Mary Jo Smith

676 total citations
8 papers, 531 citations indexed

About

Mary Jo Smith is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Applied Psychology and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary Jo Smith has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 531 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Epidemiology, 2 papers in Applied Psychology and 1 paper in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mary Jo Smith's work include Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (1 paper). Mary Jo Smith is often cited by papers focused on Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (1 paper). Mary Jo Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Ireland. Mary Jo Smith's co-authors include Richard O. Scott, Antonia Abbey, Sue Hacking, Claudia M. Klier, Margaret R. Oates, Birgitta Wickberg, John Cox, Nine M.-C. Glangeaud-Freudenthal, Vania Valoriani and Stella Neema and has published in prestigious journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Addiction and American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology.

In The Last Decade

Mary Jo Smith

8 papers receiving 489 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary Jo Smith United States	7	227	176	168	102	72	8	531
Erikson Felipe Furtado Brazil	15	321 1.4×	130 0.7×	124 0.7×	246 2.4×	97 1.3×	65	917
Robin Schectman United States	9	75 0.3×	301 1.7×	109 0.6×	138 1.4×	93 1.3×	10	717
Erin Delker United States	12	163 0.7×	122 0.7×	105 0.6×	127 1.2×	49 0.7×	32	540
Marlein Ausems Netherlands	13	47 0.2×	98 0.6×	259 1.5×	91 0.9×	44 0.6×	18	566
Patricia J. Estok United States	14	37 0.2×	148 0.8×	117 0.7×	92 0.9×	50 0.7×	35	547
Debra Rubinstein United States	8	124 0.5×	249 1.4×	104 0.6×	109 1.1×	123 1.7×	11	782
Irina Matytsina Denmark	8	155 0.7×	105 0.6×	55 0.3×	101 1.0×	83 1.2×	16	516
Allyson J. Peller United States	12	88 0.4×	402 2.3×	92 0.5×	31 0.3×	19 0.3×	19	677
Hazel Pilgrim United Kingdom	14	162 0.7×	676 3.8×	62 0.4×	225 2.2×	121 1.7×	23	1.2k
Konstantinos Kotsis Greece	13	41 0.2×	259 1.5×	51 0.3×	89 0.9×	75 1.0×	33	713

Countries citing papers authored by Mary Jo Smith

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary Jo Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary Jo Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary Jo Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary Jo Smith

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary Jo Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary Jo Smith. The network helps show where Mary Jo Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary Jo Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary Jo Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary Jo Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary Jo Smith. Mary Jo Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Ye, Xiaoling, et al.. (2014). Improvement in Loss to Follow-up of Newborn Hearing Screening: A lesson from Louisiana Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Program. Online Journal of Public Health Informatics. 6(1). 1 indexed citations

Cowen, Mark E., Robert L. Strawderman, Jennifer Czerwinski, Mary Jo Smith, & Lakshmi Halasyamani. (2012). Mortality predictions on admission as a context for organizing care activities. Journal of Hospital Medicine. 8(5). 229–235. 24 indexed citations

North, Nigel, et al.. (2010). Examining the effect of spinal cord injury on emotional awareness, expressivity and memory for emotional material. Psychology Health & Medicine. 15(4). 406–419. 9 indexed citations

Kelly, Margaret M., Richard Leigh, Philippe Bonniaud, et al.. (2004). Epithelial Expression of Profibrotic Mediators in a Model of Allergen-Induced Airway Remodeling. American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. 32(2). 99–107. 58 indexed citations

Oates, Margaret R., John Cox, Stella Neema, et al.. (2004). Postnatal depression across countries and cultures: a qualitative study. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 184(S46). s10–s16. 169 indexed citations

Smith, Mary Jo, Antonia Abbey, & Richard O. Scott. (1993). Reasons for Drinking Alcohol: Their Relationship to Psychosocial Variables and Alcohol Consumption. International Journal of the Addictions. 28(9). 881–908. 64 indexed citations

Abbey, Antonia, Richard O. Scott, & Mary Jo Smith. (1993). Physical, subjective, and social availability: their relationship to alcohol consumption in rural and urban areas. Addiction. 88(4). 489–499. 42 indexed citations

Abbey, Antonia, Mary Jo Smith, & Richard O. Scott. (1993). The relationship between reasons for drinking alcohol and alcohol consumption: An interactional approach. Addictive Behaviors. 18(6). 659–670. 164 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact