Mary C. Webb

459 total citations
9 papers, 360 citations indexed

About

Mary C. Webb is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science and Cell Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mary C. Webb has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 360 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Plant Science and 3 papers in Cell Biology. Recurrent topics in Mary C. Webb's work include Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers). Mary C. Webb is often cited by papers focused on Plant Reproductive Biology (5 papers), Plant Molecular Biology Research (3 papers) and Microtubule and mitosis dynamics (3 papers). Mary C. Webb collaborates with scholars based in Australia. Mary C. Webb's co-authors include Brian E. S. Gunning, Elizabeth G. Williams, E. G. Williams, A. R. Hardham, Bruce A. Philip and M. Cope and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Annals of Botany and Planta.

In The Last Decade

Mary C. Webb

9 papers receiving 345 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mary C. Webb Australia	8	305	302	79	32	15	9	360
Glendon D. Ascough South Africa	10	146 0.5×	278 0.9×	57 0.7×	14 0.4×	16 1.1×	11	307
Bau‐Lian Huang Taiwan	11	298 1.0×	277 0.9×	83 1.1×	34 1.1×	5 0.3×	11	337
B. Q. Huang United States	10	396 1.3×	339 1.1×	141 1.8×	26 0.8×	7 0.5×	12	430
Emilio Maruyama Japan	11	306 1.0×	293 1.0×	52 0.7×	29 0.9×	7 0.5×	22	335
Yang Hong-yuan China	11	400 1.3×	339 1.1×	103 1.3×	17 0.5×	13 0.9×	62	439
Marjana Camloh Slovenia	11	130 0.4×	176 0.6×	113 1.4×	30 0.9×	6 0.4×	20	245
Juntaro Kato Japan	12	211 0.7×	256 0.8×	113 1.4×	45 1.4×	19 1.3×	27	342
Megumi Igarashi Japan	8	367 1.2×	469 1.6×	31 0.4×	29 0.9×	5 0.3×	13	511
M. Lecerf France	5	160 0.5×	267 0.9×	28 0.4×	8 0.3×	35 2.3×	6	285
K. O. Lapins Canada	10	171 0.6×	260 0.9×	31 0.4×	61 1.9×	8 0.5×	35	290

Countries citing papers authored by Mary C. Webb

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mary C. Webb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mary C. Webb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mary C. Webb more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mary C. Webb

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mary C. Webb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mary C. Webb. The network helps show where Mary C. Webb may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mary C. Webb

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mary C. Webb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mary C. Webb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mary C. Webb. Mary C. Webb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Cope, M., et al.. (1996). Immunocytochemical comparison of peripheral vesicles in zoospores of Phytophthora and Pythium species. Mycologia. 88(4). 523–532. 12 indexed citations

2.

Cope, M., et al.. (1996). Immunocytochemical Comparison of Peripheral Vesicles in Zoospores of Phytophthora and Pythium Species. Mycologia. 88(4). 523–523. 6 indexed citations

3.

Webb, Mary C. & Brian E. S. Gunning. (1994). Embryo sac development in Arabidopsis thaliana II. The cytoskeleton during megagametogenesis. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 7(3). 53 indexed citations

4.

Webb, Mary C. & Brian E. S. Gunning. (1991). The microtubular cytoskeleton during development of the zygote, proembryo and free-nuclear endosperm in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta. 184(2). 187–195. 19 indexed citations

5.

Webb, Mary C. & Brian E. S. Gunning. (1991). The microtubular cytoskeleton during development of the zygote, proembryo and free-nuclear endosperm inArabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. Planta. 184(2). 187–195. 89 indexed citations

6.

Webb, Mary C. & Brian E. S. Gunning. (1990). Embryo sac development in Arabidopsis thaliana. Sexual Plant Reproduction. 3(4). 141 indexed citations

7.

Webb, Mary C. & Elizabeth G. Williams. (1988). The Pollen Tube Pathway in the Pistil of Lycopersicon peruvianum. Annals of Botany. 61(4). 415–423. 21 indexed citations

8.

Webb, Mary C. & E. G. Williams. (1988). Effects of Temperature, Light, Nutrients and Carbon Dioxide on the Strength of the Self-Incompatibility Response in Detached Flowers of Lycopersicon peruvianum. Annals of Botany. 61(4). 395–404. 12 indexed citations

9.

Williams, Elizabeth G. & Mary C. Webb. (1987). Enclosure of Pollinated Flowers Weakens the Gametophytic Self-Incompatibility Response inLycopersicon peruvianum. Journal of Experimental Botany. 38(10). 1756–1764. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact