Mark Gartner

915 total citations
31 papers, 696 citations indexed

About

Mark Gartner is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Mechanical Engineering and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Gartner has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 696 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Biomedical Engineering, 9 papers in Mechanical Engineering and 7 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark Gartner's work include Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers) and Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (7 papers). Mark Gartner is often cited by papers focused on Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (11 papers), Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (7 papers) and Welding Techniques and Residual Stresses (7 papers). Mark Gartner collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and France. Mark Gartner's co-authors include Jay F. Tu, Elijah Kannatey‐Asibu, Harvey S. Borovetz, Robert Jarvik, Jason Weiss, Brian W. Duncan, J. Timothy Baldwin, William R. Wagner, Tracey R. Hoke and Greg W. Burgreen and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of Physics D Applied Physics and Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Mark Gartner

31 papers receiving 660 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark Gartner United States 13 368 274 217 139 114 31 696
M. Ertan Taskin United States 12 602 1.6× 151 0.6× 250 1.2× 242 1.7× 131 1.1× 17 937
Alexandrina Untăroiu United States 18 334 0.9× 523 1.9× 186 0.9× 145 1.0× 61 0.5× 111 1.0k
M. Giersiepen Denmark 12 378 1.0× 93 0.3× 257 1.2× 110 0.8× 60 0.5× 14 776
L. J. Wurzinger Germany 9 386 1.0× 77 0.3× 237 1.1× 92 0.7× 75 0.7× 18 823
Tomonori Tsukiya Japan 18 844 2.3× 166 0.6× 491 2.3× 42 0.3× 235 2.1× 121 1.0k
Luke H. Herbertson United States 13 350 1.0× 59 0.2× 89 0.4× 60 0.4× 50 0.4× 34 531
Katharine Fraser United Kingdom 16 881 2.4× 173 0.6× 475 2.2× 102 0.7× 190 1.7× 44 1.2k
Bente Thamsen Switzerland 15 530 1.4× 83 0.3× 329 1.5× 18 0.1× 152 1.3× 22 619
Kenneth I. Aycock United States 14 145 0.4× 57 0.2× 153 0.7× 87 0.6× 24 0.2× 22 448
Kenji Araki Japan 12 176 0.5× 94 0.3× 78 0.4× 78 0.6× 33 0.3× 46 395

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Gartner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Gartner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Gartner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Gartner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Gartner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Gartner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Gartner. The network helps show where Mark Gartner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Gartner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Gartner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Gartner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Gartner. Mark Gartner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ludwig, Daniel R., et al.. (2015). A Novel Toolkit to Improve Percutaneous Subxiphoid Needle Access to the Healthy Pericardial Sac. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. 26(5). 576–580. 11 indexed citations
2.
Hussain, Ali, et al.. (2015). Development and in vitro evaluation of infection resistant materials: A novel surface modification process for silicone and Dacron. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 30(7). 1103–1113. 6 indexed citations
3.
Baldwin, J. Timothy, Harvey S. Borovetz, Brian W. Duncan, et al.. (2011). The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Pediatric Circulatory Support Program. Circulation. 123(11). 1233–1240. 65 indexed citations
4.
Johnson, Greg A., Benjamin J. Curry, Linda Cahalan, et al.. (2011). In vitro assessment of blood compatibility: Residual and dynamic markers of cellular activation. Journal of Biomaterials Applications. 27(8). 925–936. 6 indexed citations
5.
Gartner, Mark, David Robinson, Huiyan Xu, et al.. (2009). A regional system for delivery of primary percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: STEMI-St. Cloud.. PubMed. 21(12). 639–44. 4 indexed citations
6.
Pantalos, George M., et al.. (2009). In Vitro Characterization and Performance Testing of the Ension Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Assist System. ASAIO Journal. 55(3). 282–286. 13 indexed citations
7.
Gartner, Mark, et al.. (2008). Computational Fluid Flow and Mass Transfer of a Functionally Integrated Pediatric Pump-Oxygenator Configuration. ASAIO Journal. 54(2). 214–219. 16 indexed citations
8.
Pantalos, George M., Guruprasad A. Giridharan, Michael E. Mitchell, et al.. (2007). Effect of Continuous and Pulsatile Flow Left Ventricular Assist on Pulsatility in a Pediatric Animal Model of Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Pilot Observations. ASAIO Journal. 53(3). 385–391. 19 indexed citations
9.
Giridharan, Guruprasad A., Steven C. Koenig, Michael E. Mitchell, Mark Gartner, & George M. Pantalos. (2007). A Computer Model of the Pediatric Circulatory System for Testing Pediatric Assist Devices. ASAIO Journal. 53(1). 74–81. 12 indexed citations
10.
Gartner, Mark, et al.. (2006). POROUS MEDIA TECHNIQUE FOR COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF A NOVEL PUMP-OXYGENATOR. ASAIO Journal. 52(2). 28A–28A. 4 indexed citations
11.
Wu, Zhongjun J., Mark Gartner, Kenneth N. Litwak, & Bartley P. Griffith. (2005). Progress toward an ambulatory pump-lung. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 130(4). 973–978. 15 indexed citations
12.
Gartner, Mark, et al.. (2002). Predicting Membrane Oxygenator Pressure Drop Using Computational Fluid Dynamics. Artificial Organs. 26(7). 600–607. 41 indexed citations
13.
Kannatey‐Asibu, Elijah, et al.. (2002). Monitoring of laser weld penetration using sensor fusion. Journal of Laser Applications. 14(2). 114–121. 44 indexed citations
14.
Gartner, Mark, et al.. (2000). Modeling Flow Effects on Thrombotic Deposition in a Membrane Oxygenator. Artificial Organs. 24(1). 29–36. 62 indexed citations
15.
Tu, Jay F., et al.. (1999). Laser Weld Penetration Estimation Using Temperature Measurements. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. 121(2). 179–188. 17 indexed citations
16.
Tu, Jay F., et al.. (1999). A Dynamic Model for Condition Monitoring of a High-Power CO2 Industrial Laser. Journal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control. 121(2). 157–164. 2 indexed citations
17.
Kannatey‐Asibu, Elijah, et al.. (1999). Sensor systems for real-time monitoring of laser weld quality. Journal of Laser Applications. 11(4). 153–168. 63 indexed citations
18.
Tu, Jay F., et al.. (1997). Predictive maintenance of an industrial laser using statistical process control charting. C57–C66. 5 indexed citations
19.
Tu, Jay F., et al.. (1997). A power distribution model of industrial CO2 lasers for system diagnosis. Journal of Laser Applications. 9(3). 161–169. 6 indexed citations
20.
Tu, Jay F., et al.. (1996). A model for estimating penetration depth of laser welding processes. Journal of Physics D Applied Physics. 29(7). 1831–1841. 115 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026