Mark Keil

1.5k total citations
43 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Mark Keil is a scholar working on Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Spectroscopy and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Keil has authored 43 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 36 papers in Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, 11 papers in Spectroscopy and 7 papers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark Keil's work include Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (14 papers). Mark Keil is often cited by papers focused on Quantum, superfluid, helium dynamics (20 papers), Advanced Chemical Physics Studies (16 papers) and Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (14 papers). Mark Keil collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Mark Keil's co-authors include Aron Kuppermann, Gregory A. Parker, J. C. Polanyi, Peter J. Dunlop, Jack A. Barnes, Howard R. Mayne, R. Folman, Yonathan Japha, David K. Lewis and David Groswasser and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, The Journal of Chemical Physics and The Journal of Physical Chemistry.

In The Last Decade

Mark Keil

42 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Keil Canada 20 928 435 189 95 84 43 1.1k
T. P. Schafer United States 9 931 1.0× 329 0.8× 202 1.1× 93 1.0× 131 1.6× 9 1.1k
Michał Przybytek Poland 17 972 1.0× 270 0.6× 187 1.0× 45 0.5× 130 1.5× 32 1.2k
J. Schaefer Germany 19 890 1.0× 560 1.3× 329 1.7× 31 0.3× 78 0.9× 37 1.1k
Y. T. Lee United States 7 772 0.8× 199 0.5× 142 0.8× 76 0.8× 164 2.0× 7 948
J. Schleusener Israel 14 589 0.6× 329 0.8× 141 0.7× 30 0.3× 35 0.4× 16 670
M. Braunstein United States 22 791 0.9× 481 1.1× 314 1.7× 21 0.2× 62 0.7× 62 1.1k
K.B. Woodall Canada 8 755 0.8× 598 1.4× 292 1.5× 32 0.3× 23 0.3× 25 1.0k
John H. Carpenter United Kingdom 18 418 0.5× 350 0.8× 222 1.2× 70 0.7× 88 1.0× 63 816
B. J. Krohn United States 22 841 0.9× 728 1.7× 290 1.5× 200 2.1× 52 0.6× 46 1.3k
Y. Le Duff France 20 651 0.7× 497 1.1× 314 1.7× 60 0.6× 59 0.7× 52 838

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Keil

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Keil's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Keil with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Keil more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Keil

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Keil. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Keil. The network helps show where Mark Keil may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Keil

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Keil. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Keil based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Keil. Mark Keil is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Groswasser, David, et al.. (2016). Robust spatial coherence5μmfrom a room-temperature atom chip. Physical review. A. 93(6). 1 indexed citations
2.
Chabé, Julien, et al.. (2014). Phase space tomography of cold-atom dynamics in a weakly corrugated potential. Physical Review A. 90(3). 8 indexed citations
3.
Groswasser, David, et al.. (2009). Retroreflecting polarization spectroscopy enabling miniaturization. Review of Scientific Instruments. 80(9). 93103–93103. 4 indexed citations
4.
Zhang, Qun, Yang Chen, & Mark Keil. (2009). Laser-induced atomic fragment fluorescence spectroscopy: A facile technique for molecular spectroscopy of spin-forbidden states. Review of Scientific Instruments. 80(3). 33111–33111.
5.
Demtröder, Wolfgang, et al.. (2001). ENERGY TRANSFER PROCESSES IN ATOMS AND MOLECULES. 123–145. 1 indexed citations
6.
Larson, Preston R., et al.. (2000). Atomic fluorine beam etching of silicon and related materials. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology B Microelectronics and Nanometer Structures Processing Measurement and Phenomena. 18(1). 307–312. 13 indexed citations
7.
Phillips, Timothy R., et al.. (1997). Vibrationally and rotationally resolved angular distributions for F+H2→HF(ν,j)+H reactive scattering. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 106(23). 9950–9953. 32 indexed citations
8.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1993). Quantum effects in the inelastic scattering of HF and DF by argon. Chemical Physics Letters. 202(3-4). 291–296. 19 indexed citations
9.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1992). Anisotropic repulsive potential energy surfaces from Hartree–Fock calculations for HeCO2 and HeOCS. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 96(9). 6621–6628. 24 indexed citations
10.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1989). Use of a chemical laser for molecular-beam scattering experiments. Journal of the Optical Society of America B. 6(7). 1278–1278. 5 indexed citations
11.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1988). The HeNe interatomic potential from multiproperty fits and Hartree–Fock calculations. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 89(5). 2866–2880. 27 indexed citations
12.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1988). Interatomic potentials for HeAr, HeKr, and HeXe from multiproperty fits. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 88(2). 851–870. 48 indexed citations
13.
Keil, Mark & Gregory A. Parker. (1985). Empirical potential for the He+CO2 interaction: Multiproperty fitting in the infinite-order sudden approximation. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 82(4). 1947–1966. 51 indexed citations
14.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1982). General discussion. Faraday Discussions of the Chemical Society. 73. 173–173. 1 indexed citations
15.
Keil, Mark & Howard R. Mayne. (1982). Classical dependence of polarization on potential energy surface in rotationally inelastic collisions. Chemical Physics Letters. 85(4). 456–460. 5 indexed citations
16.
Barnes, Jack A., et al.. (1982). Energy transfer as a function of collision energy. IV. State-to-state cross sections for rotational-to-translational energy transfer in HF+Ne, Ar, and Kr. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 76(2). 913–930. 49 indexed citations
17.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1979). Scattering of thermal He beams by crossed atomic and molecular beams. III. Anisotropic intermolecular potentials for He + N2, O2, CO, and NO. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 70(1). 541–551. 112 indexed citations
18.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1979). Scattering of thermal He beams by crossed atomic and molecular beams. IV. Spherically symmetric intermolecular potentials for He+CH4, NH3, H2O, SF6. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 70(3). 1482–1491. 55 indexed citations
19.
Keil, Mark, et al.. (1978). An accurate determination of the HeAr van der Waals potential. Chemical Physics Letters. 59(2). 339–345. 2 indexed citations
20.
Lewis, David K., et al.. (1974). Cyclopentene decomposition in shock waves. The Journal of Physical Chemistry. 78(4). 436–439. 16 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. P. Schafer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michał Przybytek Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Schaefer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Y. T. Lee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. Schleusener Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Braunstein Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by K.B. Woodall Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John H. Carpenter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. J. Krohn Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Y. Le Duff
Rankless by CCL
2026