Mark Schubert

2.2k total citations
71 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

Mark Schubert is a scholar working on Plant Science, Building and Construction and Biomaterials. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Schubert has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Plant Science, 17 papers in Building and Construction and 15 papers in Biomaterials. Recurrent topics in Mark Schubert's work include Wood Treatment and Properties (15 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (11 papers) and Wood and Agarwood Research (11 papers). Mark Schubert is often cited by papers focused on Wood Treatment and Properties (15 papers), Enzyme-mediated dye degradation (11 papers) and Wood and Agarwood Research (11 papers). Mark Schubert collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Mark Schubert's co-authors include Francis W. M. R. Schwarze, Michael J. Wiggins, Anne Hiltner, James M. Anderson, Siegfried Fink, Terry O. Collier, Anshu B. Mathur, Weiyuan John Kao, Ingo Burgert and Stefan Salentinig and has published in prestigious journals such as Chemical Reviews, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mark Schubert

70 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Schubert Switzerland 25 572 476 400 346 273 71 1.8k
Carla Silva Portugal 27 631 1.1× 659 1.4× 301 0.8× 191 0.6× 146 0.5× 81 2.0k
Helan Xu United States 29 1.3k 2.3× 466 1.0× 186 0.5× 404 1.2× 113 0.4× 74 2.4k
Jinwu Wang United States 28 1.4k 2.5× 782 1.6× 267 0.7× 456 1.3× 107 0.4× 83 2.7k
F. Carrillo Spain 22 1.2k 2.0× 1.0k 2.2× 255 0.6× 882 2.5× 151 0.6× 67 2.9k
Emanuel M. Fernandes Portugal 21 705 1.2× 515 1.1× 507 1.3× 594 1.7× 66 0.2× 54 2.0k
C. Valencia Spain 37 887 1.6× 1.3k 2.8× 322 0.8× 728 2.1× 275 1.0× 141 4.2k
Lubomir Lapčí­k Czechia 21 400 0.7× 464 1.0× 117 0.3× 370 1.1× 222 0.8× 106 2.3k
Naotsugu Nagasawa Japan 28 1.6k 2.7× 657 1.4× 509 1.3× 597 1.7× 215 0.8× 91 3.2k
Ki Hoon Lee South Korea 35 2.1k 3.7× 882 1.9× 101 0.3× 239 0.7× 191 0.7× 112 3.6k
Anuj Kumar Czechia 31 961 1.7× 1.2k 2.6× 397 1.0× 809 2.3× 127 0.5× 82 2.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Schubert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Schubert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Schubert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Schubert. The network helps show where Mark Schubert may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Schubert

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Schubert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Schubert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Schubert. Mark Schubert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mayer, Sven, et al.. (2025). An explainable segmentation decision tree model for enhanced decision support in roundwood sorting. Knowledge-Based Systems. 324. 113814–113814. 1 indexed citations
2.
Burgert, Ingo, et al.. (2024). Chemical and Physical Debonding-on-Demand of Poly(urethane urea) Thermoset Adhesives to Facilitate the Recycling of Engineered Wooden Products. ACS Applied Polymer Materials. 6(10). 5778–5787. 5 indexed citations
3.
Burgert, Ingo, et al.. (2024). Split wooden rods for novel wood-based boards in the construction sector. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 9. 30–35. 1 indexed citations
4.
Kelch, Steffen, Urs Burckhardt, Philippe Grönquist, et al.. (2024). Bonding of beech wood to mortar with a novel epoxy hybrid-adhesive: Performance in dry and wet conditions. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 136. 103868–103868.
5.
Schubert, Mark, Guido Panzarasa, & Ingo Burgert. (2022). Sustainability in Wood Products: A New Perspective for Handling Natural Diversity. Chemical Reviews. 123(5). 1889–1924. 66 indexed citations
6.
Palma, Pedro, et al.. (2021). Predicting the strength of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) boards using image-based local fibre direction data. Wood Science and Technology. 56(1). 123–146. 13 indexed citations
7.
Schubert, Mark, et al.. (2020). Enzyme immobilization inside the porous wood structure: a natural scaffold for continuous-flow biocatalysis. RSC Advances. 10(35). 20608–20619. 35 indexed citations
8.
Schubert, Mark, et al.. (2020). Wood–Gelatin Bio-Composite Membranes with Tunable Flux. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering. 8(18). 7205–7213. 20 indexed citations
9.
Bösiger, Peter, et al.. (2018). Application of response surface methodology to tailor the surface chemistry of electrospun chitosan-poly(ethylene oxide) fibers. Carbohydrate Polymers. 186. 122–131. 29 indexed citations
10.
Ribera, Javier, Alvin M. C. Tang, Mark Schubert, et al.. (2016). In-Vitro Evaluation of Antagonistic Trichoderma Strains for Eradicating Phellinus Noxius In Colonised Wood. 28(4). 457–468. 4 indexed citations
11.
Schubert, Mark, et al.. (2015). Micronized Copper Wood Preservatives: Efficacy of Ion, Nano, and Bulk Copper against the Brown Rot Fungus Rhodonia placenta. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0142578–e0142578. 44 indexed citations
13.
Ihssen, Julian, Mark Schubert, Linda Thöny‐Meyer, & Michael Richter. (2014). Laccase Catalyzed Synthesis of Iodinated Phenolic Compounds with Antifungal Activity. PLoS ONE. 9(3). e89924–e89924. 48 indexed citations
14.
Georgi, Richard von, et al.. (2012). The red poplar leaf beetle in short rotation coppice.. 67(12). 11–13. 1 indexed citations
15.
Schubert, Mark, et al.. (2011). Modelling the hyphal growth of the wood-decay fungus Physisporinus vitreus. Fungal Biology. 115(9). 919–932. 33 indexed citations
16.
Schubert, Mark & Francis W. M. R. Schwarze. (2010). Evaluation of the interspecific competitive ability of the bioincising fungus Physisporinus vitreus. Journal of Basic Microbiology. 51(1). 80–88. 8 indexed citations
17.
Lehringer, Christian, et al.. (2009). Bioincised wood as substrate for surface modifications. DORA Empa (Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (Empa)). 5 indexed citations
18.
Schubert, Mark, Michael J. Wiggins, James M. Anderson, & Anne Hiltner. (1997). Role of oxygen in biodegradation of poly(etherurethane urea) elastomers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 34(4). 519–530. 94 indexed citations
19.
Schubert, Mark, Michael J. Wiggins, James M. Anderson, & Anne Hiltner. (1997). Comparison of two antioxidants for poly(etherurethane urea) in an acceleratedin vitro biodegradation system. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 34(4). 493–505. 32 indexed citations
20.
Ziats, Nicholas P., et al.. (1993). Protein adsorption and endothelial cell attachment and proliferation on PAPI‐based additive modified poly(ether urethane ureas). Journal of Biomedical Materials Research. 27(4). 499–510. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026