Mark Keith

2.7k total citations
54 papers, 724 citations indexed

About

Mark Keith is a scholar working on Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Ecological Modeling. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Keith has authored 54 papers receiving a total of 724 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Ecology, 18 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 15 papers in Ecological Modeling. Recurrent topics in Mark Keith's work include Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (32 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers). Mark Keith is often cited by papers focused on Wildlife Ecology and Conservation (32 papers), Bat Biology and Ecology Studies (18 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (15 papers). Mark Keith collaborates with scholars based in South Africa, United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Mark Keith's co-authors include Peter J. Taylor, Lourens H. Swanepoel, Steven R. Belmain, Leszek Karczmarski, Russel D. Andrews, P J Nico de Bruyn, Ryan R Reisinger, Ara Monadjem, Samual T. Williams and Jason P. Marshal and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Ecology and Marine Ecology Progress Series.

In The Last Decade

Mark Keith

50 papers receiving 697 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Keith South Africa 15 561 136 122 116 115 54 724
Andrew Lyons United States 7 511 0.9× 114 0.8× 108 0.9× 89 0.8× 95 0.8× 16 645
Gail M. Blundell United States 16 719 1.3× 173 1.3× 139 1.1× 118 1.0× 145 1.3× 31 907
Marta Elena Fabián Brazil 14 426 0.8× 81 0.6× 221 1.8× 84 0.7× 43 0.4× 38 571
V. V. Robin India 17 289 0.5× 145 1.1× 157 1.3× 138 1.2× 196 1.7× 38 615
Vikash Tatayah United Kingdom 17 506 0.9× 234 1.7× 180 1.5× 115 1.0× 110 1.0× 56 803
Sarah T. Saalfeld United States 13 713 1.3× 108 0.8× 209 1.7× 215 1.9× 90 0.8× 34 868
Brent J. Sewall United States 15 270 0.5× 86 0.6× 323 2.6× 112 1.0× 90 0.8× 34 609
Kendrew Colhoun United Kingdom 16 773 1.4× 141 1.0× 256 2.1× 162 1.4× 90 0.8× 35 952
Stewart G. Liley United States 8 639 1.1× 126 0.9× 220 1.8× 96 0.8× 219 1.9× 12 869
Justin A. Pitt Canada 11 742 1.3× 106 0.8× 135 1.1× 88 0.8× 105 0.9× 15 855

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Keith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Keith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Keith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Keith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Keith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Keith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Keith. The network helps show where Mark Keith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Keith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Keith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Keith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Keith. Mark Keith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mortlock, Marinda, Marike Geldenhuys, Mark Keith, et al.. (2025). Paramyxo- and coronavirus diversity and host associations in non-volant small mammals: evidence of viral sharing. Virus Evolution. 11(1). veaf041–veaf041.
2.
Donnet, Sophie, Mark Keith, Mike Peel, et al.. (2024). Using the multivariate Hawkes process to study interactions between multiple species from camera trap data. Ecology. 105(4). e4237–e4237. 3 indexed citations
3.
Keith, Mark, et al.. (2024). The ‘Why’ Behind the Lie: Towards a Better Understanding of Health Information Disclosure in the Patient-Provider Interaction. Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
4.
Getz, Wayne M., Michelle Henley, Dana P. Seidel, et al.. (2024). Habitat use strategies of African elephants under different seasonal and ecological constraints. Wildlife Research. 51(9).
5.
Venter, Jan A., et al.. (2023). Temporal partitioning and the potential for avoidance behaviour within South African carnivore communities. Ecology and Evolution. 13(8). e10380–e10380. 4 indexed citations
6.
Broders, Hugh G., et al.. (2022). Reproductive status affects isotopic niches of Miniopterus natalensis in northeastern South Africa. Journal of Mammalogy. 103(4). 795–804. 1 indexed citations
7.
Venter, Jan A., et al.. (2022). Varying degrees of spatio-temporal partitioning among large carnivores in a fenced reserve, South Africa. Wildlife Research. 49(5). 477–490. 4 indexed citations
8.
Markotter, Wanda, et al.. (2021). Assessing the extent of land-use change around important bat-inhabited caves. BMC Zoology. 6(1). 31–31. 6 indexed citations
9.
Coertse, Jessica, et al.. (2021). Surveillance of the rabies-related lyssavirus, Mokola in non-volant small mammals in South Africa. Onderstepoort Journal of Veterinary Research. 88(1). e1–e13. 5 indexed citations
10.
Keith, Mark, et al.. (2021). Predation risk effects on intense and routine vigilance of Burchell's zebra and blue wildebeest. Animal Behaviour. 173. 159–168. 3 indexed citations
11.
Broders, Hugh G., et al.. (2020). Threat analysis of modelled potential migratory routes forMiniopterus natalensisin South Africa. Austral Ecology. 45(8). 1110–1122. 2 indexed citations
12.
Broders, Hugh G., et al.. (2020). Climatic correlates of migrant Natal long-fingered bat (Miniopterus natalensis) phenology in north-eastern South Africa. Wildlife Research. 47(5). 404–414. 5 indexed citations
13.
Keith, Mark, et al.. (2020). Bat Species Richness and Community Composition along a Mega-transect in the Okavango River Basin. Diversity. 12(5). 188–188. 5 indexed citations
15.
Foord, Stefan H., Lourens H. Swanepoel, Steven W. Evans, et al.. (2018). Animal taxa contrast in their scale-dependent responses to land use change in rural Africa. PLoS ONE. 13(5). e0194336–e0194336. 15 indexed citations
16.
Swanepoel, Lourens H., C. M. Swanepoel, Peter Brown, et al.. (2017). A systematic review of rodent pest research in Afro-Malagasy small-holder farming systems: Are we asking the right questions?. PLoS ONE. 12(3). e0174554–e0174554. 55 indexed citations
17.
Parrini, Francesca, et al.. (2016). Home range establishment and utilization by reintroduced lions (Panthera leo) in a small South African wildlife reserve. Integrative Zoology. 12(4). 318–332. 14 indexed citations
18.
McManus, Jeannine, Desiré L. Dalton, Antoinette Kotzé, et al.. (2014). Gene flow and population structure of a solitary top carnivore in a human‐dominated landscape. Ecology and Evolution. 5(2). 335–344. 40 indexed citations
19.
Victor, Janine E. & Mark Keith. (2004). The Orange List: a safety net for biodiversity in South Africa. South African Journal of Science. 100. 139–141. 19 indexed citations
20.
Keith, Mark, Victor M. Peddemors, M.N. Bester, & James Ferguson. (2002). Population characteristics of Indo-Pacific humpback dolphins at Richards Bay, South Africa: implications for incidental capture in shark nets. African Journal of Wildlife Research. 32(2). 153–162. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026