Mark Oxborrow

1.5k citations
44 papers · 1.0k indexed · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Mark Oxborrow

42 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Mark Oxborrow
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 574
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 180
  • Archeology 15
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 10
  • Biophysics 62
Replace Laurent Helden with:
Laurent Helden Germany
A. Widom United States
T. R. Gosnell United States
M. Grover United States
Immanuil L. Fabelinskii Russia
N. S. Shiren United States
V. I. Balykin Russia
Marcelo F. Ciappina Spain
M. Ebrahim-Zadeh Spain
Claudia Eberlein United Kingdom
Mark Oxborrow relative to Laurent Helden Germany Laurent Helden's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Laurent Helden · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Oxborrow

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Oxborrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Oxborrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Oxborrow more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Oxborrow

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Oxborrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Oxborrow. The network helps show where Mark Oxborrow may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Oxborrow, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Oxborrow Line = papers co-authored together Mark Oxborrow links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 44 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1993136
2 2012107
3 200894
4 199584
5 199679
6 200563
7 200462
8 201545
9 199641
10 201733
11 201627
12 199922
13 201720
14 201920
15 201119
16 200718
17 202216
18 201015
19 202115
20 202314

About Mark Oxborrow

Mark Oxborrow is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry, Biophysics and Spectroscopy, having authored 44 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (9 papers), Mechanical and Optical Resonators (9 papers), Quantum optics and atomic interactions (7 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (6 papers), Quasicrystal Structures and Properties (5 papers), Advanced Fiber Laser Technologies (5 papers), Advanced Frequency and Time Standards (5 papers) and Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (574 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (180 citations), Archeology (15 citations), Acoustics and Ultrasonics (10 citations) and Biophysics (62 citations). Mark Oxborrow has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Christopher L. Henley, Jonathan Breeze, Neil McN. Alford, S. A. Webster, P. Gill, Thomas Guhr, C. Ellegaard, Alastair G. Sinclair, Jesper Nygård and Juna Sathian. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Optics Express, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, Applied Physics Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact