Mark Whitbread
- Emergency Medicine top 1%
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation 17
- Trauma and Emergency Care Studies 6
-
- Acute Myocardial Infarction Research 11
- Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases 4
- Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments 4
- Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes 3
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
-
- Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices 8
-
- Traumatic Brain Injury Research 3
- Co-authors
- Rachael FothergillFionna MooreG VirdiMiles DalbyDouglas ChamberlainSimon RedwoodRoby RakhitAnthony Mathur
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Mark Whitbread
34 papers receiving 598 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
- Emergency Medicine 471
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 305
- Internal Medicine 25
- Emergency Medical Services 47
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 26
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Whitbread
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Whitbread's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Whitbread with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Whitbread more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Whitbread
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Whitbread. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Whitbread. The network helps show where Mark Whitbread may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Whitbread, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 22 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 10 | |
| 4 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 41 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 10 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 28 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 11 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 15 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 19 | |
| 16 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2013 | 27 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 19 | A 12-lead tale from three cities. Progress in the use of ECG & STEMI centers. | 2007 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 17 |
About Mark Whitbread
Mark Whitbread is a scholar working on Emergency Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Internal Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Emergency Medical Services, having authored 36 papers that have together received 617 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (17 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (11 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (8 papers), Trauma and Emergency Care Studies (6 papers), Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases (4 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (4 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (3 papers) and Traumatic Brain Injury Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Emergency Medicine (471 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (305 citations), Internal Medicine (25 citations), Emergency Medical Services (47 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (26 citations). Mark Whitbread has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Rachael Fothergill, Fionna Moore, G Virdi, Miles Dalby, Douglas Chamberlain, Simon Redwood, Roby Rakhit, Anthony Mathur, Philip MacCarthy and M. Bilal Iqbal. Their work appears in journals such as Resuscitation, BMJ Open, Heart, American Heart Journal and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.