This map shows the geographic impact of Mark McKenna's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark McKenna with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark McKenna more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark McKenna. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark McKenna. The network helps show where Mark McKenna may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark McKenna
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark McKenna.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark McKenna based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark McKenna. Mark McKenna is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McKenna, Mark, et al.. (2023). Investigating Design. University of Pittsburgh Law Review. 84(1).2 indexed citations
4.
McKenna, Mark. (2019). Comparative Analysis of Innovation Failures and Institutions in Context. eYLS (Yale Law School). 57(2). 313–348.1 indexed citations
5.
McKenna, Mark. (2018). Moment of truth: History and Australia's future. 1.10 indexed citations
6.
McKenna, Mark & Christopher Jon Sprigman. (2017). What's in, and What's Out: How IP's Boundary Rules Shape Innovation. eYLS (Yale Law School). 30(2). 491.1 indexed citations
7.
McKenna, Mark. (2013). After manning Clark: A biographer's postscript. Meanjin. 72(2). 84.1 indexed citations
8.
McKenna, Mark. (2013). Fixing Copyright in Three Impossible Steps: Review of How to Fix Copyright by William Patry. eYLS (Yale Law School).
9.
McGeveran, William & Mark McKenna. (2013). Confusion Isn't Everything. SSRN Electronic Journal. 89(1). 253–318.1 indexed citations
10.
McKenna, Mark. (2011). Creativity and the Law. The Notre Dame law review. 86(5). 1819.1 indexed citations
11.
McKenna, Mark. (2011). Probabilistic Knowledge of Third-Party Trademark Infringement. eYLS (Yale Law School).1 indexed citations
12.
Lemley, Mark A. & Mark McKenna. (2010). Owning Mark(et)s. Michigan Law Review. 109(2). 137–189.7 indexed citations
13.
McKenna, Mark. (2009). Trademark Use and the Problem of Source. eYLS (Yale Law School).2 indexed citations
14.
McKenna, Mark. (2009). Testing Modern Trademark Law's Theory of Harm. eYLS (Yale Law School).7 indexed citations
15.
McKenna, Mark. (2008). Imagination and History. Teaching history. 42(1). 7.1 indexed citations
16.
McKenna, Mark. (2007). The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law. The Notre Dame law review. 82(5). 1839.7 indexed citations
17.
McKenna, Mark & Wayne Hudson. (2003). Australian republicanism : a reader. ANU Open Research (Australian National University).5 indexed citations
18.
McKenna, Mark, et al.. (2001). With Hope in God, the Prime Minister and the Poet: Lessons from the 1999 Referendum on the Preamble. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 24(2). 401.2 indexed citations
19.
McKenna, Mark, et al.. (2001). First Words: The Preamble to the Australian Constitution. ANU Open Research (Australian National University). 24(2). 382.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.