Mark J. Cartledge
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Religious studies top 1%
- Education
- Health
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Cephas N. OmenyoAndré DroogersAmos YongC. SmithCecil M. RobeckDaniel RamírezDavid MillsVeli‐Matti Kärkkäinen
- Topics
- Religion, Society, and Development (31 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (29 papers)Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (28 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Mark J. Cartledge
43 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Sociology and Political Science 117
- Religious studies 116
- Education 27
- Health 26
- Philosophy 26
Countries citing papers authored by Mark J. Cartledge
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark J. Cartledge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark J. Cartledge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark J. Cartledge more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark J. Cartledge
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark J. Cartledge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark J. Cartledge. The network helps show where Mark J. Cartledge may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark J. Cartledge
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark J. Cartledge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark J. Cartledge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark J. Cartledge. Mark J. Cartledge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | Can Theology Be Practical? Part I: A discussion of theory, practice, wisdom, spirituality and context | 1 |
| 9 | The Mediation of the Spirit: Interventions in Practical Theology | 4 |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Mark J. Cartledge
Mark J. Cartledge is a scholar working on Religious studies, Sociology and Political Science and Philosophy, having authored 56 papers that have together received 180 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religion, Society, and Development (31 papers), Christian Theology and Mission (29 papers) and Pentecostalism and Christianity Studies (28 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (116 citations), Health (26 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (117 citations). Mark J. Cartledge has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Cephas N. Omenyo, André Droogers, Amos Yong, C. Smith, Cecil M. Robeck, Daniel Ramírez, David Mills, Veli‐Matti Kärkkäinen, Michael Wilkinson and Leslie J. Francis. Their work appears in journals such as Mental Health Religion & Culture, Religion and Journal of Beliefs and Values.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.