Mark Horridge

3.2k total citations
73 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Mark Horridge is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Environmental Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Horridge has authored 73 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 20 papers in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and 10 papers in Environmental Engineering. Recurrent topics in Mark Horridge's work include Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (16 papers), Global trade and economics (12 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (10 papers). Mark Horridge is often cited by papers focused on Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (16 papers), Global trade and economics (12 papers) and Environmental Impact and Sustainability (10 papers). Mark Horridge collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United States and Brazil. Mark Horridge's co-authors include Glyn Wittwer, John R. Madden, Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira Filho, Ken Pearson, Jan van Heerden, James Blignaut, W. Jill Harrison, Thomas W. Hertel, Martín Cicowiez and Onil Banerjee and has published in prestigious journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Energy Policy and Ecological Economics.

In The Last Decade

Mark Horridge

69 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Horridge Australia 20 750 251 237 203 198 73 1.4k
C.‐Y. Cynthia Lin Lawell United States 25 900 1.2× 230 0.9× 140 0.6× 297 1.5× 633 3.2× 86 2.2k
Roger Perman United Kingdom 11 851 1.1× 210 0.8× 187 0.8× 104 0.5× 176 0.9× 22 1.3k
Harald Grethe Germany 19 437 0.6× 102 0.4× 143 0.6× 107 0.5× 190 1.0× 118 1.2k
Ching‐Cheng Chang Taiwan 21 642 0.9× 200 0.8× 144 0.6× 239 1.2× 92 0.5× 63 1.4k
Vicente Pinilla Spain 25 742 1.0× 151 0.6× 236 1.0× 414 2.0× 46 0.2× 121 2.0k
Charles Griffiths United States 17 846 1.1× 547 2.2× 48 0.2× 141 0.7× 166 0.8× 33 1.4k
Ben White Australia 21 908 1.2× 422 1.7× 61 0.3× 106 0.5× 92 0.5× 84 2.0k
M.W. Hofkes Netherlands 19 668 0.9× 122 0.5× 51 0.2× 219 1.1× 270 1.4× 62 1.2k
Budy P. Resosudarmo Australia 22 667 0.9× 193 0.8× 194 0.8× 111 0.5× 270 1.4× 105 1.7k
Irene Monasterolo Italy 22 2.2k 3.0× 347 1.4× 106 0.4× 174 0.9× 373 1.9× 86 3.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Horridge

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Horridge's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Horridge with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Horridge more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Horridge

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Horridge. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Horridge. The network helps show where Mark Horridge may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Horridge

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Horridge. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Horridge based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Horridge. Mark Horridge is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Heerden, Jan van, et al.. (2024). A supply‐side alternative for SRD grants in South Africa. South African Journal of Economics. 92(1). 69–79. 1 indexed citations
2.
Banerjee, Onil, Kenneth J. Bagstad, Martín Cicowiez, et al.. (2020). Economic, land use, and ecosystem services impacts of Rwanda's Green Growth Strategy: An application of the IEEM+ESM platform. The Science of The Total Environment. 729. 138779–138779. 32 indexed citations
3.
Rokicki, Bartłomiej, Eduardo A. Haddad, Mark Horridge, & Marcin Stępniak. (2020). Accessibility in the regional CGE framework: the effects of major transport infrastructure investments in Poland. Transportation. 48(2). 747–772. 27 indexed citations
4.
Baldos, Uris Lantz C., et al.. (2020). SIMPLE-G: A multiscale framework for integration of economic and biophysical determinants of sustainability. Environmental Modelling & Software. 133. 104805–104805. 26 indexed citations
5.
Taheripour, Farzad, et al.. (2020). Land use in computable general equilibrium models. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 5(2). 63–109. 5 indexed citations
6.
Banerjee, Onil, et al.. (2017). The SEEA-Based Integrated Economic-Environmental Modelling Framework: An Illustration with Guatemala’s Forest and Fuelwood Sector. Environmental and Resource Economics. 72(2). 539–558. 23 indexed citations
7.
Horridge, Mark, Bartłomiej Rokicki, & Katarzyna Zawalińska. (2017). Regionalny model równowagi ogólnej TERM i przykłady jego zastosowania w Polsce. 5 indexed citations
8.
Horridge, Mark, et al.. (2016). WATER DEMAND PROSPECTS IN BRAZIL: A SECTORAL EVALUATION USING AN INTER-REGIONAL CGE MODEL. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 3 indexed citations
9.
Giesecke, James, et al.. (2009). Brazilian Structural Adjustment to Rapid Growth in Fuel Ethanol Demand. Studies in Regional Science. 39(1). 189–207. 5 indexed citations
10.
Horridge, Mark, et al.. (2009). The World Increase in Ethanol Demand and Poverty in Brazil. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 2 indexed citations
11.
Horridge, Mark & Glyn Wittwer. (2008). SinoTERM, a multi-regional CGE model of China. China Economic Review. 19(4). 628–634. 54 indexed citations
12.
Filho, Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira & Mark Horridge. (2006). The Doha Development Agenda and Brazil: Distributional Impacts*. Review of Agricultural Economics. 28(3). 362–369. 7 indexed citations
13.
Heerden, Jan van, Reyer Gerlagh, James Blignaut, et al.. (2006). Searching for Triple Dividends in South Africa: Fighting CO2 pollution and poverty while promoting growth. The Energy Journal. 27(2). 113–142. 111 indexed citations
14.
Filho, Joaquim Bento de Souza Ferreira & Mark Horridge. (2006). Economic integration, poverty and regional inequality in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Economia. 60(4). 25 indexed citations
15.
Horridge, Mark, John R. Madden, & Glyn Wittwer. (2005). The impact of the 2002–2003 drought on Australia. Journal of Policy Modeling. 27(3). 285–308. 255 indexed citations
16.
Adams, Philip, Mark Horridge, John R. Madden, & Glyn Wittwer. (2002). Drought, Regions and the Australian Economy between 2001-02 and 2004-05. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 28(4). 231–246. 12 indexed citations
17.
Horridge, Mark & Philip Adams. (2000). Forecasts for Australian Regions using the MMRF-GREEN Model. Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University). 6(3). 293–322. 11 indexed citations
18.
Adams, Philip, et al.. (2000). Long-Run Effects on China of APEC Trade. Pacific Economic Review. 15–47. 1 indexed citations
19.
Harrison, W. Jill, Mark Horridge, & Ken Pearson. (2000). Decomposing Simulation Results with Respect to Exogenous Shocks. Computational Economics. 15(3). 227–249. 86 indexed citations
20.
Horridge, Mark. (1994). A computable general equilibrium model of urban transport demands. Journal of Policy Modeling. 16(4). 427–457. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026