Mark Stump

1.7k total citations
10 papers, 301 citations indexed

About

Mark Stump is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Genetics and Ecology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Stump has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 301 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in Genetics and 2 papers in Ecology. Recurrent topics in Mark Stump's work include RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers). Mark Stump is often cited by papers focused on RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (3 papers), Virus-based gene therapy research (2 papers) and Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (2 papers). Mark Stump collaborates with scholars based in United States. Mark Stump's co-authors include Dennis Maeder, James R. Brown, Frank T. Robb, Jocelyne DiRuggiero, Raymond Yeh, Robert B. Weiss, Karin D. Caldwell, Alexander Kamb, Michael Pierce and Deborah A. Steege and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Analytical Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mark Stump

10 papers receiving 293 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Stump United States 7 255 47 41 40 39 10 301
Mark A. Hayden United States 8 178 0.7× 29 0.6× 36 0.9× 75 1.9× 22 0.6× 10 300
Catherine C. Going United States 9 226 0.9× 31 0.7× 21 0.5× 17 0.4× 41 1.1× 10 341
Nilisha Pokhrel United States 11 345 1.4× 46 1.0× 70 1.7× 14 0.3× 28 0.7× 16 467
Norihito Muranaka Japan 12 366 1.4× 39 0.8× 70 1.7× 16 0.4× 13 0.3× 19 412
Yuying Gosser United States 7 444 1.7× 66 1.4× 15 0.4× 17 0.4× 24 0.6× 8 529
Qinglin Meng United States 8 376 1.5× 46 1.0× 38 0.9× 53 1.3× 46 1.2× 8 500
Peter D. Jeffrey Australia 12 228 0.9× 43 0.9× 27 0.7× 14 0.3× 28 0.7× 23 369
Fumiaki Tomoike Japan 11 319 1.3× 44 0.9× 23 0.6× 28 0.7× 8 0.2× 27 382
Andrei Sivolob Ukraine 16 645 2.5× 43 0.9× 50 1.2× 53 1.3× 22 0.6× 49 768
Michael R. White United States 9 390 1.5× 30 0.6× 15 0.4× 22 0.6× 20 0.5× 14 503

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Stump

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Stump's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Stump with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Stump more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Stump

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Stump. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Stump. The network helps show where Mark Stump may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Stump

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Stump. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Stump based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Stump. Mark Stump is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Schoumacher, Marie, Kristen E. Hurov, Joseph Lehár, et al.. (2014). Inhibiting Tankyrases Sensitizes KRAS-Mutant Cancer Cells to MEK Inhibitors via FGFR2 Feedback Signaling. Cancer Research. 74(12). 3294–3305. 28 indexed citations
2.
Pierce, Michael, Chunwei Wang, Mark Stump, & Alexander Kamb. (2003). Overexpression of the β‐catenin binding domain of cadherin selectively kills colorectal cancer cells. International Journal of Cancer. 107(2). 229–237. 13 indexed citations
3.
Pierce, Michael, et al.. (2003). A High-Throughput, Homogeneous Microplate Assay for Agents That Kill Mammalian Tissue Culture Cells. SLAS DISCOVERY. 8(3). 283–291. 7 indexed citations
4.
Yoo, Sanghee, Michael Pierce, Mark Stump, et al.. (2002). Genetic Selection for Modulators of the MAP Kinase and β-Catenin Growth-Control Pathways in Mammalian Cells. Biochemical Genetics. 40(11-12). 359–378. 3 indexed citations
5.
Stump, Mark, et al.. (2002). An Automated System for Screening Retroviral Expression Constructs in Microplate Format. SLAS DISCOVERY. 7(3). 275–280. 4 indexed citations
6.
Robb, Frank T., Dennis Maeder, James R. Brown, et al.. (2001). Genomic sequence of hyperthermophile, Pyrococcus furiosus: Implications for physiology and enzymology. Methods in enzymology on CD-ROM/Methods in enzymology. 330. 134–157. 170 indexed citations
7.
Sandrock, Tanya, Burt T. Richards, Mark A. Poritz, et al.. (2001). Exogenous Peptide and Protein Expression Levels Using Retroviral Vectors in Human Cells. Molecular Therapy. 4(5). 398–406. 7 indexed citations
8.
Stump, Mark, Susan Madison‐Antenucci, Robert J. Kokoska, & Deborah A. Steege. (1997). Filamentous phage IKe mRNAs conserve form and function despite divergence in regulatory elements 1 1 Edited by M. Gottesman. Journal of Molecular Biology. 266(1). 51–65. 3 indexed citations
9.
Stump, Mark, et al.. (1996). Binding of Biotinylated DNA to Streptavidin-Coated Polystyrene Latex: Effects of Chain Length and Particle Size. Analytical Biochemistry. 237(1). 115–122. 60 indexed citations
10.
Stump, Mark & Deborah A. Steege. (1996). Functional analysis of filamentous phage f1 mRNA processing sites.. PubMed. 2(12). 1286–94. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026