Mark L. Weber
-
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research 16
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Developmental Neuroscience top 10%
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 3
-
- Ion channel regulation and function 6
- Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling 4
- Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study 3
- Chemical Synthesis and Analysis 2
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 2
-
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments 2
- Co-authors
- Charles P. TaylorArup DasRichard M. LoPachinEllen J. LehningMichael A. ManciniRobert N. FrankSean D. DonevanAndrás Kovács
- Journals
- Journal of Medicinal Chemistry (3 papers)Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics (2 papers)Neuroscience (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Mark L. Weber
29 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 517
- Biological Psychiatry 35
- Neurology 115
- Developmental Neuroscience 43
- Ophthalmology 91
Countries citing papers authored by Mark L. Weber
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark L. Weber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark L. Weber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark L. Weber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark L. Weber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark L. Weber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark L. Weber. The network helps show where Mark L. Weber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark L. Weber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 22 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 44 | |
| 6 | 2012 | 28 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 119 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 173 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 71 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 53 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 14 | |
| 12 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 13 | 1994 | 101 | |
| 14 | 1993 | 49 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 16 | 1990 | 35 | |
| 17 | 1989 | 27 | |
| 18 | 1989 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 62 | |
| 20 | [Trichopoliodystrophy or Menkes disease]. | 1980 | 4 |
About Mark L. Weber
Mark L. Weber is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry, Neurology, Developmental Neuroscience and Ophthalmology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers), Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers), Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (4 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors Study (3 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (2 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (517 citations), Biological Psychiatry (35 citations), Neurology (115 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (43 citations) and Ophthalmology (91 citations). Mark L. Weber has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Charles P. Taylor, Arup Das, Richard M. LoPachin, Ellen J. Lehning, Michael A. Mancini, Robert N. Frank, Sean D. Donevan, András Kovács, HS Jacob and Mark G. Vartanian. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Neuroscience, Brain Research and Current Eye Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.