Mark Garside

729 total citations
10 papers, 85 citations indexed

About

Mark Garside is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Epidemiology and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark Garside has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 85 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Epidemiology and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Mark Garside's work include Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers). Mark Garside is often cited by papers focused on Acute Ischemic Stroke Management (2 papers), Medical Education and Admissions (2 papers) and Aging and Gerontology Research (2 papers). Mark Garside collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Portugal. Mark Garside's co-authors include James Fisher, Kelly A. Hunt, Adam Gordon, Christopher Price, Nelson Lo, Adrian Blundell, Peter Brock, M. Sudlow, Helen Rodgers and Richard Curless and has published in prestigious journals such as Age and Ageing, Emergency Medicine Journal and Clinical Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Mark Garside

9 papers receiving 81 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark Garside United Kingdom	6	32	32	20	14	14	10	85
Muthoni Gichu Kenya	5	38 1.2×	29 0.9×	13 0.7×	3 0.2×		6	140
Laeora Berkson Canada	4	47 1.5×	84 2.6×	11 0.6×	5 0.4×	8 0.6×	7	157
Mary Steele United Kingdom	7	53 1.7×	28 0.9×	9 0.5×	3 0.2×	4 0.3×	17	123
Anne-Kathrin Geier Germany	7	26 0.8×	36 1.1×	5 0.3×		14 1.0×	17	86
Cécile Laubarie-Mouret France	5	30 0.9×	14 0.4×	12 0.6×	3 0.2×		6	81
Tongling Yang China	6	38 1.2×	12 0.4×	14 0.7×	5 0.4×		10	128
Stephen M Quick Australia	4	22 0.7×	15 0.5×	9 0.5×	2 0.1×	1 0.1×	7	87
Siddhesh Zadey United States	7	39 1.2×	45 1.4×	11 0.6×	4 0.3×	10 0.7×	44	141
Antje Schwinger Germany	7	95 3.0×	17 0.5×	21 1.1×	4 0.3×		16	128
Lorraine Thompson Australia	7	49 1.5×	18 0.6×	15 0.8×	7 0.5×	3 0.2×	18	143

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Garside

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Garside's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Garside with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Garside more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Garside

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Garside. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Garside. The network helps show where Mark Garside may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Garside

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Garside. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Garside based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Garside. Mark Garside is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Fisher, James, et al.. (2017). Why geriatric medicine? A survey of UK specialist trainees in geriatric medicine. Age and Ageing. 46(4). 672–677. 12 indexed citations

2.

Fisher, James, et al.. (2017). 12 tips for developing trainee-led initiatives to promote recruitment to training in shortage specialties. MedEdPublish. 6. 143–143.

3.

Fisher, James, et al.. (2017). Being the 'Med Reg': An Exploration of Junior Doctors’ Perceptions of the Medical Registrar Role. The Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh. 47(1). 70–75. 12 indexed citations

4.

Brock, Peter, et al.. (2017). 33HOW CAN WE ATTRACT MORE PEOPLE TO GERIATRIC MEDICINE? A SURVEY OF UK SPECIALIST REGISTRARS IN GERIATRIC MEDICINE. Age and Ageing. 46(suppl_2). ii10–ii10. 1 indexed citations

5.

Garside, Mark, James Fisher, Adrian Blundell, & Adam Gordon. (2016). The development and evaluation of mini-GEMs – short, focused, online e-learning videos in geriatric medicine. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education. 39(2). 132–143. 14 indexed citations

6.

Brock, Peter, et al.. (2016). New ways to teach new doctors about older people. The Clinical Teacher. 14(4). 289–291. 1 indexed citations

7.

Fisher, James, Mark Garside, Kelly A. Hunt, & Nelson Lo. (2014). Geriatric medicine workforce planning: a giant geriatric problem or has the tide turned?. Clinical Medicine. 14(2). 102–106. 19 indexed citations

8.

Garside, Mark, et al.. (2012). Stroke and TIA Assessment Training. Simulation in Healthcare The Journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 7(2). 117–122. 15 indexed citations

9.

Rodgers, Helen, et al.. (2011). Remote specialist assessment for intravenous thrombolysis of acute ischaemic stroke by telephone. Emergency Medicine Journal. 29(9). 704–708. 10 indexed citations

10.

Taylor, Steve, et al.. (2006). Does a specialist team impact on repetition rates and discharge outcomes following the first episode of self-harm?. Mental Health Practice. 9(7). 30–32. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact