Mary E. Cain

1.7k total citations
44 papers, 897 citations indexed

About

Mary E. Cain is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary E. Cain has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 897 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 23 papers in Social Psychology and 19 papers in Behavioral Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Mary E. Cain's work include Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (29 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (23 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (19 papers). Mary E. Cain is often cited by papers focused on Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (29 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (23 papers) and Stress Responses and Cortisol (19 papers). Mary E. Cain collaborates with scholars based in United States and Israel. Mary E. Cain's co-authors include Michael T. Bardo, Donald A. Saucier, Stephen W. Scheff, Thomas A. Green, Stephen W. Kiefer, Gerald A. Deehan, Michael B. Thompson, Matthew I. Palmatier, Bruce S. Kapp and Andrew T. Marshall and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mary E. Cain

43 papers receiving 883 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mary E. Cain United States 16 590 292 262 166 156 44 897
Wendy A. Koss United States 18 317 0.5× 253 0.9× 419 1.6× 119 0.7× 194 1.2× 21 954
Margarita Moreno Spain 19 609 1.0× 222 0.8× 133 0.5× 189 1.1× 254 1.6× 57 1.2k
Blair J. Hoplight United States 15 503 0.9× 92 0.3× 121 0.5× 208 1.3× 271 1.7× 25 1.0k
Brandi J. Mattson United States 12 593 1.0× 389 1.3× 189 0.7× 275 1.7× 276 1.8× 15 1.0k
Alberto A. Rasia‐Filho Brazil 22 425 0.7× 510 1.7× 509 1.9× 144 0.9× 336 2.2× 69 1.4k
Jorge Manzo Mexico 22 312 0.5× 417 1.4× 165 0.6× 206 1.2× 233 1.5× 129 1.5k
Carlos A. Beltramino Argentina 15 386 0.7× 260 0.9× 138 0.5× 199 1.2× 164 1.1× 30 980
A.H. Mohammed Sweden 11 377 0.6× 207 0.7× 259 1.0× 120 0.7× 238 1.5× 15 1.1k
QiLiang Chen United States 13 205 0.3× 281 1.0× 121 0.5× 126 0.8× 241 1.5× 27 851
Nathalie Thiriet France 22 1.1k 1.9× 257 0.9× 256 1.0× 425 2.6× 347 2.2× 46 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mary E. Cain

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary E. Cain's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary E. Cain with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary E. Cain more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary E. Cain

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary E. Cain. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary E. Cain. The network helps show where Mary E. Cain may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary E. Cain

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary E. Cain. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary E. Cain based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary E. Cain. Mary E. Cain is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2024). Environmental enrichment and sex, but not n-acetylcysteine, alter extended-access amphetamine self-administration and cue-seeking. Behavioural Brain Research. 476. 115261–115261. 1 indexed citations
2.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2023). Super-resolution reconstruction in ultrahigh-field MRI. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(2). 100107–100107. 1 indexed citations
3.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2021). The effects of voluntary adolescent alcohol consumption on alcohol taste reactivity in Long Evans rats. Psychopharmacology. 238(6). 1713–1728. 3 indexed citations
4.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2021). Isolation housing elevates amphetamine seeking independent of nucleus accumbens glutamate receptor adaptations. European Journal of Neuroscience. 54(7). 6382–6396. 6 indexed citations
6.
Saucier, Donald A., et al.. (2017). Differential housing and novelty response: Protection and risk from locomotor sensitization. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 154. 20–30. 22 indexed citations
7.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2016). Voluntary ethanol consumption changes anticipatory ultrasonic vocalizations but not novelty response. Behavioural Brain Research. 320. 186–194. 4 indexed citations
8.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2015). Harmonic and frequency modulated ultrasonic vocalizations reveal differences in conditioned and unconditioned reward processing. Behavioural Brain Research. 287. 207–214. 12 indexed citations
9.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2015). Differential Rearing Alters Forced Swim Test Behavior, Fluoxetine Efficacy, and Post-Test Weight Gain in Male Rats. PLoS ONE. 10(7). e0131709–e0131709. 23 indexed citations
11.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2014). The effects of mGluR2/3 activation on acute and repeated amphetamine-induced locomotor activity in differentially reared male rats.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 22(3). 257–265. 13 indexed citations
12.
Kirkpatrick, Kimberly, et al.. (2013). Environmental rearing effects on impulsivity and reward sensitivity.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 127(5). 712–724. 33 indexed citations
13.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2012). Dose-dependent effects of differential rearing on amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. Behavioural Pharmacology. 23(8). 744–753. 15 indexed citations
14.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2009). The contribution of the central nucleus of the amygdala to individual differences in amphetamine-induced hyperactivity. Behavioural Brain Research. 202(1). 11–18. 6 indexed citations
15.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2009). Effects of mecamylamine on nicotine-induced conditioned hyperactivity and sensitization in differentially reared rats. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 93(1). 59–66. 21 indexed citations
16.
Deehan, Gerald A., Mary E. Cain, & Stephen W. Kiefer. (2007). Differential Rearing Conditions Alter Operant Responding for Ethanol in Outbred Rats. Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research. 31(10). 1692–1698. 60 indexed citations
17.
Cain, Mary E., et al.. (2006). Individual differences in the effect of novel environmental stimuli prior to amphetamine self-administration in rats (Rattus norvegicus).. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 14(3). 389–401. 14 indexed citations
18.
Cain, Mary E., Thomas A. Green, & Michael T. Bardo. (2006). Environmental enrichment decreases responding for visual novelty. Behavioural Processes. 73(3). 360–366. 57 indexed citations
19.
Bardo, Michael T., et al.. (2006). Effect of amphetamine on response inhibition in rats showing high or low response to novelty. Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior. 85(1). 98–104. 21 indexed citations
20.
Cain, Mary E., Donald A. Saucier, & Michael T. Bardo. (2005). Novelty seeking and drug use: Contribution of an animal model.. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology. 13(4). 367–375. 100 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026