1.0k 1.0× 881 1.0× 332 5.7k
Judith M. Burnfield United States 22 2.9k 1.0× 290 0.3× 1.1k 1.1× 710 0.7× 1.1k 1.4× 88 4.6k
David E. Krebs United States 45 2.0k 0.7× 368 0.3× 796 0.8× 622 0.6× 1.3k 1.6× 115 5.8k
Ge Wu United States 22 1.9k 0.7× 358 0.3× 1.1k 1.0× 814 0.8× 677 0.8× 60 5.8k
Maria Grazia Benedetti Italy 40 3.0k 1.1× 517 0.5× 2.0k 1.9× 448 0.5× 1.1k 1.3× 207 6.7k
Manuela Galli Italy 42 1.6k 0.6× 421 0.4× 754 0.7× 1.0k 1.1× 2.6k 3.1× 400 6.8k
Malcolm Granat United Kingdom 42 1.6k 0.6× 529 0.5× 243 0.2× 1.1k 1.2× 1.1k 1.3× 165 7.1k
Maury A. Nussbaum United States 48 3.4k 1.2× 385 0.4× 1.6k 1.5× 1.1k 1.1× 586 0.7× 335 8.4k
Jaap Harlaar Netherlands 44 3.2k 1.2× 393 0.4× 1.2k 1.2× 1.1k 1.1× 2.4k 2.9× 270 6.7k
Miloš R. Popović Canada 48 3.9k 1.4× 1.7k 1.6× 517 0.5× 1.8k 1.9× 1.1k 1.2× 317 7.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary M. Rodgers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary M. Rodgers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary M. Rodgers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary M. Rodgers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary M. Rodgers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary M. Rodgers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary M. Rodgers. The network helps show where Mary M. Rodgers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary M. Rodgers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary M. Rodgers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary M. Rodgers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary M. Rodgers. Mary M. Rodgers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rodgers, Mary M., et al.. (2019). Wearable technologies for active living and rehabilitation: Current research challenges and future opportunities. Journal of Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies Engineering. 6. 2482693495–2482693495. 72 indexed citations
2.
Pai, Vinay, et al.. (2013). Workshop on using natural language processing applications for enhancing clinical decision making: an executive summary. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 21(e1). e2–e5. 16 indexed citations
3.
Cowan, Rachel E., Benjamin J. Fregly, Michael L. Boninger, et al.. (2012). Recent trends in assistive technology for mobility. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 9(1). 20–20. 124 indexed citations
4.
Patel, Shyamal, Hyung Park, Paolo Bonato, Leighton Chan, & Mary M. Rodgers. (2012). A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 9(1). 21–21. 1532 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Rodgers, Mary M., Zohara A. Cohen, Lyndon Joseph, & Winifred K. Rossi. (2012). Workshop on Personal Motion Technologies for Healthy Independent Living: Executive Summary. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 93(6). 935–939. 4 indexed citations
6.
Gilligan, Dean M., et al.. (2010). The distribution and abundance of two endangered fish species in the NSW Upper Murray Catchment.. 8 indexed citations
7.
Patterson, Shawnna L., Larry W. Forrester, Mary M. Rodgers, et al.. (2007). Determinants of Walking Function After Stroke: Differences by Deficit Severity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 88(1). 115–119. 284 indexed citations
8.
Mizelle, J. C., Mary M. Rodgers, & Larry W. Forrester. (2005). Bilateral foot center of pressure measures predict hemiparetic gait velocity. Gait & Posture. 24(3). 356–363. 42 indexed citations
9.
Rodgers, Mary M., Kevin J. McQuade, Elizabeth K. Rasch, Randall E. Keyser, & Margaret Finley. (2003). Upper-limb fatigue-related joint power shifts in experienced wheelchair users and nonwheelchair users. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 40(1). 27–27. 47 indexed citations
10.
Rodgers, Mary M.. (2003). Publishing Children's Nonfiction. 41(1). 37–38.
11.
Rasch, Elizabeth K., et al.. (2003). Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 40(4). 301–301. 45 indexed citations
12.
Rodgers, Mary M., et al.. (1993). Three-dimensional dynamic analysis of joint reaction forces and moments during wheelchair propulsion. Journal of Biomechanics. 26(3). 346–346. 7 indexed citations
13.
Hooker, Steven P., et al.. (1992). Metabolic and hemodynamic responses to concurrent voluntary arm crank and electrical stimulation leg cycle exercise in quadriplegics. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 29(3). 1–1. 66 indexed citations
14.
Mathews, Thomas, R. M. Glaser, Stephen F. Figoni, et al.. (1991). [114] Evaluation of FES techniques for exercise. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 28(1). 97–98. 1 indexed citations
15.
Rodgers, Mary M., et al.. (1991). Our endangered planet, groundwater. 1 indexed citations
16.
Rodgers, Mary M., et al.. (1991). Our endangered planet, Oceans.
17.
Rodgers, Mary M. & Peter R. Cavanagh. (1989). Pressure distribution on Morton??s foot structure. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. 21(1). 23–28. 40 indexed citations
18.
Rodgers, Mary M.. (1988). Dynamic Biomechanics of the Normal Foot and Ankle During Walking and Running. Physical Therapy. 68(12). 1822–1830. 124 indexed citations
19.
Rodgers, Mary M.. (1986). Plantar pressure distribution measurement during barefoot walking : normal values and predictive equations. 15 indexed citations
20.
Cavanagh, Peter R., et al.. (1985). An Approach to Biomechanical Profiling of Elite Distance Runners. 1(1). 36–62. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026