Mark S. Patterson

1.7k total citations
45 papers, 799 citations indexed

About

Mark S. Patterson is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark S. Patterson has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 799 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 43 papers in Surgery, 27 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 22 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in Mark S. Patterson's work include Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (37 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (17 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers). Mark S. Patterson is often cited by papers focused on Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (37 papers), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (17 papers) and Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics (16 papers). Mark S. Patterson collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Bulgaria. Mark S. Patterson's co-authors include Ton Slagboom, Maarten A. Vink, Ferdinand Kiemeneij, Giovanni Amoroso, Patrick W. Serruys, Maurits T. Dirksen, René J. van der Schaaf, Nicola S. Vos, Steve Ramcharitar and Jean‐Paul R. Herrman and has published in prestigious journals such as European Heart Journal, The American Journal of Cardiology and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

Mark S. Patterson

43 papers receiving 776 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark S. Patterson Netherlands	15	633	495	339	196	84	45	799
Luigi Fiocca Italy	13	469 0.7×	338 0.7×	158 0.5×	263 1.3×	81 1.0×	30	594
P.‐A. Dorsaz Switzerland	14	309 0.5×	319 0.6×	157 0.5×	204 1.0×	78 0.9×	35	613
Patrick W. Serruys Netherlands	17	941 1.5×	628 1.3×	616 1.8×	281 1.4×	75 0.9×	28	1.1k
Simon Eccleshall United Kingdom	14	623 1.0×	530 1.1×	265 0.8×	282 1.4×	19 0.2×	53	810
Klaus Hertting Germany	8	150 0.2×	334 0.7×	134 0.4×	59 0.3×	62 0.7×	23	482
Shutaro Satake Japan	12	322 0.5×	480 1.0×	80 0.2×	268 1.4×	44 0.5×	39	719
Marco Vaghetti Italy	12	641 1.0×	397 0.8×	360 1.1×	313 1.6×	20 0.2×	23	768
Stephen R. Ramee United States	12	621 1.0×	301 0.6×	98 0.3×	157 0.8×	147 1.8×	20	703
Brian Bigelow United States	6	372 0.6×	304 0.6×	116 0.3×	116 0.6×	39 0.5×	11	451
Anh B. Bui United States	13	931 1.5×	620 1.3×	683 2.0×	353 1.8×	81 1.0×	24	1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark S. Patterson

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark S. Patterson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark S. Patterson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark S. Patterson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark S. Patterson

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark S. Patterson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark S. Patterson. The network helps show where Mark S. Patterson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark S. Patterson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark S. Patterson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark S. Patterson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark S. Patterson. Mark S. Patterson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Vos, Nicola S., René J. van der Schaaf, Giovanni Amoroso, et al.. (2023). EXpansion of stents after intravascular lithoTripsy versus conventional predilatation in CALCified coronary arteries. International Journal of Cardiology. 386. 24–29. 4 indexed citations

Latib, Azeem, Pierfrancesco Agostoni, Jo Dens, et al.. (2021). Paclitaxel Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of De Novo Small-Vessel and Restenotic Coronary Artery Lesions: 12-Month Results of the Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm PREVAIL Study. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 33(11). E863–E869. 6 indexed citations

Vos, Nicola S., René van der Schaaf, Giovanni Amoroso, et al.. (2021). Two-Year Clinical Outcomes of the REVELATION Study: Sustained Safety and Feasibility of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction. The Journal of invasive cardiology. 34(1). E39–E42. 19 indexed citations

Fagel, Nick D., Giovanni Amoroso, Maarten A. Vink, et al.. (2021). An immediate or early invasive strategy in non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome: The OPTIMA-2 randomized controlled trial. American Heart Journal. 234. 42–50. 10 indexed citations

Vos, Nicola S., Nick D. Fagel, Giovanni Amoroso, et al.. (2019). Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Angioplasty Versus Drug-Eluting Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 12(17). 1691–1699. 139 indexed citations

