Mark M. Garner

3.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 3.4k citations indexed

About

Mark M. Garner is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Biomedical Engineering and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark M. Garner has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 3.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Molecular Biology, 16 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 10 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in Mark M. Garner's work include Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (15 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (12 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers). Mark M. Garner is often cited by papers focused on Microfluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications (15 papers), DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry (12 papers) and Organometallic Complex Synthesis and Catalysis (8 papers). Mark M. Garner collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Mark M. Garner's co-authors include Arnold Revzin, J. Reglinski, Mark D. Spicer, Alan R. Kennedy, MB Burg, Gary Felsenfeld, D C Rau, Andreas Chrambach, P.A. Slavin and David R. Armstrong and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of the American Chemical Society and Nucleic Acids Research.

In The Last Decade

Mark M. Garner

44 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

A gel electrophoresis method for quantifying the binding ... 1981 2026 1996 2011 1981 500 1000 1.5k

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark M. Garner United States 25 2.1k 710 560 438 320 45 3.4k
David J. McConnell Ireland 29 2.1k 1.0× 678 1.0× 597 1.1× 938 2.1× 166 0.5× 86 3.3k
F.K. Winkler Switzerland 18 2.5k 1.2× 385 0.5× 453 0.8× 432 1.0× 97 0.3× 32 4.1k
Jack S. Benner United States 35 4.1k 1.9× 808 1.1× 309 0.6× 344 0.8× 84 0.3× 56 4.7k
H. Berglund Sweden 23 3.2k 1.5× 458 0.6× 213 0.4× 373 0.9× 150 0.5× 39 4.3k
Stephen J. Benkovic United States 33 3.2k 1.5× 284 0.4× 477 0.9× 243 0.6× 181 0.6× 83 4.4k
Justin P. Gallivan United States 22 2.9k 1.4× 471 0.7× 700 1.3× 163 0.4× 177 0.6× 27 4.2k
Terukiyo Hanafusa Japan 34 1.0k 0.5× 781 1.1× 1.5k 2.7× 162 0.4× 246 0.8× 174 3.6k
Ilian Jelesarov Switzerland 38 3.4k 1.6× 406 0.6× 267 0.5× 243 0.6× 84 0.3× 72 4.6k
Owen Johnson United Kingdom 4 1.8k 0.8× 307 0.4× 584 1.0× 367 0.8× 579 1.8× 6 3.3k
Stephen V. Evans Canada 31 2.9k 1.4× 301 0.4× 1.3k 2.2× 190 0.4× 125 0.4× 106 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark M. Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark M. Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark M. Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark M. Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark M. Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark M. Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark M. Garner. The network helps show where Mark M. Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark M. Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark M. Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark M. Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark M. Garner. Mark M. Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Highsmith, W. Edward, Qian Jin, Arun J. Nataraj, et al.. (1999). Use of a DNA toolbox for the characterization of mutation scanning methods. I: Construction of the toolbox and evaluation of heteroduplex analysis. Electrophoresis. 20(6). 1186–1194. 30 indexed citations
2.
Kusukawa, Noriko, et al.. (1999). Effect of gelation conditions on the gel structure and resolving power of agarose-based DNA sequencing gels. Electrophoresis. 20(7). 1455–1461. 33 indexed citations
3.
Klepárnı́k, Karel, Mark M. Garner, & Petr Boček. (1995). Injection bias of DNA fragments in capillary electrophoresis with sieving. Journal of Chromatography A. 698(1-2). 375–383. 20 indexed citations
4.
5.
Radko, Sergey P., Alexander Sokoloff, Mark M. Garner, & Andreas Chrambach. (1995). Capillary electrophoresis of rat liver microsomes in polymer solutions. Electrophoresis. 16(1). 981–992. 16 indexed citations
6.
Weiss, George H., Mark M. Garner, Elena G. Yarmola, Petr Boček, & Andreas Chrambach. (1995). A comparison of resolution of DNA fragments between agarose gel and capillary zone electrophoresis in agarose solutions. Electrophoresis. 16(1). 1345–1353. 14 indexed citations
7.
Chrambach, Andreas, et al.. (1995). Commercial automated gel electrophoresis apparatus: Application to DNA, band dispersion, nonlinear Ferguson curves, and isolation. Electrophoresis. 16(1). 713–718. 5 indexed citations
8.
Buzás, Zsuzsanna, David Wheeler, Mark M. Garner, Dietmar Tietz, & Andreas Chrambach. (1994). Transverse pore gradient gel electrophoresis, using the PhastSystem. Electrophoresis. 15(1). 1028–1031. 6 indexed citations
9.
Garner, Mark M. & MB Burg. (1994). Macromolecular crowding and confinement in cells exposed to hypertonicity. American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology. 266(4). C877–C892. 123 indexed citations
11.
Pulyaeva, Helena, et al.. (1994). Detection of a single base mismatch in double‐stranded DNA by electrophoresis on uncrosslinked polyacrylamide gel. Electrophoresis. 15(1). 1095–1100. 7 indexed citations
12.
Arndt‐Jovin, D. J., et al.. (1993). Z-DNA binding and inhibition by GTP of Drosophila topoisomerase II. Biochemistry. 32(18). 4862–4872. 26 indexed citations
13.
Orbán, László, Mark M. Garner, David Wheeler, Dietmar Tietz, & Andreas Chrambach. (1993). Characterization of the electrophoretic properties of nucleosome core particles by transverse polyacrylamide pore gradient gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 14(1). 720–724. 14 indexed citations
14.
Pulyaeva, Helena, et al.. (1993). Capillary zone electrophoresis of large DNA. Electrophoresis. 14(1). 523–530. 28 indexed citations
15.
Wheeler, David, László Orbán, Mark M. Garner, & Andreas Chrambach. (1992). Computer-aided analysis of DNA curves on transverse gradient gels. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods. 24(3-4). 171–180. 11 indexed citations
16.
Tietz, Dietmar, et al.. (1992). Advances in DNA electrophoresis in polymer solutions. Electrophoresis. 13(1). 614–616. 23 indexed citations
17.
Pulyaeva, Helena, David Wheeler, Mark M. Garner, & Andreas Chrambach. (1992). Molecular sieving of lambda phage DNA in polyacrylamide solutions as a function of the molecular weight of the polymer. Electrophoresis. 13(1). 608–614. 21 indexed citations
18.
Garner, Mark M., et al.. (1992). Resolution of circular, nicked circular and linear DNA, 4.4 kb in length, by electrophoresis in polyacrylamide solutions. Electrophoresis. 13(1). 176–178. 21 indexed citations
19.
Garner, Mark M., et al.. (1991). Electrophoretic size separation of particles with diameters in the micron range, using polymer solutions.. PubMed. 2(4-5). 151–7.
20.
Garner, Mark M. & Gary Felsenfeld. (1987). Effect of Z-DNA on nucleosome placement. Journal of Molecular Biology. 196(3). 581–590. 86 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026