Mark Wille

1.1k citations
19 papers · 791 indexed · h-index 13

Impact in

  • Urology top 2%
    • Urological Disorders and Treatments
  • Surgery top 5%
    • Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
    • Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies

Papers in

Mark Wille

18 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers

Mark Wille
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Urology 240
  • Surgery 663
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 59
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 212
  • Oncology 114
Replace Amit Gupta with:
Amit Gupta United States
Naima Smeulders United Kingdom
Alexander Tsivian Israel
Scott G. Hubosky United States
Fulvia Del Conte Italy
Mahesh C. Goel United States
Hagen Loertzer Germany
Roberto Vaz Juliano Brazil
Abhishek Pandey India
Mohamed Eltemamy United States
Mark Wille relative to Amit Gupta United States Amit Gupta's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Amit Gupta · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Wille

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Wille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Wille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Wille more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Wille

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Wille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Wille. The network helps show where Mark Wille may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Wille, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Wille Line = papers co-authored together Mark Wille links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#Work
1 2010183
2 2011174
3 201165
4 201164
5 201358
6
Continued improvement of perioperative, pathological and continence outcomes during 700 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies.
200951
7 200943
8 201136
9 201330
10 198618
11 200515
12 201013
13 201413
14 200912
15 201111
16 20103
17 20051
18 20181
19 20170

About Mark Wille

Mark Wille is a scholar working on Urology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Surgery, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 791 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments (8 papers), Urinary and Genital Oncology Studies (8 papers), Urological Disorders and Treatments (6 papers), Ureteral procedures and complications (3 papers), Diverticular Disease and Complications (3 papers), Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (3 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (2 papers) and Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (240 citations), Surgery (663 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (59 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (212 citations) and Oncology (114 citations). Mark Wille has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Scott E. Eggener, Stephen A. Boorjian, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Douglas S. Scherr, Jay D. Raman, John D. Terrell, Yair Lotan, Steven Lucas, Casey K. Ng and Robert G. Uzzo. Their work appears in journals such as Urology, Journal of Endourology, The Journal of Urology, British Journal of Urology and Urologic Oncology Seminars and Original Investigations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026