Mark Hilberman

38 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Mark Hilberman
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Nephrology 277
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 180
  • Emergency Medicine 158
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 352
  • Developmental Neuroscience 62
Replace L. Hannemann with:
L. Hannemann Germany
Christian Zauner Austria
H. Brechtelsbauer Germany
K. Shibutani United States
Gösta Rooth Sweden
L.I.G. Worthley Australia
Emerson A. Moffitt United States
Myer H. Rosenthal United States
Shaman Jhanji United Kingdom
Helmut Reinelt Germany
Mark Hilberman relative to L. Hannemann Germany L. Hannemann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
L. Hannemann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Hilberman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Hilberman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Hilberman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Hilberman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Hilberman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Hilberman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Hilberman. The network helps show where Mark Hilberman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Hilberman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Hilberman Line = papers co-authored together Mark Hilberman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1979154
2 1980107
3 197974
4 198071
5 198664
6 197563
7 198460
8 198760
9 198659
10 198457
11 198736
12 197634
13 198034
14 198228
15 197227
16 198126
17 198024
18 199723
19 198121
20 197220

About Mark Hilberman

Mark Hilberman is a scholar working on Nephrology, Emergency Medicine, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Developmental Neuroscience and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 40 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (8 papers), Acute Kidney Injury Research (6 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (6 papers), Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy (5 papers), Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (5 papers), Renal function and acid-base balance (3 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (3 papers) and Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (277 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (180 citations), Emergency Medicine (158 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (352 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (62 citations). Mark Hilberman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Brazil. Frequent co-authors include Edward B. Stinson, Geraldine C. Derby, Bryan D. Myers, Brian J. Carrie, Rex L. Jamison, Richard M. Peters, Alan S. Michaels, B. D. Myers, John B. Cone and D. Craig Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Anesthesiology, Kidney International, Critical Care Medicine and Journal of Medical Ethics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026