Mark Weber

5.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
40 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

Mark Weber is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Molecular Biology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Weber has authored 40 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 37 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 10 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Mark Weber's work include Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (36 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (15 papers). Mark Weber is often cited by papers focused on Solar and Space Plasma Dynamics (36 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (19 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (15 papers). Mark Weber collaborates with scholars based in United States, Japan and United Kingdom. Mark Weber's co-authors include L. Golub, E. E. DeLuca, Jonathan Cirtain, Taro Sakao, G. Del Zanna, B. O’Dwyer, Durgesh Tripathi, H. E. Mason, Noriyuki Narukage and Ryouhei Kano and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.

In The Last Decade

Mark Weber

37 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Initial Calibration of the Atmospheric Imaging Assembly (... 2011 2026 2016 2021 2011 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Weber United States 22 1.9k 364 224 70 62 40 2.0k
Amy R. Winebarger United States 24 1.9k 1.0× 426 1.2× 165 0.7× 54 0.8× 56 0.9× 94 2.0k
Paola Testa United States 25 1.8k 0.9× 220 0.6× 137 0.6× 57 0.8× 54 0.9× 77 1.9k
Jonathan Cirtain United States 22 1.8k 0.9× 385 1.1× 164 0.7× 36 0.5× 59 1.0× 52 1.8k
C. M. Korendyke United States 18 3.1k 1.6× 611 1.7× 283 1.3× 77 1.1× 43 0.7× 61 3.2k
L. K. Harra United Kingdom 31 3.5k 1.8× 637 1.8× 287 1.3× 138 2.0× 96 1.5× 197 3.6k
J. T. Schmelz United States 24 1.5k 0.8× 232 0.6× 114 0.5× 125 1.8× 67 1.1× 98 1.5k
F. Auchère France 20 1.3k 0.7× 216 0.6× 138 0.6× 90 1.3× 43 0.7× 130 1.4k
Hardi Peter Germany 28 2.8k 1.4× 506 1.4× 281 1.3× 46 0.7× 57 0.9× 139 2.9k
Katharine K. Reeves United States 27 2.2k 1.1× 418 1.1× 160 0.7× 40 0.6× 78 1.3× 99 2.2k
S. T. Lepri United States 26 1.8k 0.9× 366 1.0× 124 0.6× 48 0.7× 108 1.7× 96 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Weber

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Weber more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Weber

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Weber. The network helps show where Mark Weber may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Weber

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Weber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Weber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Weber. Mark Weber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Murphy, Nicholas A., et al.. (2024). XRTpy: A Hinode-X-Ray Telescope Python Package. The Journal of Open Source Software. 9(100). 6396–6396. 1 indexed citations
2.
Weber, Mark & Thomas E. Backer. (2024). Revisiting the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services COVID-19 Public Education Media Campaign: Successes and New Lessons Learned. Journal of Health Communication. 30(sup1). 70–75.
3.
Pérès, G., et al.. (2016).  X-RAYING THE DARK SIDE OF VENUS—SCATTER FROM VENUS’ MAGNETOTAIL?. The Astronomical Journal. 152(4). 107–107. 4 indexed citations
4.
Weber, Mark, et al.. (2015). Implementing Strategic Communications Planning in a Large Federal Agency. 20(3). 1. 6 indexed citations
5.
Tian, Hui, Lucia Kleint, Hardi Peter, et al.. (2014). OBSERVATIONS OF SUBARCSECOND BRIGHT DOTS IN THE TRANSITION REGION ABOVE SUNSPOTS WITH THE INTERFACE REGION IMAGING SPECTROGRAPH. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 790(2). L29–L29. 33 indexed citations
6.
Cirtain, Jonathan, L. Golub, Amy R. Winebarger, et al.. (2013). Energy release in the solar corona from spatially resolved magnetic braids. Nature. 493(7433). 501–503. 156 indexed citations
7.
O’Dwyer, B., G. Del Zanna, H. E. Mason, Mark Weber, & Durgesh Tripathi. (2010). SDO/AIA response to coronal hole, quiet Sun, active region, and flare plasma. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 521. A21–A21. 264 indexed citations
8.
Narukage, Noriyuki, Taro Sakao, Ryouhei Kano, et al.. (2010). Coronal-Temperature-Diagnostic Capability of the Hinode/X-Ray Telescope Based on Self-Consistent Calibration. Solar Physics. 269(1). 169–236. 45 indexed citations
9.
Schmelz, J. T., V. Kashyap, Steven H. Saar, et al.. (2009). SOME LIKE IT HOT: CORONAL HEATING OBSERVATIONS FROMHINODEX-RAY TELESCOPE ANDRHESSI. The Astrophysical Journal. 704(1). 863–869. 38 indexed citations
10.
Reeves, Katharine K., S. Parenti, F. Reale, & Mark Weber. (2007). Methods of Analyzing Temperatures in Post-Flare Loops using the XRT on Hinode. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2007. 1 indexed citations
11.
Reale, F., S. Parenti, Katharine K. Reeves, et al.. (2007). Magnetic activity and the solar corona: first results from the Hinode satellite .. Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.). 78. 591. 1 indexed citations
12.
Kano, R., Taro Sakao, Hirohisa Hara, et al.. (2007). The Hinode X-Ray Telescope (XRT): Camera Design, Performance and Operations. Solar Physics. 249(2). 263–279. 58 indexed citations
13.
Aulanier, G., L. Golub, E. E. DeLuca, et al.. (2007). Slipping Magnetic Reconnection in Coronal Loops. Science. 318(5856). 1588–1591. 71 indexed citations
14.
Shimizu, Toshifumi, Yukio Katsukawa, Keiichi Matsuzaki, et al.. (2007). Hinode Calibration for Precise Image Co-Alignment between SOT and XRT (2006 November–2007 April). Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan. 59(sp3). S845–S852. 45 indexed citations
15.
Cirtain, Jonathan, L. Golub, L. L. Lundquist, et al.. (2007). Evidence for Alfven Waves in Solar X-ray Jets. Science. 318(5856). 1580–1582. 291 indexed citations
16.
Frazin, R. A., Farzad Kamalabadi, & Mark Weber. (2005). On the Combination of Differential Emission Measure Analysis and Rotational Tomography for Three‐dimensional Solar EUV Imaging. The Astrophysical Journal. 628(2). 1070–1080. 25 indexed citations
17.
Weber, Mark, et al.. (2005). Isothermal Bias of the "Filter Ratio" Method for Observations of Multithermal Plasma. The Astrophysical Journal. 635(1). L101–L104. 33 indexed citations
18.
Weber, Mark, E. E. DeLuca, L. Golub, & A Sette. (2004). Temperature diagnostics with multichannel imaging telescopes. Proceedings of the International Astronomical Union. 2004(IAUS223). 321–328. 44 indexed citations
19.
Wolfson, Richard, et al.. (2000). Coronal X‐Ray Brightness and Photospheric Magnetic Field: A Study in Correlations. The Astrophysical Journal. 539(2). 995–1001. 16 indexed citations
20.
Weber, Mark, L. W. Acton, D. M. Alexander, S. Kubo, & Hirohisa Hara. (1999). A Method for Characterizing Rotation Rates in the Soft X-Ray Corona. Solar Physics. 189(2). 271–288. 27 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026