Mark Seymour

640 total citations
25 papers, 525 citations indexed

About

Mark Seymour is a scholar working on Plant Science, Agronomy and Crop Science and Soil Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Seymour has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 525 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Plant Science, 14 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 8 papers in Soil Science. Recurrent topics in Mark Seymour's work include Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (9 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers). Mark Seymour is often cited by papers focused on Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology (9 papers), Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (7 papers) and Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (7 papers). Mark Seymour collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Ireland and United States. Mark Seymour's co-authors include R. J. French, John A. Kirkegaard, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, P.F. White, Mark B. Peoples, G H Walton, W. K. Anderson, R. S. Malik, RJ French and Lindsay W. Bell and has published in prestigious journals such as Field Crops Research, Journal of Plant Nutrition and Crop and Pasture Science.

In The Last Decade

Mark Seymour

24 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers

Mark Seymour

ACS

EEBS

R. J. French Australia

Brigitte Dorn Switzerland

S. C. Rao United States

Erin R. Haramoto United States

Kevin J. Betts United States

P.A. Hollington United Kingdom

Emine BUDAKLI ÇARPICI Türkiye

Jürg Hiltbrunner Switzerland

Bill Biligetu Canada

Bai Changjun China

R. J. French Australia

Mark Seymour

630 ×1.7

309 ×1.2

ACS

115 ×0.8

154 ×1.4

EEBS

70 ×0.8

Citations per year, relative to Mark Seymour Mark Seymour (= 1×) peers R. J. French

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Seymour

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Seymour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Seymour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Seymour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Seymour

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Seymour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Seymour. The network helps show where Mark Seymour may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Seymour

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Seymour. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Seymour based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Seymour. Mark Seymour is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

McCormick, Jeffrey, et al.. (2021). Dual-purpose crops: the potential to increase cattle liveweight gains in winter across southern Australia. Animal Production Science. 61(11). 1189–1201. 4 indexed citations

Seymour, Mark, et al.. (2020). Chemical weed control in canola.

Sprague, S. J., et al.. (2018). Dual-purpose cereals offer increased productivity across diverse regions of Australia’s high rainfall zone. Field Crops Research. 227. 119–131. 13 indexed citations

Seymour, Mark & Ross Brennan. (2017). Cultivars of canola respond similarly to applied nitrogen in n-deficient soils of south Western Australia. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 40(18). 2631–2649. 3 indexed citations

French, R. J., Mark Seymour, & R. S. Malik. (2016). Plant density response and optimum crop densities for canola (Brassica napus L.) in Western Australia. Crop and Pasture Science. 67(4). 397–408. 21 indexed citations

Seymour, Mark, et al.. (2016). Nitrogen responses of canola in low to medium rainfall environments of Western Australia. Crop and Pasture Science. 67(4). 450–466. 9 indexed citations

Zhang, Heping, et al.. (2016). Relative yield and profit of Australian hybrid compared with open-pollinated canola is largely determined by growing-season rainfall. Crop and Pasture Science. 67(4). 323–331. 27 indexed citations

Seymour, Mark, et al.. (2015). Effect of timing and height of defoliation on the grain yield of barley, wheat, oats and canola in Western Australia. Crop and Pasture Science. 66(4). 287–300. 12 indexed citations

Sprague, S. J., et al.. (2015). Forage and grain yield of diverse canola (Brassica napus) maturity types in the high-rainfall zone of Australia. Crop and Pasture Science. 66(4). 260–274. 24 indexed citations

10.

Salam, Moin U., William J. MacLeod, Mark Seymour, et al.. (2011). G2 Blackspot Manager model to guide field pea sowing for southern Australia in relation to ascochyta blight disease. Australasian Plant Pathology. 40(6). 632–639. 11 indexed citations

11.

Salam, Moin U., et al.. (2011). A meta-analysis of severity and yield loss from ascochyta blight on field pea in Western Australia. Australasian Plant Pathology. 40(6). 591–600. 15 indexed citations

12.

Salam, Moin U., William J. MacLeod, J.A. Davidson, et al.. (2011). G1 Blackspot Manager model predicts the maturity and release of ascospores in relation to ascochyta blight on field pea. Australasian Plant Pathology. 40(6). 621–631. 19 indexed citations

13.

Regan, Kerry, et al.. (2006). Response of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) varieties to time of sowing in Mediterranean-type environments of south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 46(3). 395–395. 9 indexed citations

14.

White, Peter, et al.. (2005). Producing pulses in the northern agricultural region. 5 indexed citations

15.

Seymour, Mark, Kadambot H. M. Siddique, Nicholas J. Brandon, L. D. Martin, & Elizabeth Jackson. (2002). Response of vetch ( Vicia spp.) to plant density in south-western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 42(8). 1043–1051. 19 indexed citations

16.

Mackintosh, N. J., Mark Seymour, Kevin Kenny, et al.. (2000). Supplementation of Cattle Browsing Tagasaste (Chamaecytisus proliferus) During Autumn Improves Liveweight Gain. Murdoch Research Repository (Murdoch University). 2 indexed citations

17.

Seymour, Mark. (1996). Response of narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.) to foliar application of growth regulators in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 36(4). 473–473. 7 indexed citations

18.

Siddique, Kadambot H. M., G H Walton, & Mark Seymour. (1993). A comparison of seed yields of winter grain legumes in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 33(7). 915–915. 81 indexed citations

19.

Anderson, W. K., RJ French, & Mark Seymour. (1992). Yield responses of wheat and other crops to agronomic practices on duplex soils compared with other soils in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 32(7). 963–963. 25 indexed citations

20.

Anderson, W. K., et al.. (1991). Evidence for differences between cultivars in responsiveness of wheat to applied nitrogen. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research. 42(3). 363–377. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact