Mark Whittaker

2.5k total citations
86 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mark Whittaker is a scholar working on Mechanical Engineering, Mechanics of Materials and Materials Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Whittaker has authored 86 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 71 papers in Mechanical Engineering, 53 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 40 papers in Materials Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Mark Whittaker's work include High Temperature Alloys and Creep (56 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (49 papers) and Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties (16 papers). Mark Whittaker is often cited by papers focused on High Temperature Alloys and Creep (56 papers), Fatigue and fracture mechanics (49 papers) and Titanium Alloys Microstructure and Properties (16 papers). Mark Whittaker collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Sweden. Mark Whittaker's co-authors include M.R. Bache, B. Wilshire, W. J. Harrison, R.J. Lancaster, Dean Clark, Bryan Bennett, J. M. Roper, D. W. Cooke, Jonathan Jones and R. E. Muenchausen and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Physical review. B, Condensed matter and Journal of Applied Physics.

In The Last Decade

Mark Whittaker

85 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Whittaker United Kingdom 25 1.4k 891 750 280 212 86 2.0k
Joe Kelleher United Kingdom 27 1.4k 1.0× 871 1.0× 580 0.8× 288 1.0× 106 0.5× 95 1.9k
Robert C. Wimpory Germany 24 1.4k 1.0× 548 0.6× 511 0.7× 276 1.0× 112 0.5× 124 1.8k
P. Lukáš Czechia 34 2.8k 2.0× 2.2k 2.5× 2.1k 2.9× 327 1.2× 49 0.2× 175 4.0k
Jens Gibmeier Germany 21 1.6k 1.2× 580 0.7× 614 0.8× 96 0.3× 170 0.8× 146 2.1k
Darren C. Pagan United States 26 1.6k 1.1× 996 1.1× 539 0.7× 77 0.3× 187 0.9× 97 2.2k
Saurabh Kabra United Kingdom 27 2.0k 1.4× 1.0k 1.1× 429 0.6× 178 0.6× 139 0.7× 97 2.6k
Eckard Macherauch Germany 22 1.5k 1.1× 860 1.0× 972 1.3× 42 0.1× 33 0.2× 172 2.1k
Bassem S. El-Dasher United States 18 845 0.6× 982 1.1× 370 0.5× 27 0.1× 239 1.1× 41 1.6k
Peter Gregorčič Slovenia 29 979 0.7× 460 0.5× 771 1.0× 40 0.1× 30 0.1× 63 2.4k
Jarir Aktaa Germany 34 2.0k 1.4× 2.5k 2.8× 833 1.1× 62 0.2× 32 0.2× 192 3.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Whittaker

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Whittaker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Whittaker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Whittaker more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Whittaker

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Whittaker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Whittaker. The network helps show where Mark Whittaker may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Whittaker

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Whittaker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Whittaker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Whittaker. Mark Whittaker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Jonathan, et al.. (2025). The influence of phase angle on the TMF crack initiation behaviour and damage mechanisms of a single-crystal superalloy. International Journal of Fatigue. 196. 108887–108887. 1 indexed citations
2.
Moverare, Johan, R.J. Lancaster, Jonathan Jones, Svjetlana Stekovic, & Mark Whittaker. (2025). A Review of Recent Advances in the Understanding of Thermomechanical Fatigue Durability and Failure Mechanisms in Nickel-Based Superalloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 56(4). 1115–1134. 6 indexed citations
3.
Rouse, James, Mark Whittaker, Jonathan Jones, et al.. (2023). Modelling the influence of plasticity induced softening on the low cycle fatigue and crack propagation behaviour of a nickel-based superalloy. Computational Materials Science. 231. 112604–112604. 4 indexed citations
4.
5.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2022). Approaches to fatigue lifing in a high strength polycrystalline nickel alloy. International Journal of Fatigue. 166. 107239–107239. 1 indexed citations
6.
Li, Yong, et al.. (2022). High temperature corrosion-fatigue behavior of a shot peened nickel based superalloy. Corrosion Science. 207. 110577–110577. 12 indexed citations
7.
Rouse, James, Christopher Hyde, Daniel Leidermark, et al.. (2020). The prediction of crack propagation in coarse grain RR1000 using a unified modelling approach. International Journal of Fatigue. 137. 105652–105652. 14 indexed citations
8.
Stekovic, Svjetlana, Jonathan Jones, Mark Whittaker, et al.. (2020). DevTMF – Towards code of practice for thermo-mechanical fatigue crack growth. International Journal of Fatigue. 138. 105675–105675. 17 indexed citations
9.
Lin, B., Minsheng Huang, Liguo Zhao, et al.. (2018). 3D DDD modelling of dislocation–precipitate interaction in a nickel-based single crystal superalloy under cyclic deformation. The Philosophical Magazine A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics. 98(17). 1550–1575. 13 indexed citations
10.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2015). Development and Assessment of a New Empirical Model for Predicting Full Creep Curves. Materials. 8(7). 4582–4592. 10 indexed citations
11.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2015). The changing constants of creep: A letter on region splitting in creep lifing. Materials Science and Engineering A. 632. 96–102. 15 indexed citations
12.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2015). Environmental factors that affect the Fukuda stepping test in normal participants. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 129(5). 450–453. 13 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Jonathan, et al.. (2014). Non-invasive temperature measurement and control techniques under thermomechanical fatigue loading. Materials Science and Technology. 30(15). 1862–1876. 5 indexed citations
14.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2014). Assessing the Unterberger test: introduction of a novel smartphone application. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology. 128(11). 958–960. 7 indexed citations
15.
Whittaker, Mark, et al.. (2013). High temperature creep behaviour in the γ titanium aluminide Ti–45Al–2Mn–2Nb. Intermetallics. 38. 55–62. 22 indexed citations
16.
Whittaker, Mark. (2011). Considerations in fatigue lifing of stress concentrations in textured titanium 6-4. International Journal of Fatigue. 33(10). 1384–1391. 9 indexed citations
17.
Evans, M., et al.. (2011). Variability in the mechanical properties and processing conditions of a High Strength Low Alloy steel. Procedia Engineering. 10. 106–111. 11 indexed citations
18.
Wilshire, B. & Mark Whittaker. (2009). The role of grain boundaries in creep strain accumulation. Acta Materialia. 57(14). 4115–4124. 22 indexed citations
19.
Hurley, Peter, et al.. (2007). A methodology for predicting creep/fatigue crack growth rates in Ti 6246. International Journal of Fatigue. 29(9-11). 1702–1710. 8 indexed citations
20.
Cooke, D. W., Kenneth J. McClellan, Bryan Bennett, et al.. (2000). Crystal growth and optical characterization of cerium-doped Lu1.8Y0.2SiO5. Journal of Applied Physics. 88(12). 7360–7362. 203 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joe Kelleher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert C. Wimpory Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by P. Lukáš Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jens Gibmeier Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Darren C. Pagan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Saurabh Kabra Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eckard Macherauch Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bassem S. El-Dasher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Peter Gregorčič Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jarir Aktaa
Rankless by CCL
2026