Mark J. Pecaut

838 total citations
10 papers, 457 citations indexed

About

Mark J. Pecaut is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark J. Pecaut has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 457 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics, 4 papers in Instrumentation and 1 paper in Nuclear and High Energy Physics. Recurrent topics in Mark J. Pecaut's work include Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers). Mark J. Pecaut is often cited by papers focused on Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (10 papers), Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (8 papers) and Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers). Mark J. Pecaut collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Russia. Mark J. Pecaut's co-authors include Eric E. Mamajek, Matthew D. Kenworthy, Christine Chen, Alycia J. Weinberger, K. Y. L. Su, Alice C. Quillen, N. Parley, A. Collier Cameron, A. J. Bohn and C. Ginski and has published in prestigious journals such as The Astrophysical Journal, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society and Astronomy and Astrophysics.

In The Last Decade

Mark J. Pecaut

10 papers receiving 430 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark J. Pecaut United States 7 438 118 20 18 13 10 457
Daryll M. LaCourse United States 13 441 1.0× 123 1.0× 22 1.1× 14 0.8× 34 2.6× 34 456
N. Gorlova Belgium 12 618 1.4× 155 1.3× 21 1.1× 15 0.8× 17 1.3× 19 626
E. Herrero Spain 11 284 0.6× 134 1.1× 17 0.8× 24 1.3× 22 1.7× 22 302
Courtney McGahee United States 3 340 0.8× 155 1.3× 10 0.5× 11 0.6× 17 1.3× 4 345
A. Lèbre France 15 558 1.3× 167 1.4× 7 0.3× 13 0.7× 17 1.3× 28 566
T. O. B. Schmidt Germany 15 492 1.1× 134 1.1× 19 0.9× 14 0.8× 15 1.2× 39 503
F. J. Alonso-Floriano Spain 9 360 0.8× 166 1.4× 29 1.4× 17 0.9× 17 1.3× 16 365
M. Siwak Poland 11 347 0.8× 82 0.7× 13 0.7× 11 0.6× 21 1.6× 31 356
Eric Stempels United States 8 349 0.8× 101 0.9× 14 0.7× 17 0.9× 7 0.5× 73 357
D. T. Andreasen Portugal 8 213 0.5× 97 0.8× 10 0.5× 9 0.5× 19 1.5× 11 217

Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Pecaut

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Pecaut's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Pecaut with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Pecaut more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Pecaut

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Pecaut. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Pecaut. The network helps show where Mark J. Pecaut may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. Pecaut

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. Pecaut. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. Pecaut based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. Pecaut. Mark J. Pecaut is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Bohn, A. J., C. Ginski, Matthew D. Kenworthy, et al.. (2021). Discovery of a directly imaged planet to the young solar analog YSES 2. Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
2.
Bohn, A. J., C. Ginski, Matthew D. Kenworthy, et al.. (2021). Unveiling wide-orbit companions to K-type stars in Sco-Cen withGaiaEDR3. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 657. A53–A53. 3 indexed citations
3.
Bohn, A. J., Matthew D. Kenworthy, C. Ginski, et al.. (2020). Two Directly Imaged, Wide-orbit Giant Planets around the Young, Solar Analog TYC 8998-760-1*. The Astrophysical Journal Letters. 898(1). L16–L16. 38 indexed citations
4.
Bohn, A. J., Matthew D. Kenworthy, C. Ginski, et al.. (2019). The Young Suns Exoplanet Survey: Detection of a wide-orbit planetary-mass companion to a solar-type Sco-Cen member. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 492(1). 431–443. 35 indexed citations
5.
Bohn, A. J., Matthew D. Kenworthy, C. Ginski, et al.. (2019). Discovery of a directly imaged disk in scattered light around the Sco-Cen member Wray 15-788. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 624. A87–A87. 12 indexed citations
6.
Mamajek, Eric E., D. J. James, K. L. Luhman, et al.. (2019). DECam survey for low-mass stars and substellar objects in the UCL and LCC subgroups of the Sco-Cen OB Association (SCOCENSUS). Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 484(4). 5049–5071. 1 indexed citations
7.
Pecaut, Mark J., et al.. (2017). Supernova ejecta in ocean cores used as time constraints for nearby stellar groups. Astronomische Nachrichten. 339(1). 78–86. 12 indexed citations
8.
Pecaut, Mark J. & Eric E. Mamajek. (2016). The star formation history and accretion-disc fraction among the K-type members of the Scorpius–Centaurus OB association. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 461(1). 794–815. 213 indexed citations
9.
10.
Chen, Christine, et al.. (2011). A MAGELLAN MIKE ANDSPITZERMIPS STUDY OF 1.5-1.0M☉STARS IN SCORPIUS-CENTAURUS. The Astrophysical Journal. 738(2). 122–122. 73 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daryll M. LaCourse Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by N. Gorlova Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by E. Herrero Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Courtney McGahee Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by A. Lèbre Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by T. O. B. Schmidt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by F. J. Alonso-Floriano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by M. Siwak Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eric Stempels Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. T. Andreasen
Rankless by CCL
2026