Mary H. Williams

2.0k total citations · 1 hit paper
36 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Mary H. Williams is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Philosophy. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary H. Williams has authored 36 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Clinical Psychology, 7 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 7 papers in Philosophy. Recurrent topics in Mary H. Williams's work include Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers). Mary H. Williams is often cited by papers focused on Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (9 papers), Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (7 papers) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (7 papers). Mary H. Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Mary H. Williams's co-authors include Mary Corey, F. John McLaughlin, Henry Levison, Joseph D. Bloom, Wallace J. Matthews, Harvey R. Colten, Douglas A. Bigelow, William Bruce Wheeler, Raif S. Geha and Jeffrey L. Rogers and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, The Lancet and American Journal of Psychiatry.

In The Last Decade

Mary H. Williams

34 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

A comparison of survival,... 1988 2026 2000 2013 1988 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary H. Williams United States 15 946 346 322 161 115 36 1.5k
Louise Gee United Kingdom 11 535 0.6× 185 0.5× 189 0.6× 20 0.1× 29 0.3× 15 732
James L. Sutphen United States 24 124 0.1× 232 0.7× 138 0.4× 116 0.7× 147 1.3× 62 1.6k
Jennifer Henderson Australia 13 128 0.1× 168 0.5× 52 0.2× 129 0.8× 397 3.5× 33 918
Melinda A. Lee United States 13 36 0.0× 77 0.2× 464 1.4× 48 0.3× 190 1.7× 21 1.8k
Hui-Chuan Lai United States 10 857 0.9× 180 0.5× 52 0.2× 160 1.0× 130 1.1× 10 1.3k
Angelika Kindermann Netherlands 28 93 0.1× 285 0.8× 135 0.4× 197 1.2× 437 3.8× 84 1.7k
Mandy Bryon United Kingdom 13 446 0.5× 147 0.4× 107 0.3× 22 0.1× 98 0.9× 30 750
Jane Morton United States 10 111 0.1× 325 0.9× 87 0.3× 435 2.7× 742 6.5× 28 1.1k
Vildan Ertekin Türkiye 18 43 0.0× 115 0.3× 214 0.7× 120 0.7× 326 2.8× 63 1.1k
R Kornfält Sweden 17 531 0.6× 43 0.1× 43 0.1× 24 0.1× 168 1.5× 41 941

Countries citing papers authored by Mary H. Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary H. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary H. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary H. Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary H. Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary H. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary H. Williams. The network helps show where Mary H. Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary H. Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary H. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary H. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary H. Williams. Mary H. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dorahy, Martin J., et al.. (2015). Child abuse and neglect in complex dissociative disorder, abuse-related chronic PTSD, and mixed psychiatric samples. Journal of Trauma & Dissociation. 17(2). 223–236. 29 indexed citations
2.
3.
Bloom, Joseph D., Mary H. Williams, & Douglas A. Bigelow. (2000). The Forensic Psychiatric System in the United States. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 23(5-6). 605–613. 14 indexed citations
4.
Bloom, Joseph D., et al.. (1998). Changes in Public Psychiatric Hospitalization in Oregon Over the Past Two Decades. Psychiatric Services. 49(3). 366–369. 11 indexed citations
5.
Bloom, Joseph D., et al.. (1997). Treatment refusal procedures and service utilization: a comparison of involuntarily hospitalized populations.. PubMed. 25(3). 349–57. 4 indexed citations
6.
Bloom, Joseph D., et al.. (1994). Tort Liability Coverage for Community Providers Who Serve Insanity Acquittees. Psychiatric Services. 45(9). 933–935. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bloom, Joseph D., Mary H. Williams, & Douglas A. Bigelow. (1992). The Involvement of Schizophrenic Insanity Acquittees in the Mental Health and Criminal Justice Systems. Psychiatric Clinics of North America. 15(3). 591–604. 8 indexed citations
8.
Bigelow, Douglas A., et al.. (1990). Economic grand rounds: Costs of managing insanity acquittees under a psychiatric security review board system. 41(6). 613–614. 11 indexed citations
9.
Miller, William H., et al.. (1990). The pregnant psychiatric inpatient: A missed opportunity. General Hospital Psychiatry. 12(6). 373–378. 17 indexed citations
10.
Bigelow, Douglas A., Joseph D. Bloom, & Mary H. Williams. (1990). Costs of Managing Insanity Acquittees Under a Psychiatric Security Review Board System. Psychiatric Services. 41(6). 613–614. 12 indexed citations
11.
Williams, Mary H. & Joseph D. Bloom. (1989). Mental health services research with forensic populations. New Directions for Mental Health Services. 1989(44). 83–95. 3 indexed citations
12.
Kofoed, Lial, et al.. (1989). Physicians investigated for inappropriate prescribing by the Oregon Board of Medical Examiners.. PubMed. 150(5). 597–601. 12 indexed citations
13.
Corey, Mary, F. John McLaughlin, Mary H. Williams, & Henry Levison. (1988). A comparison of survival, growth, and pulmonary function in patients with cystic fibrosis in Boston and Toronto. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 41(6). 583–591. 597 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Bloom, Joseph D., et al.. (1988). The influence of the right to refuse treatment on precommitment patients.. PubMed. 16(1). 5–9. 6 indexed citations
15.
Williams, Mary H., et al.. (1988). Drug treatment refusal and length of hospitalization of insanity acquittees.. PubMed. 16(3). 279–84. 2 indexed citations
16.
Bloom, Joseph D., Jeffrey L. Rogers, Spero M. Manson, & Mary H. Williams. (1986). Lifetime police contacts of discharged psychiatric security review board clients. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry. 8(2). 189–202. 25 indexed citations
17.
Wheeler, William Bruce, Mary H. Williams, Wallace J. Matthews, & Harvey R. Colten. (1984). Progression of cystic fibrosis lung disease as a function of serum immunoglobulin G levels: A 5-year longitudinal study. The Journal of Pediatrics. 104(5). 695–699. 92 indexed citations
18.
Carey, William D., et al.. (1983). Drug and treatment efficacy of chenodeoxycholic acid in 97 patients with cholelithiasis and increased surgical risk. Digestive Diseases and Sciences. 28(6). 545–551. 17 indexed citations
19.
Colp, Charlotte & Mary H. Williams. (1973). Total occlusion of airways producing a restrictive pattern of ventilatory impairment.. PubMed. 108(1). 118–22. 13 indexed citations
20.
Bradley, Walter G., et al.. (1972). Treatment of muscular dystrophy.. BMJ. 3(5828). 699.2–700.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026