Mary E. Lambo

982 total citations
6 papers, 649 citations indexed

About

Mary E. Lambo is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Lambo has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 649 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 2 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Lambo's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Mary E. Lambo is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers), Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (4 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers). Mary E. Lambo collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mary E. Lambo's co-authors include Gina G. Turrigiano, Keith B. Hengen, Donald B. Katz, Stephen D. Van Hooser, Melanie Gainey, Arianna Maffei, Kazuma Noguchi, Joseph D. Dougherty, Xia Ge and Jiayang Chen and has published in prestigious journals such as Neuron, Journal of Neuroscience and Cell Reports.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Lambo

6 papers receiving 642 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary E. Lambo United States 6 524 401 222 64 57 6 649
Ikuko T. Smith United States 8 525 1.0× 434 1.1× 202 0.9× 67 1.0× 41 0.7× 12 778
Cuiping Tian China 9 632 1.2× 314 0.8× 418 1.9× 47 0.7× 43 0.8× 11 860
Wenqin Hu China 6 490 0.9× 222 0.6× 332 1.5× 38 0.6× 38 0.7× 7 661
Rebekah Corlew United States 6 591 1.1× 345 0.9× 248 1.1× 62 1.0× 43 0.8× 9 657
Homare Yamahachi Switzerland 8 402 0.8× 346 0.9× 149 0.7× 51 0.8× 86 1.5× 11 626
Laure Fronzaroli‐Molinières France 13 447 0.9× 281 0.7× 218 1.0× 41 0.6× 36 0.6× 15 646
Elaine Tring United States 12 627 1.2× 597 1.5× 229 1.0× 39 0.6× 78 1.4× 15 839
Bertalan K. Andrásfalvy United States 10 625 1.2× 369 0.9× 218 1.0× 73 1.1× 46 0.8× 10 728
Keith B. Hengen United States 11 559 1.1× 621 1.5× 221 1.0× 91 1.4× 100 1.8× 25 981
Joanna Urban‐Ciećko Poland 13 656 1.3× 502 1.3× 265 1.2× 35 0.5× 74 1.3× 25 852

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Lambo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Lambo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Lambo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Lambo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Lambo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Lambo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Lambo. The network helps show where Mary E. Lambo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Lambo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Lambo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Lambo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Lambo. Mary E. Lambo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

6 of 6 papers shown
1.
Chen, Jiayang, Mary E. Lambo, Xia Ge, et al.. (2021). A MYT1L syndrome mouse model recapitulates patient phenotypes and reveals altered brain development due to disrupted neuronal maturation. Neuron. 109(23). 3775–3792.e14. 35 indexed citations
2.
Tatavarty, Vedakumar, Ken Sugino, Yasuyuki Shima, et al.. (2016). Upregulation of μ3A Drives Homeostatic Plasticity by Rerouting AMPAR into the Recycling Endosomal Pathway. Cell Reports. 16(10). 2711–2722. 18 indexed citations
3.
Lambo, Mary E. & Gina G. Turrigiano. (2013). Synaptic and Intrinsic Homeostatic Mechanisms Cooperate to Increase L2/3 Pyramidal Neuron Excitability during a Late Phase of Critical Period Plasticity. Journal of Neuroscience. 33(20). 8810–8819. 108 indexed citations
4.
Hengen, Keith B., Mary E. Lambo, Stephen D. Van Hooser, Donald B. Katz, & Gina G. Turrigiano. (2013). Firing Rate Homeostasis in Visual Cortex of Freely Behaving Rodents. Neuron. 80(2). 335–342. 239 indexed citations
5.
Maffei, Arianna, Mary E. Lambo, & Gina G. Turrigiano. (2010). Critical Period for Inhibitory Plasticity in RodentBinocular V1. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(9). 3304–3309. 68 indexed citations
6.
Gainey, Melanie, et al.. (2009). Synaptic Scaling Requires the GluR2 Subunit of the AMPA Receptor. Journal of Neuroscience. 29(20). 6479–6489. 181 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026