Mark K. L. Wong

1.2k citations
24 papers · 620 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

Mark K. L. Wong

22 papers receiving 604 citations

Hit Papers

The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earth20222026202320242022255075100

Peers

Mark K. L. Wong
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 342
  • Genetics 284
  • Ecology 183
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation 163
  • Ecological Modeling 115
Replace Ivan Hadrián Tuf with:
Ivan Hadrián Tuf Czechia
Chuan‐Kai Ho United States
Natalie A. Clay United States
Peter S. Grimbacher Australia
Rebecca J. Best United States
Anna Bucharová Germany
Alain Canard France
Sean R. Griffin United States
José Wellington de Morais Brazil
Helen J. Read United Kingdom
Mark K. L. Wong relative to Ivan Hadrián Tuf Czechia Ivan Hadrián Tuf's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Ivan Hadrián Tuf · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark K. L. Wong

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark K. L. Wong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark K. L. Wong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark K. L. Wong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark K. L. Wong

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark K. L. Wong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark K. L. Wong. The network helps show where Mark K. L. Wong may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark K. L. Wong

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark K. L. Wong. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark K. L. Wong based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark K. L. Wong. Mark K. L. Wong is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 20
4 2
5 30
6 3
7
The abundance, biomass, and distribution of ants on Earthbreakdown →
117
8 41
9 12
10 30
11 170
12 39
13 8
14 3
15 4
16 53
17 21
18 37
19 5
20
Tropical insect diversity and seasonality. Sweep-samples vs. light-traps
15

About Mark K. L. Wong

Mark K. L. Wong is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 620 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Plant and animal studies (13 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (115 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (342 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (163 citations). Mark K. L. Wong has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Benoît Guénard, Owen T. Lewis, Carlos P. Carmona, Sabine S. Nooten, Runxi Wang, Patrick Schultheiss, François Brassard, Alessandro Cantelli, Chris Paola and Gary Parker. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Current Biology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026