Mark Johnson

1.1k total citations
11 papers, 179 citations indexed

About

Mark Johnson is a scholar working on Surgery, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Johnson has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 179 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine and 3 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark Johnson's work include Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). Mark Johnson is often cited by papers focused on Anesthesia and Pain Management (3 papers), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). Mark Johnson collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, United States and Australia. Mark Johnson's co-authors include Donal J. Buggy, Helen C. Gallagher, Andrew Foley, Peter D. Crowley, Cailin Xue, Cara Connolly, Rachel Todd, Alison Birtle, Richard T. Bryan and Paul Fennessy and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, British Journal of Anaesthesia and Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mark Johnson

10 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Johnson Ireland 5 106 80 34 29 21 11 179
D Finnerty Ireland 6 186 1.8× 46 0.6× 14 0.4× 26 0.9× 94 4.5× 9 261
Xue-Ying Li China 2 61 0.6× 51 0.6× 17 0.5× 24 0.8× 12 0.6× 2 98
Aisling Ní Eochagáin Ireland 8 168 1.6× 46 0.6× 8 0.2× 22 0.8× 76 3.6× 17 216
Andrew Kofke United States 8 34 0.3× 4 0.1× 41 1.2× 9 0.3× 10 0.5× 12 263
Bailin Jiang China 9 73 0.7× 2 0.0× 32 0.9× 16 0.6× 56 2.7× 24 181
Alexander R. Schmidt United States 4 51 0.5× 6 0.1× 21 0.6× 4 0.1× 5 0.2× 7 127
Joseph R. Keen United States 8 37 0.3× 21 0.3× 27 0.8× 2 0.1× 18 264
Keith Bourgeois United States 5 29 0.3× 31 0.4× 15 0.4× 1 0.0× 7 0.3× 5 173
Seyedeh Niloufar Rafiei Alavi Iran 7 18 0.2× 2 0.0× 22 0.6× 9 0.3× 18 0.9× 18 125
Bernard le Polain de Waroux Belgium 7 64 0.6× 6 0.1× 7 0.2× 3 0.1× 17 0.8× 11 107

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Johnson. The network helps show where Mark Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Johnson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Johnson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Johnson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Johnson. Mark Johnson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Johnson, Mark, et al.. (2021). Mitral valve-in-valve implantation during pregnancy. BMJ Case Reports. 14(11). e244270–e244270. 3 indexed citations
2.
Johnson, Mark, et al.. (2019). Anaesthesia for total hip and knee replacement: A review of patient education materials available online. F1000Research. 8. 416–416. 4 indexed citations
3.
Missair, Andres, Juan P. Cata, Gina Votta‐Velis, et al.. (2019). Impact of perioperative pain management on cancer recurrence: an ASRA/ESRA special article. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 44(1). 13–28. 34 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Mark, Peter D. Crowley, Andrew Foley, et al.. (2018). Effect of perioperative lidocaine on metastasis after sevoflurane or ketamine-xylazine anaesthesia for breast tumour resection in a murine model. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 121(1). 76–85. 63 indexed citations
5.
Birtle, Alison, John Chester, Mark Johnson, et al.. (2018). Results of POUT: A phase III randomised trial of perioperative chemotherapy versus surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC).. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 36(6_suppl). 407–407. 53 indexed citations
6.
Fennessy, Paul, et al.. (2017). Establishing a new national standard for the documentation of regional anaesthesia in Ireland. BMJ Open Quality. 6(2). e000210–e000210. 8 indexed citations
7.
Johnson, Mark, Peter D. Crowley, Andrew Foley, et al.. (2017). Does perioperative i.v. lidocaine infusion during tumour resection surgery reduce metastatic disease in the 4T1 mouse model of breast cancer?. British Journal of Anaesthesia. 120(1). e1–e2. 3 indexed citations
10.
Birtle, Alison, Rebecca Lewis, J F Chester, et al.. (2013). 81 Peri-operative chemotherapy or surveillance in upper tract urothelial cancer (POUT – CRUK/11/027) – a randomised controlled trial to define standard post-operative management. European Urology Supplements. 12(1). e81–e82. 1 indexed citations
11.
Johnson, Mark, et al.. (2011). Clinical inquiries. How effective--and safe--are systemic steroids for acute low back pain?. PubMed. 60(5). 297–8. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026