Mark E. Borrello

779 total citations · 1 hit paper
12 papers, 435 citations indexed

About

Mark E. Borrello is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Genetics and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark E. Borrello has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 435 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 5 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in Mark E. Borrello's work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers). Mark E. Borrello is often cited by papers focused on Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (5 papers), Plant and animal studies (4 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (3 papers). Mark E. Borrello collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Israel. Mark E. Borrello's co-authors include William C. Ratcliff, R. Ford Denison, Michael Travisano, Michael Dietrich, David Sepkoski, Marlene Zuk, Thomas Suddendorf, Colin Allen and Gregory Radick and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, The Quarterly Review of Biology and Biology Letters.

In The Last Decade

Mark E. Borrello

11 papers receiving 415 citations

Hit Papers

Experimental evolution of multicellularity 2012 2026 2016 2021 2012 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark E. Borrello United States 6 208 195 171 78 41 12 435
Roberta M. Fisher United Kingdom 9 316 1.5× 218 1.1× 206 1.2× 228 2.9× 98 2.4× 10 753
N. V. Joshi India 11 226 1.1× 116 0.6× 67 0.4× 133 1.7× 66 1.6× 28 511
Lauren W. Ancel United States 3 342 1.6× 119 0.6× 291 1.7× 107 1.4× 46 1.1× 3 527
William D. Stansfield United States 8 143 0.7× 84 0.4× 105 0.6× 60 0.8× 28 0.7× 38 537
Jennifer T. Pentz United States 8 192 0.9× 158 0.8× 172 1.0× 62 0.8× 56 1.4× 16 406
Graham Bell Canada 6 229 1.1× 95 0.5× 133 0.8× 96 1.2× 48 1.2× 8 368
Joel B. Hägen United States 13 73 0.4× 40 0.2× 128 0.7× 75 1.0× 28 0.7× 28 424
Martin Willensdorfer United States 9 211 1.0× 96 0.5× 91 0.5× 103 1.3× 34 0.8× 9 327
Henry Byerly United States 8 190 0.9× 102 0.5× 114 0.7× 65 0.8× 32 0.8× 18 361
Jan Baedke Germany 11 113 0.5× 65 0.3× 94 0.5× 25 0.3× 27 0.7× 23 371

Countries citing papers authored by Mark E. Borrello

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark E. Borrello's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark E. Borrello with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark E. Borrello more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark E. Borrello

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark E. Borrello. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark E. Borrello. The network helps show where Mark E. Borrello may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark E. Borrello

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark E. Borrello. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark E. Borrello based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark E. Borrello. Mark E. Borrello is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Sepkoski, David & Mark E. Borrello. (2025). Sociobiology and the Politics of Objectivity. Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences. 55(1). 44–47. 1 indexed citations
2.
Dietrich, Michael, et al.. (2021). Handbook of the Historiography of Biology. 5 indexed citations
3.
Zuk, Marlene & Mark E. Borrello. (2013). Parasites and altruism: converging roads. Biology Letters. 9(6). 20130367–20130367. 2 indexed citations
4.
Ratcliff, William C., R. Ford Denison, Mark E. Borrello, & Michael Travisano. (2012). Experimental evolution of multicellularity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 109(5). 1595–1600. 342 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Suddendorf, Thomas, Mark E. Borrello, Colin Allen, & Gregory Radick. (2011). If I could talk to the animals. Metascience. 21(2). 253–267. 1 indexed citations
6.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2010). The farmer, the hunter, and the census taker: three distinct views of animal behavior.. PubMed. 32(1). 3–19. 1 indexed citations
7.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2010). Evolutionary Restraints. 27 indexed citations
8.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2009). Shifting balance and balancing selection: A group selectionist's interpretation of Wright and Dobzhansky. 99(1). 323–344. 3 indexed citations
9.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2005). The rise, fall and resurrection of group selection. Endeavour. 29(1). 43–47. 32 indexed citations
11.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2004). Mutual Aid and Animal Dispersion: An Historical Analysis of Alternatives to Darwin. Perspectives in biology and medicine. 47(1). 15–31. 5 indexed citations
12.
Borrello, Mark E.. (2003). Synthesis and Selection: Wynne-Edwards' Challenge to David Lack. Journal of the History of Biology. 36(3). 531–566. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026