Mark Webster

1.8k total citations · 1 hit paper
37 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Mark Webster is a scholar working on Paleontology, Geometry and Topology and Atmospheric Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Webster has authored 37 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Paleontology, 12 papers in Geometry and Topology and 9 papers in Atmospheric Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Webster's work include Evolution and Paleontology Studies (22 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (19 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (12 papers). Mark Webster is often cited by papers focused on Evolution and Paleontology Studies (22 papers), Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils (19 papers) and Morphological variations and asymmetry (12 papers). Mark Webster collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Mark Webster's co-authors include H. David Sheets, Miriam Leah Zelditch, Peter P. Marra, Nigel C. Hughes, Jason A. Dunlop, Melanie J. Hopkins, Alessandro Minelli, Giuseppe Fusco, Robert R. Gaines and Frederick A. Sundberg and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Nature Communications and The American Naturalist.

In The Last Decade

Mark Webster

35 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

A Practical Introduction to Landmark-Based Geometric Morp... 2010 2026 2015 2020 2010 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Webster United States 17 769 445 236 223 180 37 1.4k
Giuseppe Fusco Italy 20 589 0.8× 245 0.6× 299 1.3× 472 2.1× 96 0.5× 81 1.8k
Robert S. Sansom United Kingdom 22 1.0k 1.4× 136 0.3× 129 0.5× 92 0.4× 130 0.7× 49 1.3k
Jacques Michaux France 24 1.1k 1.4× 413 0.9× 693 2.9× 271 1.2× 240 1.3× 75 1.6k
Juan A. Pérez‐Claros Spain 19 960 1.2× 252 0.6× 563 2.4× 70 0.3× 188 1.0× 48 1.4k
Andossa Likius France 23 1.1k 1.5× 143 0.3× 452 1.9× 159 0.7× 308 1.7× 55 1.8k
Ursula B. Göhlich Austria 22 915 1.2× 79 0.2× 470 2.0× 148 0.7× 219 1.2× 65 1.4k
Mark A. Purnell United Kingdom 37 2.4k 3.1× 219 0.5× 407 1.7× 152 0.7× 298 1.7× 85 3.2k
Sophie Montuire France 24 863 1.1× 301 0.7× 577 2.4× 190 0.9× 337 1.9× 71 1.3k
Loïc Costeur Switzerland 21 917 1.2× 226 0.5× 462 2.0× 86 0.4× 118 0.7× 84 1.2k
А. С. Тесаков Russia 22 1.0k 1.3× 80 0.2× 666 2.8× 322 1.4× 466 2.6× 98 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Webster

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Webster more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Webster

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Webster. The network helps show where Mark Webster may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Webster

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Webster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Webster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Webster. Mark Webster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Webster, Mark & Jean‐Bernard Caron. (2024). Trilobites of the Cranbrook Lagerstätte (Eager Formation, Cambrian Stage 4), British Columbia. Journal of Paleontology. 98(4). 460–503.
2.
Landing, Ed, Mark Webster, & Samuel S. Bowser. (2023). Terminal Ediacaran–Late Ordovician evolution of the NE Laurentia palaeocontinent: rift–drift–onset of Taconic Orogeny, sea-level change and ‘Hawke Bay’ onlap (not offlap). Geological Society London Special Publications. 542(1). 179–215. 7 indexed citations
3.
Briggs, Derek E. G., et al.. (2023). Exceptional lower Cambrian fossils from a long‐lost locality in Vermont, USA. Geology Today. 39(4). 152–157.
4.
Webster, Mark, et al.. (2023). Ontogenetic mechanisms of size change: implications for the Lilliput effect and beyond. Paleobiology. 50(1). 130–149. 3 indexed citations
5.
Sundberg, Frederick A., Mark Webster, & Gerd Geyer. (2022). Biostratigraphical significance of a new trilobite fauna from the Harkless Formation (upper Stage 4, Series 2, Cambrian), Nevada, USA. Lethaia. 55(3). 1–12. 5 indexed citations
6.
Sundberg, Frederick A. & Mark Webster. (2022). “Ptychoparioid” trilobites of the Harkless Formation and Mule Spring Limestone (Cambrian Series 2, Stage 4), Clayton Ridge, Nevada. Journal of Paleontology. 96(4). 886–920. 8 indexed citations
7.
Webster, Mark. (2018). Morphological homeostasis in the fossil record. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology. 88. 91–104. 9 indexed citations
8.
Webster, Mark & Steven J. Hageman. (2018). Buenellus chilhoweensisn. sp. from the Murray Shale (lower Cambrian Chilhowee Group) of Tennessee, the oldest known trilobite from the Iapetan margin of Laurentia. Journal of Paleontology. 92(3). 442–458. 10 indexed citations
9.
Landing, Ed & Mark Webster. (2016). Geological context, biostratigraphy and systematic revision of late early Cambrian olenelloid trilobites from the Parker and Monkton formations, northwestern Vermont, U.S.A.. 193. 4 indexed citations
10.
Clarkson, Chris S., David Weetman, John Essandoh, et al.. (2014). Adaptive introgression between Anopheles sibling species eliminates a major genomic island but not reproductive isolation. Nature Communications. 5(1). 4248–4248. 122 indexed citations
12.
Webster, Mark & Miriam Leah Zelditch. (2011). Modularity of a Cambrian ptychoparioid trilobite cranidium. Evolution & Development. 13(1). 96–109. 32 indexed citations
13.
Webster, Mark. (2009). Systematic Revision of the Cambrian Trilobite 'Bathynotus' Hall, 1860, with Documentation of New Occurrences in Western Laurentia and Implications for Intercontinental Biostratigraphic Correlation. 369. 24 indexed citations
14.
Webster, Mark, Robert R. Gaines, & Nigel C. Hughes. (2008). Microstratigraphy, trilobite biostratinomy, and depositional environment of the “Lower Cambrian” Ruin Wash Lagerstätte, Pioche Formation, Nevada. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology. 264(1-2). 100–122. 51 indexed citations
15.
Webster, Mark. (2007). Paranephrolenellus, a New Genus of Early Cambrian Olenelloid Trilobite. 101. 12 indexed citations
16.
Webster, Mark. (2007). Ontogeny and evolution of the Early Cambrian trilobite genus Nephrolenellus (Olenelloidea). Journal of Paleontology. 81(6). 1168–1193. 48 indexed citations
17.
Webster, Mark & Miriam Leah Zelditch. (2005). Evolutionary modifications of ontogeny: heterochrony and beyond. Paleobiology. 31(3). 354–372. 107 indexed citations
18.
Fusco, Giuseppe, Nigel C. Hughes, Mark Webster, & Alessandro Minelli. (2004). Exploring Developmental Modes in a Fossil Arthropod: Growth and Trunk Segmentation of the TrilobiteAulacopleura konincki. The American Naturalist. 163(2). 167–183. 63 indexed citations
19.
Fawcett, Robert & Mark Webster. (1993). Quality-control techniques, software reduce variance.. Feedstuffs.. 65(1). 14–15. 1 indexed citations
20.
Gill, Peter, et al.. (1991). Databases, quality control and interpretation of DNA profiling in the Home Office Forensic Science Service. Electrophoresis. 12(2-3). 204–209. 29 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026