Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Giordano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Giordano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Giordano more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Giordano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Giordano. The network helps show where Mark Giordano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Giordano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Giordano.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Giordano based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Giordano. Mark Giordano is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Suhardiman, Diana, Mark Giordano, Edwin Rap, & Kai Wegerich. (2014). Bureaucratic reform in irrigation: a review of four case studies. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.22 indexed citations
Pavelic, Paul, et al.. (2012). Groundwater availability and use in Sub-Saharan Africa: a review of 15 countries. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Mukherji, Aditi, et al.. (2010). Irrigation reform in Asia: a review of 108 cases of irrigation management transfer. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.13 indexed citations
Liao, Yongsong, Charlotte de Fraiture, & Mark Giordano. (2008). Global Trade and Water: Lessons from China and the WTO. Global Governance A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations. 14(4). 503–521.7 indexed citations
9.
Molden, David, Koen Frenken, R. Barker, et al.. (2007). Trends in water and agricultural development. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.79 indexed citations
10.
Giordano, Mark, et al.. (2007). Sub-Saharan Africa: opportunistic exploitation. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.11 indexed citations
Lautze, Jonathan & Mark Giordano. (2006). Equity in transboundary water law: Valuable paradigm or merely semantics?. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).5 indexed citations
13.
Ahmad, Mobin‐ud‐Din, et al.. (2006). Opportunities and challenges in saving water and improving productivity through resource conservation technologies: Examples from Pakistan. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).1 indexed citations
14.
Lautze, Jonathan & Mark Giordano. (2005). Transboundary water law in Africa: Development nature and geography. Natural resources journal. 45(4). 1053.31 indexed citations
15.
Lestrelin, Guillaume, et al.. (2005). When "conservation" leads to land degradation..7 indexed citations
Giordano, Mark. (2003). Economics and soil conservation on sloping lands: Nine hypotheses for MSEC Project implementation and research. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.