Mark E. Gill

1.7k total citations
17 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Mark E. Gill is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Gill has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Molecular Biology, 8 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 6 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Gill's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers). Mark E. Gill is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (8 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (5 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (5 papers). Mark E. Gill collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, United States and Australia. Mark E. Gill's co-authors include David C. Page, Yanfeng Lin, Yueh‐Chiang Hu, Antoine H.F.M. Peters, Serap Erkek, Y. Q. Shirleen Soh, Dirk Schübeler, Mizue Hisano, Jürgen Dieker and Rabih Murr and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Gill

15 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mark E. Gill Switzerland	9	904	409	346	258	131	17	1.2k
David L’Hôte France	19	504 0.6×	412 1.0×	325 0.9×	354 1.4×	121 0.9×	33	1.0k
Marja Ooms Netherlands	13	854 0.9×	351 0.9×	251 0.7×	277 1.1×	73 0.6×	15	1.1k
Mary L. Goodheart United States	9	918 1.0×	531 1.3×	377 1.1×	294 1.1×	63 0.5×	10	1.3k
Daniel J. Ballow United States	7	633 0.7×	477 1.2×	796 2.3×	407 1.6×	70 0.5×	10	1.1k
Emanuele Pelosi United States	19	697 0.8×	725 1.8×	426 1.2×	430 1.7×	65 0.5×	33	1.3k
Xianing Zheng United States	7	395 0.4×	224 0.5×	187 0.5×	259 1.0×	77 0.6×	8	637
Adrienne Niederriter Shami United States	7	399 0.4×	223 0.5×	216 0.6×	298 1.2×	65 0.5×	9	676
Lingbo Cai China	13	792 0.9×	190 0.5×	447 1.3×	270 1.0×	164 1.3×	46	1.2k
Shangying Liao China	13	449 0.5×	224 0.5×	165 0.5×	231 0.9×	129 1.0×	17	653
Yang Zeng United States	12	546 0.6×	140 0.3×	389 1.1×	428 1.7×	52 0.4×	21	991

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Gill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Gill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Gill. The network helps show where Mark E. Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Gill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Gill. Mark E. Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

Gill, Mark E., Manuel Fischer, Christian De Geyter, & Antoine H.F.M. Peters. (2025). Normozoospermic infertile men possess subpopulations of sperm varying in DNA accessibility, relating to differing reproductive outcomes. Human Reproduction. 40(7). 1266–1281.

Gill, Mark E., Hubertus Kohler, & Antoine H.F.M. Peters. (2024). Isolation of Mouse Germ Cells by FACS Using Hoechst 33342 and SYTO16 Double Staining. Methods in molecular biology. 2770. 53–62.

Gill, Mark E., et al.. (2023). De novo transcriptome assembly of mouse male germ cells reveals novel genes, stage-specific bidirectional promoter activity, and noncoding RNA expression. Genome Research. 33(12). 2060–2078. 4 indexed citations

Stenz, Ludwig, Matthias Beyens, Mark E. Gill, Ariane Paoloni‐Giacobino, & Christian De Geyter. (2022). Altered DNA methylation in estrogen-responsive repetitive sequences of spermatozoa of infertile men with shortened anogenital distance. Clinical Epigenetics. 14(1). 185–185. 2 indexed citations

Gill, Mark E. & Alexander Quaas. (2022). Looking with new eyes: advanced microscopy and artificial intelligence in reproductive medicine. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 40(2). 235–239. 3 indexed citations

Gill, Mark E., Hubertus Kohler, & Antoine H.F.M. Peters. (2022). Dual DNA staining enables isolation of multiple sub‐types of post‐replicative mouse male germ cells. Cytometry Part A. 101(6). 529–536. 4 indexed citations

Wang, Zhongyi, Evgeny Leushkin, Angélica Liechti, et al.. (2020). Transcriptome and translatome co-evolution in mammals. Nature. 588(7839). 642–647. 109 indexed citations

Liu, Zichuan, Mathieu Tardat, Mark E. Gill, et al.. (2020). SUMO ylated PRC 1 controls histone H3.3 deposition and genome integrity of embryonic heterochromatin. The EMBO Journal. 39(13). e103697–e103697. 20 indexed citations

Soh, Y. Q. Shirleen, Jan Philipp Junker, Mark E. Gill, et al.. (2015). A Gene Regulatory Program for Meiotic Prophase in the Fetal Ovary. PLoS Genetics. 11(9). e1005531–e1005531. 90 indexed citations

10.

Hu, Yueh‐Chiang, Tanmoy Bhattacharyya, Y. Q. Shirleen Soh, et al.. (2014). Retinoic Acid Activates Two Pathways Required for Meiosis in Mice. PLoS Genetics. 10(8). e1004541–e1004541. 139 indexed citations

11.

Erkek, Serap, Mizue Hisano, Ching-Yeu Liang, et al.. (2013). Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology. 20(7). 868–875. 269 indexed citations

12.

Gill, Mark E., Serap Erkek, & Antoine H.F.M. Peters. (2012). Parental epigenetic control of embryogenesis: a balance between inheritance and reprogramming?. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 24(3). 387–396. 33 indexed citations

13.

Dennis, Lucas, Mark E. Gill, Hristo B Houbaviy, et al.. (2011). Mir-290–295 deficiency in mice results in partially penetrant embryonic lethality and germ cell defects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(34). 14163–14168. 130 indexed citations

14.

Gill, Mark E., Yueh‐Chiang Hu, Yanfeng Lin, & David C. Page. (2011). Licensing of gametogenesis, dependent on RNA binding protein DAZL, as a gateway to sexual differentiation of fetal germ cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 108(18). 7443–7448. 150 indexed citations

15.

Page, David C., Jennifer F. Hughes, Daniel W. Bellott, et al.. (2010). Reconstructing sex chromosome evolution. Genome biology. 11(S1). 3 indexed citations

16.

Lin, Yanfeng, et al.. (2008). Germ Cell-Intrinsic and -Extrinsic Factors Govern Meiotic Initiation in Mouse Embryos. Science. 322(5908). 1685–1687. 200 indexed citations

17.

Gill, Mark E. & Albert Y. Zomaya. (1995). ON THE COLLISION DETECTION PROBLEM FOR ROBOT MANIPULATORS. Cybernetics & Systems. 26(2). 189–210. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact