Mark Sperow

835 total citations
22 papers, 527 citations indexed

About

Mark Sperow is a scholar working on Soil Science, Ecology and Agronomy and Crop Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Sperow has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 527 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Soil Science, 8 papers in Ecology and 7 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Sperow's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (12 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (8 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). Mark Sperow is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (12 papers), Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology (8 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (5 papers). Mark Sperow collaborates with scholars based in United States and Australia. Mark Sperow's co-authors include Keith Paustian, Marlen Eve, R. F. Follett, C.K. Gehring, J.S. Moritz, Philip Turk, Gerard E. D’Souza, Sriroop Chaudhuri, Louis M. McDonald and Jeff Skousen and has published in prestigious journals such as Environmental Pollution, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment and Climatic Change.

In The Last Decade

Mark Sperow

21 papers receiving 482 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Sperow United States 13 253 129 101 94 93 22 527
R. Kroebel Canada 11 190 0.8× 189 1.5× 150 1.5× 80 0.9× 109 1.2× 25 542
Renato de Aragão Ribeiro Rodrigues Brazil 15 212 0.8× 187 1.4× 87 0.9× 108 1.1× 78 0.8× 53 602
Vincent Blanfort France 8 228 0.9× 269 2.1× 113 1.1× 133 1.4× 83 0.9× 28 563
André Mancebo Mazzetto New Zealand 12 123 0.5× 250 1.9× 94 0.9× 42 0.4× 116 1.2× 24 518
Caitlin A. Peterson United States 11 191 0.8× 232 1.8× 131 1.3× 101 1.1× 108 1.2× 18 633
Katrin Drastig Germany 13 308 1.2× 211 1.6× 64 0.6× 116 1.2× 109 1.2× 33 635
K. B. Kelly Australia 15 258 1.0× 176 1.4× 262 2.6× 146 1.6× 177 1.9× 41 714
I.E. Hoving Netherlands 10 115 0.5× 229 1.8× 66 0.7× 43 0.5× 81 0.9× 37 419
Simon Lehuger France 9 223 0.9× 170 1.3× 75 0.7× 137 1.5× 142 1.5× 12 575
Tas Thamo Australia 10 126 0.5× 133 1.0× 74 0.7× 70 0.7× 38 0.4× 11 368

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Sperow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Sperow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Sperow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Sperow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Sperow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Sperow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Sperow. The network helps show where Mark Sperow may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Sperow

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Sperow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Sperow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Sperow. Mark Sperow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Sperow, Mark. (2020). What might it cost to increase soil organic carbon using no-till on U.S. cropland?. Carbon Balance and Management. 15(1). 26–26. 14 indexed citations
2.
Sperow, Mark. (2020). Updated potential soil carbon sequestration rates on U.S. agricultural land based on the 2019 IPCC guidelines. Soil and Tillage Research. 204. 104719–104719. 25 indexed citations
3.
Sperow, Mark. (2018). Marginal cost to increase soil organic carbon using no-till on U.S. cropland. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change. 24(1). 93–112. 9 indexed citations
4.
Sperow, Mark. (2015). Estimating carbon sequestration potential on U.S. agricultural topsoils. Soil and Tillage Research. 155. 390–400. 29 indexed citations
5.
Sperow, Mark. (2014). An enhanced method for using the IPCC approach to estimate soil organic carbon storage potential on U.S. agricultural soils. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment. 193. 96–107. 9 indexed citations
6.
Jones, Carol, Cynthia J. Nickerson, & Mark Sperow. (2013). Greenhouse Gas Mitigation from the Conservation Reserve Program: The Contribution of Post-Contract Land Use Change. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.
7.
Chaudhuri, Sriroop, E. M. Pena‐Yewtukhiw, Louis M. McDonald, Jeff Skousen, & Mark Sperow. (2011). Land Use Effects on Sample Size Requirements for Soil Organic Carbon Stock Estimations. Soil Science. 176(2). 110–114. 12 indexed citations
8.
Gehring, C.K., et al.. (2011). Examining the relationships between pellet quality, broiler performance, and bird sex. The Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 20(2). 231–239. 65 indexed citations
9.
Wu, Jinzhuo, et al.. (2010). Economic Feasibility of a Woody Biomass- Based Ethanol Plant in Central Appalachia. Journal of agricultural and resource economics. 35(3). 522–544. 24 indexed citations
10.
Rosenberger, Randall S., Mark Sperow, & Donald B.K. English. (2008). Economies in Transition and Public Land-Use Policy: Discrete Duration Models of Eastern Wilderness Designation. Land Economics. 84(2). 267–281. 3 indexed citations
11.
Sperow, Mark, et al.. (2007). Stochastic Simulation of Pasture-Raised Beef Production Systems and Implications for the Appalachian Cow-Calf Sector. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture. 30(4). 27–51. 16 indexed citations
12.
Sperow, Mark. (2007). The marginal costs of carbon sequestration: Implications of one greenhouse gas mitigation activity. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 62(6). 367–375. 8 indexed citations
13.
Sperow, Mark. (2006). Carbon Sequestration Potential in Reclaimed Mine Sites in Seven East‐Central States. Journal of Environmental Quality. 35(4). 1428–1438. 40 indexed citations
14.
Brown, Cheryl, et al.. (2005). Examining the Cost of an All-Organic Diet. Journal of food distribution research. 36(1). 20–26. 16 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Carol, Robert M. House, Mark Peters, Mark Sperow, & Marlen Eve. (2004). Economics of Sequestering Carbon in the U.S. Agricultural Sector. By Jan. Technical Bulletins. 2 indexed citations
16.
Sperow, Mark, Marlen Eve, & Keith Paustian. (2003). Potential Soil C Sequestration on U.S. Agricultural Soils. Climatic Change. 57(3). 319–339. 105 indexed citations
17.
Eve, Marlen, Mark Sperow, Keith Paustian, & R. F. Follett. (2002). National-scale estimation of changes in soil carbon stocks on agricultural lands. Environmental Pollution. 116(3). 431–438. 56 indexed citations
18.
Eve, Marlen, et al.. (2002). Predicted impact of management changes on soil carbon storage for each cropland region of the conterminous United States. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 57(4). 196–204. 50 indexed citations
19.
Sperow, Mark. (2000). Three essays addressing production economics and irrigation : managing for drought and pests transported in irrigation water. 5 indexed citations
20.
Sperow, Mark & Donald W. Lybecker. (1998). Modeling the alfalfa stem nematode in irrigated alfalfa. Agricultural Systems. 58(4). 555–570. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026