Marshall Watson

1.6k total citations · 2 hit papers
73 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Marshall Watson is a scholar working on Ocean Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Marshall Watson has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 46 papers in Ocean Engineering, 41 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 23 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Marshall Watson's work include Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (29 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (28 papers) and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (20 papers). Marshall Watson is often cited by papers focused on Hydraulic Fracturing and Reservoir Analysis (29 papers), Drilling and Well Engineering (28 papers) and Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods (20 papers). Marshall Watson collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Saudi Arabia. Marshall Watson's co-authors include Hossein Emadi, Athar Hussain, Sugan Raj Thiyagarajan, Talal Gamadi, T.W. Clyne, James J. Sheng, Habib Menouar, M. Y. Soliman, Oladoyin Kolawole and Xingbang Meng and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, Materials Science and Engineering A and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Marshall Watson

68 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

A comprehensive review of the mechanisms and efficiency o... 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 2022 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Marshall Watson United States 13 599 521 433 354 202 73 1.1k
Mingxing Bai China 17 439 0.7× 584 1.1× 323 0.7× 421 1.2× 150 0.7× 56 1.1k
Jifang Wan China 19 553 0.9× 158 0.3× 276 0.6× 209 0.6× 216 1.1× 52 1.2k
Hossein Emadi United States 19 596 1.0× 670 1.3× 521 1.2× 361 1.0× 247 1.2× 84 1.3k
Xingru Wu United States 18 691 1.2× 758 1.5× 388 0.9× 239 0.7× 84 0.4× 98 1.2k
Lingping Zeng Australia 24 543 0.9× 380 0.7× 481 1.1× 662 1.9× 515 2.5× 43 1.4k
Davood Zivar Iran 16 597 1.0× 533 1.0× 474 1.1× 693 2.0× 487 2.4× 37 1.5k
Viktor Reitenbach Germany 12 327 0.5× 188 0.4× 296 0.7× 527 1.5× 376 1.9× 23 861
Marcin Lutyński Poland 12 187 0.3× 226 0.4× 233 0.5× 97 0.3× 69 0.3× 54 562
Seyed Ali Ghoreishi‐Madiseh Canada 20 614 1.0× 224 0.4× 234 0.5× 220 0.6× 22 0.1× 66 1.2k
Ahmet Özarslan Türkiye 10 235 0.4× 185 0.4× 286 0.7× 159 0.4× 148 0.7× 15 758

Countries citing papers authored by Marshall Watson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marshall Watson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marshall Watson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marshall Watson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marshall Watson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marshall Watson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marshall Watson. The network helps show where Marshall Watson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marshall Watson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marshall Watson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marshall Watson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marshall Watson. Marshall Watson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2025). A Comparative Study of Major Risk Assessment (RA) Frameworks in Geologic Carbon Storage (GCS). Fuels. 6(2). 42–42. 4 indexed citations
3.
Thiyagarajan, Sugan Raj, et al.. (2025). Long-term effects of hydrogen and brine on the geomechanical properties of Berea sandstone– An experimental study. Gas Science and Engineering. 139. 205628–205628. 1 indexed citations
4.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2025). A Review of Key Challenges and Evaluation of Well Integrity in CO2 Storage: Insights from Texas Potential CCS Fields. Sustainability. 17(13). 5911–5911. 2 indexed citations
5.
Kolawole, Oladoyin, et al.. (2024). Optimizing CO2 storage in deep saline formations: a comprehensive review of enhancing pore space utilization through simultaneous or alternate aquifer injection. Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects. 46(1). 6513–6536. 4 indexed citations
7.
8.
Hussain, Athar, et al.. (2024). Non-Destructive Cyclic Analysis of Sealing Ability of Well Cement for Seasonal Underground Hydrogen Storage. Applied Sciences. 14(17). 7973–7973. 2 indexed citations
9.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2023). Produced Water Management and Utilization: Challenges and Future Directions. SPE Production & Operations. 38(3). 367–382. 8 indexed citations
10.
Emadi, Hossein, et al.. (2023). An investigation of fatigue response of well cement under cyclic loading and impact on zonal isolation performance. Geoenergy Science and Engineering. 230. 212172–212172. 2 indexed citations
11.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2023). Novel systematic approach for produced water volume quantification applicable for beneficial reuse. Environmental Science Advances. 2(3). 508–528. 6 indexed citations
12.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2022). Produced Water Treatment: Review of Technological Advancement in Hydrocarbon Recovery Processes, Well Stimulation, and Permanent Disposal Wells. SPE Production & Operations. 38(1). 51–62. 10 indexed citations
13.
Emadi, Hossein, et al.. (2022). A comprehensive literature review on the challenges associated with underground hydrogen storage. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 48(28). 10603–10635. 182 indexed citations breakdown →
14.
Emadi, Hossein, et al.. (2021). Artificial neural network (ANN) approach to predict unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of oil and gas well cement reinforced with nanoparticles. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 88. 103816–103816. 35 indexed citations
15.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2021). Twelve years of unconventional oil and gas development: production performance and economic analysis. International journal of energy and environmental engineering. 12(2). 151–174. 10 indexed citations
16.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2020). Comparative evaluation of multi-basin production performance and application of spatio-temporal models for unconventional oil and gas production prediction. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology. 10(8). 3091–3110. 6 indexed citations
17.
Kolawole, Oladoyin, et al.. (2020). How will treatment parameters impact the optimization of hydraulic fracturing process in unconventional reservoirs?. SN Applied Sciences. 2(11). 10 indexed citations
18.
Sheng, James J., Tim Cook, Fersheed Mody, et al.. (2015). Screening of the EOR Potential of a Wolfcamp Shale Oil Reservoir. 8 indexed citations
19.
Gamadi, Talal, et al.. (2014). An Experimental Study of Cyclic CO2 Injection to Improve Shale Oil Recovery. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium. 157 indexed citations
20.
Watson, Marshall, et al.. (2012). Assessment of Probabilistic Parameters for Barnett Shale Recoverable Volumes. SPE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Symposium. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026