Mary E. Stromberger

4.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
49 papers, 3.3k citations indexed

About

Mary E. Stromberger is a scholar working on Soil Science, Ecology and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Stromberger has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 3.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 33 papers in Soil Science, 13 papers in Ecology and 13 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Stromberger's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (31 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (11 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (6 papers). Mary E. Stromberger is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (31 papers), Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics (11 papers) and Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions (6 papers). Mary E. Stromberger collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Brazil. Mary E. Stromberger's co-authors include Matthew D. Wallenstein, Robert L. Sinsabaugh, Michael Weintraub, Jürgen Marxsen, Richard G. Burns, Jared L. DeForest, Annamaria Zoppini, James A. Ippolito, R.D. Lentz and Ingrid C. Burke and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemosphere, Soil Biology and Biochemistry and Soil Science Society of America Journal.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Stromberger

49 papers receiving 3.2k citations

Hit Papers

Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge... 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary E. Stromberger United States 23 1.9k 1.0k 964 505 434 49 3.3k
Eduardo de Sá Mendonça Brazil 34 2.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.1× 768 0.8× 397 0.8× 430 1.0× 200 4.1k
Yirong Su China 35 2.5k 1.3× 1.1k 1.0× 1.2k 1.2× 671 1.3× 294 0.7× 128 3.6k
Franz Buegger Germany 33 2.2k 1.2× 1.4k 1.3× 1.1k 1.1× 781 1.5× 323 0.7× 91 3.9k
Pratap Bhattacharyya India 36 1.8k 1.0× 1.5k 1.4× 691 0.7× 415 0.8× 335 0.8× 121 3.6k
Elke Schulz Germany 29 1.7k 0.9× 791 0.8× 916 1.0× 516 1.0× 326 0.8× 59 2.9k
Zubin Xie China 33 2.4k 1.3× 934 0.9× 807 0.8× 513 1.0× 550 1.3× 74 3.9k
Timothy A. Doane United States 25 1.7k 0.9× 695 0.7× 832 0.9× 827 1.6× 407 0.9× 46 3.0k
A. Ghani New Zealand 21 2.3k 1.2× 804 0.8× 1.2k 1.3× 874 1.7× 412 0.9× 42 3.6k
Jing Tian China 37 2.3k 1.2× 1.1k 1.0× 1.4k 1.4× 587 1.2× 484 1.1× 100 3.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Stromberger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Stromberger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Stromberger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Stromberger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Stromberger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Stromberger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Stromberger. The network helps show where Mary E. Stromberger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Stromberger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Stromberger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Stromberger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Stromberger. Mary E. Stromberger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2025). Fertilizer selection influences soil microbial communities in alluvial and peat soils of the tropics. Agrosystems Geosciences & Environment. 8(1). 1 indexed citations
2.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2023). Soil Microbial Community Responses to Cyanobacteria versus Traditional Organic Fertilizers. Agriculture. 13(10). 1902–1902. 5 indexed citations
3.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2020). Soil physicochemical and biological profiles as indicators for Araucaria forest disturbance levels. Applied Soil Ecology. 158. 103794–103794. 5 indexed citations
4.
Rosenzweig, S., Mary E. Stromberger, & Meagan E. Schipanski. (2018). Intensified dryland crop rotations support greater grain production with fewer inputs. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 264. 63–72. 38 indexed citations
5.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2017). Genotype-Specific Enrichment of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid Deaminase-Positive Bacteria in Winter Wheat Rhizospheres. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 81(4). 796–805. 19 indexed citations
6.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2015). Stabilizing effect of biochar on soil extracellular enzymes after a denaturing stress. Chemosphere. 142. 114–119. 52 indexed citations
7.
Ippolito, James A., Mary E. Stromberger, R.D. Lentz, & Robert S. Dungan. (2015). Hardwood biochar and manure co-application to a calcareous soil. Chemosphere. 142. 84–91. 47 indexed citations
8.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2015). Contrasting effects of biochar versus manure on soil microbial communities and enzyme activities in an Aridisol. Chemosphere. 142. 145–152. 215 indexed citations
9.
Azevedo, Lucas Carvalho Basilio, et al.. (2015). Soil properties discriminating Araucaria forests with different disturbance levels. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment. 187(4). 4 indexed citations
10.
Bell, Colin, Mary E. Stromberger, & Matthew D. Wallenstein. (2013). New insights into enzymes in the environment. Biogeochemistry. 117(1). 1–4. 12 indexed citations
11.
Drijber, Rhae A., et al.. (2013). Changes in Ecosystem Carbon Following Afforestation of Native Sand Prairie. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 77(5). 1613–1624. 13 indexed citations
12.
Wallenstein, Matthew D., Mary E. Stromberger, & Colin Bell. (2012). Bridging the gap between modelers and experimentalists. Eos. 93(32). 312–312. 2 indexed citations
13.
Burns, Richard G., Jared L. DeForest, Jürgen Marxsen, et al.. (2012). Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 58. 216–234. 1689 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Busby, Ryan R., et al.. (2012). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal community differs between a coexisting native shrub and introduced annual grass. Mycorrhiza. 23(2). 129–141. 46 indexed citations
16.
Hurisso, Tunsisa T., et al.. (2011). Earthworm abundance and species composition in organic forage production systems of northern Colorado receiving different soil amendments. Applied Soil Ecology. 48(2). 219–226. 17 indexed citations
17.
Stromberger, Mary E., et al.. (2008). Soil Scarification and Wildfire Interactions and Effects on Microbial Communities and Carbon. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 72(1). 111–118. 36 indexed citations
18.
Freeman, Chris, et al.. (2008). BIOSOLIDS USE FOR RECLAIMING FLUVIAL MINE TAILINGS. Northwest Irrigation & Soils Research Laboratory Publications (United States Department of Agriculture). 1 indexed citations
19.
Massman, W. J., et al.. (2006). Long term consequences of a controlled slash burn and slash mastication to soil moisture and CO2 at a southern Colorado site. 8 indexed citations
20.
Roesner, Larry A., et al.. (2005). Experimental Design of a Long-Term Study on Landscape Irrigation Using Household Graywater. 18. 1–12. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026