Mark Lucas

1.2k total citations
9 papers, 78 citations indexed

About

Mark Lucas is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Oncology and Cancer Research. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Lucas has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 78 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Pathology and Forensic Medicine, 3 papers in Oncology and 3 papers in Cancer Research. Recurrent topics in Mark Lucas's work include Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). Mark Lucas is often cited by papers focused on Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (3 papers) and Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (2 papers). Mark Lucas collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Singapore. Mark Lucas's co-authors include Alexander Dobrovic, Angela Tan, Stephen B. Fox, John P. Parisot, Andrew Fellowes, Ravikiran Vedururu, Jason Ellul, David M. Thomas, Stephen Q. Wong and Debra E. Irwin and has published in prestigious journals such as British Journal of Cancer, European Journal of Cancer and Drug Discovery Today.

In The Last Decade

Mark Lucas

9 papers receiving 76 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Lucas Australia 5 36 20 16 15 13 9 78
Ashlyn S. Everett United States 5 12 0.3× 41 2.0× 15 0.9× 29 1.9× 6 0.5× 16 99
Miriam O’Connor Ireland 7 37 1.0× 44 2.2× 6 0.4× 23 1.5× 2 0.2× 19 117
Angela Stefania Ribecco Italy 7 21 0.6× 59 3.0× 7 0.4× 25 1.7× 7 0.5× 13 91
Douglas Chee Singapore 7 26 0.7× 11 0.6× 11 0.7× 8 0.5× 10 0.8× 14 142
Zoubida Zaidi Algeria 6 21 0.6× 61 3.0× 15 0.9× 21 1.4× 2 0.2× 17 131
Alexa Gillman United Kingdom 4 12 0.3× 15 0.8× 5 0.3× 10 0.7× 3 0.2× 9 90
M. Carmen Carmona-García Spain 6 15 0.4× 61 3.0× 15 0.9× 14 0.9× 4 0.3× 9 86
Polly A. Newcomb United States 5 55 1.5× 100 5.0× 8 0.5× 14 0.9× 5 0.4× 5 196
Ana Patricia Alcasabas Philippines 7 10 0.3× 30 1.5× 11 0.7× 38 2.5× 4 0.3× 12 100
Florence Poncet France 6 24 0.7× 93 4.7× 15 0.9× 13 0.9× 3 0.2× 10 122

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Lucas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Lucas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Lucas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Lucas. The network helps show where Mark Lucas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Lucas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Lucas. Mark Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
1.
Biswas, Sinjini, Diem Dinh, Mark Lucas, et al.. (2020). Incidence and Predictors of Unplanned Hospital Readmission after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 9(10). 3242–3242. 10 indexed citations
2.
Biswas, Sinjini, Diem Dinh, Mark Lucas, et al.. (2019). Impact of limited English proficiency on presentation and clinical outcomes of patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention. European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes. 6(4). 254–262. 11 indexed citations
3.
Lucas, Mark, Sarah E. Connor, Jeremy Millar, et al.. (2019). Development of Technologic Solutions to Address Complex Local Requirements of an International Prostate Cancer Clinical Quality Registry. JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics. 3(3). 1–11. 1 indexed citations
4.
Biswas, Sinjini, Diem Dinh, Mark Lucas, et al.. (2019). Impact of Limited English Proficiency on Ischaemic Time and Clinical Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction. Heart Lung and Circulation. 28. S403–S404. 1 indexed citations
5.
Parisot, John P., Heather Thorne, Andrew Fellowes, et al.. (2015). “Cancer 2015”: A Prospective, Population-Based Cancer Cohort—Phase 1: Feasibility of Genomics-Guided Precision Medicine in the Clinic. Journal of Personalized Medicine. 5(4). 354–369. 8 indexed citations
6.
Thomas, David M., Stephen B. Fox, Paula Lorgelly, et al.. (2015). Cancer 2015: a longitudinal whole-of-system study of genomic cancer medicine. Drug Discovery Today. 20(12). 1429–1432. 2 indexed citations
7.
Wong, Stephen Q., Andrew Fellowes, Jason Ellul, et al.. (2015). Assessing the clinical value of targeted massively parallel sequencing in a longitudinal, prospective population-based study of cancer patients. British Journal of Cancer. 112(8). 1411–1420. 40 indexed citations
8.
Marı́n, Mónica, et al.. (2015). 1553 Complementary and alternative medicine in oncology patients. European Journal of Cancer. 51. S222–S222. 1 indexed citations
9.
Henrich, William L., et al.. (1976). Adrenal insufficiency after unilateral radical nephrectomy. Urology. 8(6). 584–585. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026