Fagel, Nick D., Moniek Maarse, Ton Slagboom, et al.. (2019). Five-year results of the complete versus culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in multivessel disease using drug-eluting stents II (CORRECT II) study: a prospective, randomised controlled trial. Netherlands Heart Journal. 27(6). 310–320. 8 indexed citations

Vos, Nicola S., Maurits T. Dirksen, Maarten A. Vink, et al.. (2014). Safety and feasibility of a PAclitaxel-eluting balloon angioplasty in Primary Percutaneous coronary intervention in Amsterdam (PAPPA): one-year clinical outcome of a pilot study. EuroIntervention. 10(5). 584–590. 42 indexed citations

Vink, Maarten A., Mark S. Patterson, Alexander Ijsselmuiden, et al.. (2011). A randomized comparison of manual versus mechanical thrombus removal in primary percutaneous coronary intervention in the treatment of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (TREAT‐MI). Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 78(1). 14–19. 17 indexed citations

Vink, Maarten A., Giovanni Amoroso, Maurits T. Dirksen, et al.. (2011). Routine use of the transradial approach in primary percutaneous coronary intervention: procedural aspects and outcomes in 2209 patients treated in a single high-volume centre. Heart. 97(23). 1938–1942. 41 indexed citations

10.

Patterson, Mark S., Maurits T. Dirksen, Alexander Ijsselmuiden, et al.. (2010). Primary percutaneous coronary intervention by magnetic navigation compared with conventional wire technique. European Heart Journal. 32(12). 1472–1478. 8 indexed citations

11.

Patterson, Mark S.. (2010). 3D reconstruction from contrast coronary angiography in magnetic percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 76(4). 532–535. 1 indexed citations

12.

Patterson, Mark S., et al.. (2009). Magnetic wire lock: Prevention and correction to avoid wire fracture. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 74(4). 569–574. 3 indexed citations

13.

Ijsselmuiden, Alexander, Mark S. Patterson, Geert-Jan Tangelder, et al.. (2009). Magnetically navigated percutaneous coronary intervention in distal and/or complex lesions may improve procedural outcome and material consumption. EuroIntervention. 4(4). 517–523. 14 indexed citations

14.

Kiemeneij, Ferdinand, Mark S. Patterson, Giovanni Amoroso, GertJan Laarman, & Ton Slagboom. (2008). Use of the Stereotaxis Niobe® magnetic navigation system for percutaneous coronary intervention: Results from 350 consecutive patients. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 71(4). 510–516. 56 indexed citations

15.

Ramcharitar, Steve, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, Mark S. Patterson, et al.. (2008). A randomized comparison of the magnetic navigation system versus conventional percutaneous coronary intervention. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 72(6). 761–770. 12 indexed citations

16.

Dirksen, Maurits T., Maarten A. Vink, Maarten J. Suttorp, et al.. (2008). Two year follow-up after primary PCI with a paclitaxel-eluting stent versus a bare-metal stent for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (the PASSION trial): a follow-up study. EuroIntervention. 4(1). 64–70. 38 indexed citations

17.

Riezebos, Robert K., et al.. (2007). A bridge to Brugada. EP Europace. 9(6). 398–400. 1 indexed citations

18.

Ramcharitar, Steve, et al.. (2007). First direct in vivo comparison of two commercially available three‐dimensional quantitative coronary angiography systems. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 71(1). 44–50. 36 indexed citations

19.

Ramcharitar, Steve, Mark S. Patterson, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, et al.. (2007). A randomised controlled study comparing conventional and magnetic guidewires in a two‐dimensional branching tortuous phantom simulating angulated coronary vessels. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 70(5). 662–668. 12 indexed citations

20.

Ramcharitar, Steve, Mark S. Patterson, Robert‐Jan van Geuns, & Patrick W. Serruys. (2006). Magnetic navigation system used successfully to cross a crushed stent in a bifurcation that failed with conventional wires. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 69(6). 852–855. 15 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact