Mark W. Fear
Impact in
- Rehabilitation top 0.2%
- Wound Healing and Treatments
- Dermatology top 1%
- Dermatologic Treatments and Research
Papers in
- Epidemiology 63
- Burn Injury Management and Outcomes 62
-
- Wound Healing and Treatments 49
- Co-authors
- Fiona M. Wood (59 shared papers)Fiona Wood (54 shared papers)Andrew Stevenson (23 shared papers)Suzanne Rea (32 shared papers)Cecilia M. Prêle (8 shared papers)Janine M. Duke (20 shared papers)James Boyd (19 shared papers)Sean Randall (16 shared papers)
- Journals
- Burns (33 papers)Journal of Burn Care & Research (8 papers)Wound Repair and Regeneration (6 papers)Burns & Trauma (6 papers)Scientific Reports (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark W. Fear
120 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Mark W. Fear's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 150
- Rehabilitation 1.0k
- Dermatology 466
- Occupational Therapy 128
- Epidemiology 869
- Biomaterials 307
Countries citing papers authored by Mark W. Fear
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark W. Fear's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark W. Fear with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark W. Fear more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark W. Fear
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark W. Fear. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark W. Fear. The network helps show where Mark W. Fear may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark W. Fear, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 129 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Role of IL-6 in Skin Fibrosis and Cutaneous Wound Healing Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 325 |
| 2 | 2019 | 108 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 101 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 90 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 85 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 84 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 82 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 73 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 72 | |
| 10 | 2014 | 65 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 64 | |
| 12 | 2015 | 63 | |
| 13 | 2012 | 51 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 50 | |
| 15 | 2000 | 50 | |
| 16 | 2017 | 49 | |
| 17 | 2008 | 46 | |
| 18 | 2011 | 42 | |
| 19 | 2015 | 41 | |
| 20 | 2009 | 40 |
About Mark W. Fear
Mark W. Fear is a scholar working on Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Dermatology, having authored 129 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Burn Injury Management and Outcomes (62 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (49 papers), Injury Epidemiology and Prevention (22 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (21 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (8 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (7 papers), Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation (6 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (1.0k citations), Dermatology (466 citations), Occupational Therapy (128 citations), Epidemiology (869 citations) and Biomaterials (307 citations). Mark W. Fear has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Fiona M. Wood, Fiona Wood, Andrew Stevenson, Suzanne Rea, Cecilia M. Prêle, Janine M. Duke, James Boyd, Sean Randall, Natalie Giles and Hilary Wallace. Their work appears in journals such as Burns, Journal of Burn Care & Research, Wound Repair and Regeneration, Burns & Trauma and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.